this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
100 points (99.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13957 readers
981 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 2 points 7 hours ago

they're going to blow up the moon

[–] onwardknave@hexbear.net 8 points 10 hours ago

I'm announcing a nuclear reactor in my pants.

[–] take_five_moments@hexbear.net 23 points 14 hours ago

yea sure fuck it why not

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 15 points 14 hours ago

Interim NASA administrator guaido

the empire's reach continues to expand more and more fantastically, even as its grasp recedes faster and faster

[–] revolut1917@hexbear.net 59 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (4 children)

TO POWER WHAT? WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKING MOONBASE

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

to be fair ideally you want the power source up there before the moonbase goes up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Keld@hexbear.net 54 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

It's like you've never heard of extension cords

[–] Meh@hexbear.net 3 points 11 hours ago

Space elevator, but it's just a bunch of orange extension cords daisy-chained together up to the moon.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 24 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

That would make the moon wrap around the earth and then we'd be stuck. Imagine it being March 12th or whatever for eternity

Source: I played tetherball in 4th grade so imagine this probably works the same

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 15 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

As long as we sync it up with christmas everyone will be happy, duh. You guys just keep trying to find problems with this obviously perfect plan.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 13 points 17 hours ago

TRUMP MOON-POWER CRYPTO - $100K MINIMUM BUY IN

[–] ComradeSpahija@hexbear.net 20 points 17 hours ago

Burgerland is generously going to power the Sino-Russian moonbase

[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 5 points 16 hours ago

That information has yet to be declassified, along with the bear problem it has.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, I think this is more than Mayo Pete ever did when he had this job

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 11 points 13 hours ago

Idiot doesn't know these jobs are gifts and you're supposed to just sit and smile pete

[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 20 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

America can, should, must, and will blow up the moon!

btw, isn't a large volume of water, like, extremely important for nuclear reactors?

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 6 points 11 hours ago

You can actually do without it, but it will be much more complex and several times more expensive.

[–] Cat_Daddy@hexbear.net 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I don't know how else to use nuclear radiation to make power except by heating water into steam. I know nasa has played with tiny reactors for spacecraft, but I don't know how they work. Perhaps they have something like a solar panel sitting next to a uranium rod and it generates electricity from that instead of photons?

[–] revolut1917@hexbear.net 20 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

They take advantage of the Seebeck effect which is where a voltage is generated between two points in a conducting material when there's a temperature difference between them. Basically the nuclear material heats one piece of metal in the circuit, while another remains cold, and this produces a potential difference between the two that drives current through the circuit. Because space is very cold and nuclear materials are very hot, this produces a useful quantity of current. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator

[–] Cat_Daddy@hexbear.net 13 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

So they're going to have to scale this method way the fuck up to get to 100kw.

[–] ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 hours ago

yes, while space is cold, the vacuum means that nearly all the heat has to be shed by radiation (meaning e.g. infrared radiation, not nookyular radiation) rather than conduction & convection. so the more you scale it up, the bigger the heat sinks needed. think giant metal fins to radiate away the heat. eventually it becomes prohibitive.

interestingly, the 40KW NASA pilot project this proposal appears to be derived from is a Stirling engine, not a radioisotope thermal generator like on New Horizons, Cassini, etc.

a Stirling design converts much more of the heat to electricity than an RTG, but it has moving parts.

[–] revolut1917@hexbear.net 14 points 15 hours ago

yeah it'd be very unfeasible

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 10 points 14 hours ago

Watch this shit is to power ai

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 49 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Copying China's homework from May, except China actually has the capability to do it.

[–] semioticbreakdown@hexbear.net 36 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Mr president, we cannot allow a lunar gap!

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 21 points 18 hours ago

The lunar gap already definitively exists. China is up there bringing home samples, making a communication infrastructure to reach the far side, and about to do ISRU tests next.

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 36 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Coal for earth, nuclear for moon (supposedly) .

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 11 points 15 hours ago

Look at it sparkle though, that's some Clean Coal™ right there!

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 25 points 18 hours ago

Let me guess, this whole operation will be "managed" by AI.

[–] semioticbreakdown@hexbear.net 41 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

good luck getting it there on one of Musk's dogcrap starships lol

ok here is my prediction. A fun little hyperstitional prophecy. I think whenever Amerikkka inevitably crumbles in the future some of the last fascists will really try to make an American government-in-exile on the moon like all those joke sci-fi Nazi stories/conspiracies.

[–] LangleyDominos@hexbear.net 26 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

I'm going to go with them putting a nuclear reactor on the moon but it leaks, creating radiation showers. Part of our weather forecasts is dedicated to these radiation showers and they're something we simply have to deal with forever because nobody ever goes back up there to fix it.

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

fortunately that's not possible so we're good. even if there was somehow enough radiation leaking from the moon to be noticeable here, it couldnt make the journey out of Luna's gravity well.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 21 points 18 hours ago

the chinese would, except the remnant of the US threatens them with all their nukes if they do

[–] Sulvy@hexbear.net 13 points 18 hours ago

Step away from the lathe

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] miz@hexbear.net 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

isn't there a video game where you shoot up a nazi base on the moon. wait is that Doom?

[–] semioticbreakdown@hexbear.net 3 points 9 hours ago

one of the wolfenstein games

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Well while were just saying were gonna do things I'm planning on terraforming Venus sometime next year. Anyone who wants to help hmu. Shouldnt take too long.

[–] Bruja@hexbear.net 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Human-breathable air floats like helium on Venus’s surface. If you want to put people on Venus quickly, the most Earth-like environment in the Sol system floats like 55km above the surface so could get people in a sky city with less trouble than terraforming.

[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

I dont wanna live in a blimp tho.

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 26 points 19 hours ago

Bit idea: Elon manages to use all the DOGE cuts to get approval to do this and then nukes Texas when his ship blows up on the launchpad

[–] Cat_Daddy@hexbear.net 10 points 16 hours ago

This is just cover for putting nukes on the moon, right?

"Just curious, are we invading Iran today?"

[–] EatPotatoes@hexbear.net 12 points 17 hours ago

I don’t care who is doing it. Sending people to the moon again feels so unnecessary when you got robots.

[–] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 12 points 17 hours ago

They're gonna send a nuke to the moon and detonate it and say that's a nuclear reactor

load more comments
view more: next ›