185
Trickflation (hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 6 points 6 months ago

The shape of a soup can is the optimal surface area to volume ratio for a cylinder. If the materials were evenly distributed, it's roughly the optimal shape for using as little metal as possible. Deviating quite a bit from that shape is probably going to use more metal unless they decided to make some parts much thinner, something they could presumably do with the other cans as well.

[-] jayWL@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

I think the point was that due to a different construction, the walls could be made thinner or something, idk. I can't find it now and it was probably false. Most articles I find talk about how the new cans "feel more luxurious" and thus sell better.

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
185 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13422 readers
990 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS