185
Trickflation (hexbear.net)
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kristina@hexbear.net 94 points 5 months ago

Isn't this a literal toddler experiment

[-] DayOfDoom@hexbear.net 59 points 5 months ago

Woke scientists stopped experimenting on children and this happens.

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Piaget's theory of cognitive development

One example of an experiment for testing conservation is the water level task. An experimenter will have two glasses that are the same size, fill them to the same level with liquid, and make sure the child understands that both of the glasses have the same amount of water in them. Then, the experimenter will pour the liquid from one of the small glasses into a tall, thin glass. The experimenter will then ask the child if the taller glass has more liquid, less liquid, or the same amount of liquid. The child will then give his answer.

I always thought this test was "children think taller and thinner = more". But actually it's way different, this test is "children think taller and thinner = more, but they think it so hard that they think the quantity of liquid literally expands to fill the space."

[-] GlueBear@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago

Conservation? Yeah, kinda.

[-] the_itsb@hexbear.net 85 points 5 months ago

This happened with the dog food we were buying during the pandemic. The largest bag had been 42 lbs, but then it changed to a 38 lb package. The best part was that they also changed the labeling to say it was "38 LBS!! BONUS SIZE!!" — I have a really good memory for numbers and was instantly pissed about the marketing bullshit.

Same price, of course.

[-] kleeon@hexbear.net 84 points 5 months ago

the right can is clearly bigger

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 73 points 5 months ago

Less efficient use of aluminum for the same volume, too. They're wasting material to do this.

[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 24 points 5 months ago

Yup. And in most cases less packing efficiency too. Although in this case I think it is slightly more efficient

[-] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 23 points 5 months ago

Shorter rounder cans! With more volume!

[-] jayWL@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago

Oh, I heard the very reason for this was that it used like 5% less aluminium

[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

The shape of a soup can is the optimal surface area to volume ratio for a cylinder. If the materials were evenly distributed, it's roughly the optimal shape for using as little metal as possible. Deviating quite a bit from that shape is probably going to use more metal unless they decided to make some parts much thinner, something they could presumably do with the other cans as well.

[-] jayWL@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

I think the point was that due to a different construction, the walls could be made thinner or something, idk. I can't find it now and it was probably false. Most articles I find talk about how the new cans "feel more luxurious" and thus sell better.

[-] The_Walkening@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago

Seems to me that you can stack more on pallets due to the smaller diameter - I'd guess that it's less a savings on raw materials than it is a logistical one

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 51 points 5 months ago

They think you have the brain and attention span of a toddler

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 51 points 5 months ago
[-] alexandra_kollontai@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago

The Coca Cola company is not happy with me--that's okay, I'll still keep drinking that garbage.

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 37 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And they’re right. They’re still making bank each year for a reason

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 38 points 5 months ago

Though a big part of that is probably people lacking any alternative. They can't go and get the non-corporate soft drink that still comes in a regular can, their options are either to get the new, more expensive one, or not consume.

[-] DayOfDoom@hexbear.net 26 points 5 months ago

Seriously. I tried looking for store-brand sodas in cans and it's basically just ginger ale and seltzers/club sodas in cans here. Have to find a soda syrup wholesaler and getting a water carbonizer to even attempt to have an alternative, which isn't a necessarily small ask of a single person for one food item.

[-] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 5 months ago

Interesting. Here the local Kroger brand and Safeway both offer full ranges of own-brand soda. Sometimes even flavours (cream soda, pineapple) which have no major brand offering.

Maybe they sub-contract to the local independent bottler so the range varies by region.

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago

it's kind of an edge case, because kroger is the largest supermarket grocer (by revenue) in the US. and 30% of that revenue is from sales of their in-house branding. the only two larger retailers are amazon and walmart, which are international. kroger is only operating inside the US and only in 35 states. it's a beast.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kroger#Manufacturing_plants

[-] Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago

I switched to Costco fizzy water to lose weight. Chug it fast enough your brain sorta tricks you into thinking it's sweet.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 1 points 5 months ago

I like to get the off brand stuff you find at corner stores/mini marts idk what you call them.

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 29 points 5 months ago

Waterchads stay winning.

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 37 points 5 months ago

I remember when a can of soda was like 50 cents

[-] Jew@hexbear.net 28 points 5 months ago
[-] Beaver@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago

I was so pissed when the prices jumped up to 55 cents, cuz now I had to carry nickles around with me

[-] OgdenTO@hexbear.net 30 points 5 months ago

Lucky for us, in this open and free market system, we have the alternatives for buying whatever kind of overpriced cola we want. Or, the freedom to make our own HFCS-laden cola at home

[-] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 28 points 5 months ago

explaining to the DEA that I only tried to order Coca leaves for cola-making purposes

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 28 points 5 months ago

Psychologists are working overtime to innovate new ways to dupe you to buy companies' shit.

[-] Tiocfaidhcaisarla@hexbear.net 23 points 5 months ago

There is a lethal amount of boomer radiating off this display

[-] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 18 points 5 months ago

MY CAN KOOZIE COLLECTION IS WORTHLESS NOW!!! aubrey-cry-2

[-] SkibidiToiletFanAcct@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago

I don't know what market this is. I checked a bunch of kroger stores on their website, and in all of them, Coke was only available in 12 oz short cans, and was not $1, but closer to $0.5

[-] Tabitha@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

$0.5 each

and that's still 2x what they were 2 years ago.

[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 14 points 5 months ago

Wait, cans are changing? Where?

[-] Barabas@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago

They stopped selling the short cans in Sweden last year, all the tall cans now.

But there wasn't a difference in cost. Just that it uses slightly less aluminium, and the "bonus" of people thinking that a tall can might have more in it.

[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

Coming up with new sub-terminology for "marketing".

If you pay close attention to the price per weight of different sizes of products, it's pretty common that the bigger ones are actually more expensive per gram of crunch or goop despite costing less to manufacture. There are marketing geeks that think they can wow you with the packaging and size itself (or they overproduced the smaller one) and they point to all kinds of studies about how making products seem bigger makes them more desirable and likely to be purchased. The larger one might just plain be better because it's a more appropriate size for the person buying it, but rather than reflecting production efficiency, they just crank up the price, just enough that you don't notice, to rake in those sweet profits.

[-] immuredanchorite@hexbear.net 11 points 5 months ago

so glad I stopped drinking that shit 20 years ago

[-] DyingOfDeBordom@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago

I fantasized about taking a manager of Harris teeter hostage at gunpoint while screaming about how they can't keep getting away with it

The trigger for this fantasy? Harris teeter parboiled rice is like 1.59, the Success Rice equivalent is 3.59 and is the exact same fucking thing and you can guess which they've been sold out of for weeks

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

smuglord: "Just don't buy it if you don't like it! Maybe start your OWN soda company, IDC. Just leave the poor multibillion dollar company alone!'

[-] D61@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago

hehe...

So... what if there is such a glut of "Energy Drink" style can that its more cost effective for bottling plants or ... whatever a factory that makes aluminum cans is called ... to use the same style of can instead of making a batch of one style of can and then needing to retool to make another style of can?

[-] TheWurstman@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago

They’ve had these cans in the EU for a while

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
185 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13392 readers
876 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS