[-] huf@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago

ha! no, it's literally 888.

The oldest use that the Oxford English Dictionary gives for less with a countable noun is a quotation from 888 by Alfred the Great

[-] huf@hexbear.net 9 points 5 days ago

another thing to consider, they didnt often have the boss watching them while they worked. yes, the endless chores had to be done every god damned day, but your time was yours to manage to a large extent. want to pop off and chat with your neighbor for an hour in the middle of the day? who's gonna stop you? who's gonna look at your timesheet? what timesheet?

[-] huf@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago

yes, let's submit our language to the arbitrary opinions of some long dead english gentry idiot, why dont we. never mind how people have actually used the words for literal centuries at this point, we must uphold the bigoted idiocy of the english upper classes!

[-] huf@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

well, in-universe, the stories are elven lore handed down to us through numenorean transmission. so anything the elves didnt know about or understand is gonna be vague.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

she's not an exception. there are many (unnamed) ainur, and many of them spend time without a fana (the seeming-body that unfallen ainur wear when they want to be like people). maybe some of them never (or only very rarely) put it on.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

trying to wean europeans off their endemic alcoholism is whatever, i doubt you'll achieve much, and this is probably not the way to do it, but at least it's not a terrible idea in theory.

but i love this british practice of labelling socializing as "anti-social behavior".

reminds me of another british article where residents were worried that teenagers would congregate in parks and stand around and talk to each other, and how this anti-social behavior must be stopped.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 3 points 6 days ago

A figure strode to the fissure, no more than man-high yet terror seemed to go before it. They could see the furnace-fire of its yellow eyes from afar; its arms were very long; it had a red [?tongue]. Through the air it sprang over the fiery fissure. The flames leaped up to great it and wreathed about it. Its streaming hair seemed to catch fire, and the sword that it held turned to flame. In its other hand it held a whip of many thongs.

  • man-high probably means two rangar, so about 2m (something like the numenorean average male height). the half in halfling refers to being about one ranga tall.
  • there is a terror aura.
  • it's not inherently on fire. the eyes look like they're on fire. the flames (normal flames from a normal fire) dance about him. his hair SEEMS to catch fire (it doesnt).

this is the earliest conception of the balrog in LOTR, and the only thing it's missing is the shadow aura.

there are earlier conceptions of balrogs but they're much more vague and anyway, they refer to a very different conception of balrogs. or are we supposed to take the depiction of what seem to be flame tanks seriously too? (old version of the fall of gondolin)

[-] huf@hexbear.net 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

i dont think arien had a body though. not even one she could put on or take off at will, like the other maiar.

balrogs were trapped in their physical bodies, like morgoth.

i think it just looked like a 2m tall dude with a shadow aura, and a lot of heat coming off him.

edit: yep, arien cast off her body and that's when she was pure flame:

Too bright were the eyes of Arien for even the Eldar to look on, and leaving Valinor she forsook the form and raiment which like the Valar she had worn there, and she was as a naked flame, terrible in the fullness of her splendor.

she had to, cos the fruit ship she was gonna captain was too hot. it would've burned her god body.

32
68
submitted 2 months ago by huf@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

seriously. where are all these masses coming from who think a cat's coloring affects their personality? what the fuck?

even though we're also super racist, this at least is not a thing here. it's never been a thing.

what the fuck.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 102 points 5 months ago

great takes in that thread:

This actually isn’t right. The main thing that pushed the country to the right and led to Nixon was the race riots of the 60s. Read Omar wasows research.

oh really, the race riots, eh? why were there race riots?

36
submitted 5 months ago by huf@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

pls help.

21
submitted 7 months ago by huf@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
[-] huf@hexbear.net 90 points 7 months ago

i kinda brought it up to a finance type guy yesterday and he said that after decades of terrible economic policy, argentina is finally on the right track, even if it's gonna hurt in the short term.

these fuckers will bend reality until it breaks before admitting that maybe people need food to eat.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 120 points 8 months ago

Yeah. When your options are:

  1. die, and have your country destroyed
    Or
  2. fight alongside nazis to avoid dying
    Unsurprisingly, you choose 2). Granted the brits probably would have helped if it were possible, but it wasnt.

what the fuck are you talking about, the soviets beat your ass twice and your nazi shit country is still fucking there. you keep saying the russians would have taken everything BUT THEY WON AND THEY DIDNT EVEN TAKE FINLAND.

just unbelievable amounts of imaginary worldbuilding, jesus christ.

91
submitted 9 months ago by huf@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

dude's the heir of the earl of fucking sandwich and they're pretending they're youtuber homesteaders.

just what. barbara-pit

25
submitted 9 months ago by huf@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

incredible brain melting slop.

all the great hits of liberalism revisited.

democracy under attack equally from the right and the left!

some masturbation about post ww2 hegemony being for the good of all mankind.

remember to vote for genocide joe, i guess.

7
submitted 10 months ago by huf@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

the first few pages have things like this:

Thus may I mention, not by way of excuse but by way of explanation, that on this occasion, apart from my accursed adventurous spirit, it was the protection of Great Britain and Christian civilization that prompted me to travel anew. And I ask the educated Reader whether there is a more worthy calling for a British subject than to serve under the Royal flag the elevated ideas of mankind and Christianity against their sworn enemies.

Mankind, redeemed of his sins, was writing "one thousand nine hundred and thirty-five" when the government of His Majesty came to the conclusion that, in all probability, we should have to wage war with Italy.

At the same time we willingly recognized the heroic feats of the Italian soldiers whose death-defying courage and other honourable virtues might well be followed as an example by every loyal British subject of character, naturally under the Union Jack, and against the Italians. I repeat that as regards the how of the matter there was no discord between my country and Italy; it was merely the why of it which provided a basis for disagreement.

As their motive for the Ethiopian action, the Italians put forward their desire to liberate the Ethiopians from the yoke of the Amharas and to spread culture. The obvious untruthfulness of this — with all due respect — must prompt every sober-minded and better educated person to laughter if he has even but a passing knowledge of the diplomatic phrases customary in other countries when they wish to gloss over the essence of things and thereby mislead the uninitiated observer.

I have no wish to slip into the error of partiality in the way of travellers who are not above a disproportionately ostentatious display of the glory of their country in the guise of scientific description; I believe, however, that with all modesty and due respect to foreign states I might mention that adoption of such a perspective is an error a British subject would never commit. In my country it is well known even to the less educated that the devoted but noble work of liberating the peoples of the tropics has always been a heartfelt duty of Great Britain. Sufficient proof may, I feel, be found in the many colonies from South-East India to the Boers, whose peoples were set free from oppression at the cost of heavy battles.

And, much as an English gentleman is left cold by the material aspect, I cannot conceal my opinion that, apart from the cause of culture and freedom, Italy, in making her decision, may have been influenced, possibly unconsciously, by Ethiopian coffee and oil-fields.

This is why the government of His Majesty, having made sanctions against the Italians, came to the decision to launch a defensive war against Italy.

AND THIS IS JUST THE FIRST FEW PAGES OF THE FIRST CHAPTER

27
submitted 11 months ago by huf@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

riddle me this, @Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net

36
submitted 11 months ago by huf@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

It's a challenging time, not only for our industry but [...]

our industry

industry

1
submitted 1 year ago by huf@hexbear.net to c/chat@hexbear.net

brought it home unharmed, let it go and watched me chase it.

fucker has actually taught me to catch mice (you just grab them with a thick towel so they cant bite you). i guess i wont starve now :)

1

oh wait never mind, it's france.

anyway, china bad, good thing the west is accountable to its citizens at least.

0

amazing.

view more: next ›

huf

joined 2 years ago