news

24636 readers
627 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of a Quds Day march in Bandar Abbas, Iran.


It now seems likely that, very soon, the US and the Zionists will attempt to bomb Iran. Compared to the buildup to the Iraq War, the stated goals of such a move are being kept a little more generalized - some say the point is to overthrow the government for "humanitarian" purposes (others are more honest and want to partition Iran into a dozen powerless statelets). Some people instead say the point is to get rid of the ballistic missile program, which is synonymous with outright surrender, as no matter the deal, bombers would be en route within 10 minutes of the last batch being handed over.

Still others say that the goal is to destroy the Iranian nuclear program, which, as the thread title implies, is now in a bizarre propaganda superposition: it is apparently simultaneously true to the Trump administration that the US obliterated the nuclear facilities and set back Iran's nuclear program years, if not decades, but also that Iran is mere days away from finishing a nuke and a new round of bombing is urgently required. This obviously casts newfound doubts on how effective US weapons even are at penetrating Iran's underground facilities (though it doesn't necessarily mean they didn't breach them, as Iran was almost certainly moving nuclear material out of Fordow and other sites in the days before the Twelve Day War). The sheer quantity of US anti-air defense equipment they're shifting into position also casts doubts on whether Iran's air defense was mostly destroyed during that conflict, as those who assert that the Zionists had total air supremacy over Iran seem to be implying.

I'm not a military guy, and so I have no novel insights on how such a war is likely to go, nor do I feel confident predicting either side's victory. I'm looking at most of the same sources that you're all looking at. Some confidently boast of the total destruction of Iran's air defense within hours, allowing US planes to fly directly over Iranian cities and drop bombs en masse; others cast doubts on whether this will ever occur, and say that the US's limited supply of Tomahawk missiles is the only major firepower they will be able to safely unleash. Some say this war will last mere days before state collapse; others say months, maybe even years. I have no idea.

I do at least feel somewhat bolstered by the fact that Russia and China finally appear to be pouring in meaningful information and matériel to help Iran this time around, though of course, one can still debate whether it's enough. I feel like we are at the culmination of decades of war planning by both the US and Iran, and the result could have deep ramifications indeed.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


2
229
Introducing: HexAtlas (hex-atlas.netlify.app)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by hex_atlas@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
 
 

Hello and warm greetings to my fellow news mega enjoyers and to the wider hexbear, lemmygrad and lemmy.ml community,

I've been finding myself browsing the newsmega often and was often thinking of a way that would help me contextualize the discussions and news that I'm reading. I remembered an atlas I had in school that would show the location of industries and natural ressources (and more) and decided try to recreate a digital version similar to https://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/. When I stumbled upon lemmy-js-client I found a fun way to display lemmy comments geographically, which I would like to share with you:

https://hex-atlas.netlify.app/

⚠️ Spoiler Tags are not implemented thus CWs are not hidden

Nexus Features:

I'm open for suggestions, but would like to continuously add new features:

  • Mastodon.social (well documented)
  • Marxists.org (will be difficult)
  • ~~Moon of Alabama (looks easy)~~ (Thank you @someone@hexbear.net for pointing out the transphobia)
  • Usability and performance improvements
  • and maybe more cool features where the guiding ideas are: "IRL Victoria 3 UI" and a "cockpit for newsmega-enjoyers" (e.g. comparing regions and seeing commodity/capital flows, real-time 1% flight data, vessel data - to enjoy the ansar allah blockade, virgin chad ranking, etc.)

Basic usage:

  • You can either search for a place or click on it. You'll see various scopes: provinces/territories, countries, intermediate regions, sub regions, continent. You can click also on these to change the scope. What it actually does is send it as a search query into lemmy and you see the search results to it (I built a fancy search page). IN the Fediverse Tab you can select the instances, sort types, and other settings from lemmy. On the Nexus Tab you have a similar behaviour, just for the various modules. You'll see the wiki of whatever is selected on the map :

  • use query to search location by query e. g. brics and find discussions pertaining to the selected location.

  • the query field can also be used to find and filter content by communities that are not listed

  • on Mobile long press pictures to unblur it (not fully tested) on desktop hover with mouse

tldr: Attention [Pink]: Select an option [Purple] to reveal selected information [Yellow].

It's in a prototype stage so please keep in mind:

  • ⚠️ Spoiler Tags are not implemented thus CWs are not hidden ⚠️

  • It's mostly optimized for desktops. Sry comrades with old hardware - no optimization, yet :( @kota@hexbear.net post inspired me to look into this tho.

  • Provinces/Territories: While I was doing manual edits to some regions I realized I'm doing something very political (duh). Following this, I'm looking for solutions to implement user defined regions (if there's interest from you) e.g. #fromTheRiverToTheSea #brics #udssr #whatever Comrade @SleeplessOne1917@lemmy.ml offered help, but I have only experience with front-end and am not sure how and what to propose. All my ideas are leveraging the current state of development and might be annoying to you. If you have experience, suggestions, etc. on how to make this work, feel free to start a discussion, reach out, etc.

  • Provinces/Territories: If you want something particularly aggravating changed asap, feel free to start a discussion and vOtE! I'll update manually.

  • Countries that span two continents are only displayed as belonging to one e.g. Russia - Europe (Dataset used: https://github.com/lukes/ISO-3166-Countries-with-Regional-Codes)

  • Right now this project is exclusive to hexbear, lemmygrad, lemmy.ml and their federated instances. I have an inner conflict: Generally, fuck intellectual property and I would like to make it foss, but this would make it available for lib/chud content as well. Should I? Help me resolve this.

  • No login implemented

Please consider this a tribute to this community, which I've been lurking and a member since the r/CTH days (nevar forget). I started web development not too long ago and am deeply inspired by dev titans among others:

@nutomic@lemmy.ml

@dessalines@lemmy.ml

@SleeplessOne1917@lemmy.ml

Thank you and the mods and admins for making hexbear/lemmy what it is today.

rat-salute

Enjoy your weekend :)

(After I post this I will leave the computer for a while and wont be able to really check and respond for a few hours)

Death to fascism

Death to capitalism

Death to imperialism

Trans rights are human rights

EDIT: After some consideration I decided to make the code public under the GNU AFFERO GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE ( AGPL-3.0 license )

https://github.com/hexatlas/lemmy-atlas/

https://git.altesq.net/hex_atlas/lemmy-atlas/

3
4
5
6
7
8
11
Iran is bombing Qatar (www.aljazeera.com)
submitted 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) by Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
 
 

I can hear the bombings; I've no idea how far away it's happening but I can actually hear it

I don't blame Iran for this, I wholly blame Israel and Trump for this

9
10
 
 

So, we’ve got Navy mutiny also. Poll numbers now showing support for Palestine exceeds that of Israel.

More and more folks coming forward in DC calling for serious consequences. Death Penalty bill being proposed for pedophilia.

Whenever I’m personally out and about mentioning aloud that we should never stop talking about Epstein folks just smile, nod and/or say something in agreement.

Folks, do we got ourselves the preconditions for some sorta revolution yet?

11
 
 

Anthropic's response: https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-comments-secretary-war

Looks like they're standing their ground, which is an admirable stance.

12
 
 

Snip:

For the first time in recent history, more Americans now sympathize more with the Palestinians than the Israelis, a Gallup poll has found. According to the survey, sympathy for the Israeli cause has fallen a record 10% in the last year.

The poll, which was published on Friday, found that 41% of Americans say their sympathies lie “more with the Palestinians” than the Israelis, up from 33% last year. 36% say they sympathize “more with the Israelis,” down from 46% last year. The remainder either have no opinion or do not favor one side over the other.

[...]

Americans of all ages have grown to favor the Palestinians more in recent years, with those aged 18-34 and 35-54 now sympathizing with them over the Israelis.

Republicans and the elderly are now the only demographics expressing a clear preference for Israel. 70% of Republicans and 49% of over-55s sympathize with the Israelis, with 13% and 31% of these groups siding with the Palestinians, respectively.

13
 
 

Violent and non-violent death tolls for the Gaza conflict: new primary evidence from a population-representative field survey, February 18, 2026

Our findings contradict claims that the MoH has inflated the death toll from the war in the Gaza Strip.4 Instead, the MoH appears to provide conservative, reliable figures while working under extraordinary constraints. Our estimates are also incompatible with projections that indirect deaths are at least four times higher than violent deaths7 or that 62 413 people died of starvation.8 Although subsequent conditions worsened, our data to early January, 2025, show that violent deaths outnumbered non-violent deaths.

Summary (English)

Summary

Background

High-quality mortality estimates are crucial for understanding the human cost of conflict. The Gaza Ministry of Health (MoH) has provided regular updates to their violent death toll for the Gaza Strip following Oct 7, 2023, but these reports have attracted both criticism and support. Independent estimates of both violent and non-violent deaths were needed.

Methods

We conducted a population-representative household survey, the Gaza Mortality Survey, between Dec 30, 2024, and Jan 5, 2025. We surveyed 2000 households across 200 primary sampling units, documenting the vital status of 9729 household members as of Oct 6, 2023, plus newborns. The sample was stratified by dwelling type and Governorate of origin. We used raking procedures to adjust for demographic characteristics and calculated confidence intervals using Taylor series linearisation. Sampling occurred in accessible areas, with displaced populations representing inaccessible Governorates.

Findings

We estimated 75 200 violent deaths (95% CI 63 600–86 800) between Oct 7, 2023, and Jan 5, 2025, representing approximately 3·4% of the Gaza Strip's pre-conflict population. Women, children (ie, younger than 18 years), and older people (ie, older than 64 years) comprised 56·2% (95% CI 50·4–61·9) of violent deaths, totalling 42 200 deaths (95% CI 33 100–51 300). We also estimated 16 300 non-violent deaths (12 300–20 200), of which 8540 (4540–12 500) represent excess deaths above pre-conflict projections. The MoH figure for this period (49 090 violent deaths) was 34·7% below our central estimate.

Interpretation

This first independent population survey of mortality in the Gaza Strip shows that violent deaths have substantially exceeded official figures whereas the demographic composition of casualties aligns with MoH reporting. Non-violent excess deaths, although substantial, are lower than some projections have suggested. These findings show the feasibility of mortality surveillance in active conflict zones and provide crucial empirical foundations for assessing the true human cost of the conflict.

Funding

European Research Council Grant 101055176, ANTICIPATE, and the Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disaster at Université Catholique de Louvain.

Translation

For the Arabic translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Introduction

High-quality war mortality estimates play a crucial role in illuminating the human cost of conflict, as shown by studies in Kosovo, Iraq, and Darfur.1–3 During active conflict, however, such estimates are challenging to obtain due to security constraints and population displacement. The Gaza Ministry of Health (MoH) has provided regular updates to the violent death toll in the Gaza Strip since Oct 7, 2023. However, MoH reports have attracted both criticism4 and support.5,6

A capture–recapture analysis published in 2025 by Jamaluddine and colleagues5 estimated 64 260 deaths (95% CI 55 298–78 525) due to traumatic injury to June 30, 2024. However, two of three data sources were MoH-generated, limiting the study's independence from official figures. Multiple plausible models using the three data sources estimated wide-ranging confidence intervals (47 457 to 88 332 deaths). Moreover, MoH-based studies5,6 do not address non-violent excess deaths.

Information on non-violent excess deaths in the Gaza Strip remains scant. One analysis7 projected that non-violent deaths could be four times as high as violent deaths, whereas physicians working in the Gaza Strip8 claimed tens of thousands of deaths due to starvation and its complications. However, these estimates do not have empirical foundation. Médecins Sans Frontières surveyed 2523 staff and family members, finding a death rate of just over 2% with 48% of blast-related deaths occurring in children.9 However, this staff census was not population-representative. To date, no population-representative survey has provided independent estimates of either violent or non-violent deaths for the Gaza conflict.

We present results from the Gaza Mortality Survey (GMS), which is, to our knowledge, the first population-representative household survey conducted during the current Gaza conflict. Our aims were to: (1) provide an independent estimate of violent deaths; (2) assess the demographic composition of casualties; and (3) estimate non-violent excess mortality.

Research in context

Evidence before this study

We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and grey literature from Oct 7, 2023, to Dec 30, 2024, using terms including “Gaza mortality”, “Gaza death toll”, “Palestine conflict casualties”, “war mortality estimation”, and “household mortality surveys”. Before this study, mortality estimates for the Gaza conflict relied primarily on administrative records from the Gaza Ministry of Health (MoH), which some analysts have contested. Thus, independent assessment of the conflict's death toll is needed, a gap partially filled by a capture–recapture analysis that used MoH data combined with social media obituaries to estimate 64 260 (95% CI 55 298–78 525) violent deaths to June, 2024. However, two of the three data sources in that analysis were components of the MoH database itself, restricting the study's independence. No population-based household surveys had been conducted to provide fully independent mortality estimates for the Gaza conflict, and no empirically grounded estimates existed for non-violent excess deaths caused indirectly by the war.

Added value of this study

This study provides the first independent, population-based household survey estimate of mortality in Gaza during the current conflict. We surveyed 2000 households representing 9729 individuals and estimated 75 200 violent deaths (95% CI 63 600–86 800) and 8540 excess non-violent deaths (4540–12 500) between Oct 7, 2023, and Jan 5, 2025. The MoH figureis 34·7% below our central estimate, closely aligning with the capture–recapture analysis, which found that the MoH figure was 39·1% below their estimate for their coverage period, providing rare cross-methodology validation. We found that 56·2% of violent deaths were among women, children, and older people (older than 64 years), consistent with MoH demographic reporting. The study showed that rigorous household mortality surveys are feasible even in extremely challenging conflict environments and challenges assumptions about inevitably high ratios of indirect to direct deaths in modern conflicts.

Implications of all the available evidence

The combined evidence suggests that, as of Jan 5, 2025, 3–4% of the population of the Gaza Strip had been killed violently and there have been a substantial number of non-violent deaths caused indirectly by the conflict. The validation of MoH reporting through multiple independent methodologies supports the reliability of its administrative casualty recording systems even under extreme conditions. The demonstration that household surveys remain feasible in active conflict zones should encourage similar data collection efforts in other conflicts where administrative systems might be compromised. These findings underscore the crucial importance of maintaining multiple, independent mortality estimation approaches and continued international monitoring of civilian casualties in conflict zones.

Summary (Arabic)

اﻟﻣُﻠَﺧﱠص

ﺧﻠﻔﯿﺔ:

ﺗﻌﺘﺒﺮﻋﻤﻠﯿﺔﺗﻘﺪﯾﺮ اﻟﻮﻓﯿﺎت ﻋﺎﻟﯿﺔ اﻟﺠﻮدة أﻣﺮا ﺑﺎﻟﻎ اﻷھﻤﯿﺔ ﻟﻔﮭﻢ اﻟﺘﻜﻠﻔﺔ اﻟﺒﺸﺮﯾﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﺮب.ﻗﺎﻣﺖوزارة اﻟﺼﺤﺔاﻟﻔﻠﺴﻄﯿﻨﯿﺔﻓﻲﻗﻄﺎعﻏﺰةﺑﻨﺸﺮ أﻋﺪاد اﻟﻘﺘﻠﻰاﻟﻨﺎﺟﻤﺔ ﻋﻦ اﻟﻌﻨﻒﻓﻲ ﻗﻄﺎع ﻏﺰة ﺑﻌﺪاﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻦﺗﺸﺮﯾﻦ اﻷول/أﻛﺘﻮﺑﺮ2023، ﻟﻜﻦ ھﺬه اﻟﺘﻘﺎرﯾﺮ أﺛﺎرتﺗﺤﻔﻈﺎتودﻋﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪ ﺳﻮاء. ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ،ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ھﻨﺎك ﺣﺎﺟﺔ إﻟﻰ ﺗﻘﺪﯾﺮات ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ اﻟﻮﻓﯿﺎت اﻟﻌﻨﯿﻔﺔوﻏﯿﺮاﻟﻌﻨﯿﻔﺔ.

اﻟﻤﻨﮭﺠﯿﺔ:

أﺟﺮﯾﻨﺎﻣﺴﺤﺎﻟﻌﯿﻨﺔﺳﻜﺎﻧﯿﺔﻣﻤﺜﻠﺔﻟﻸﺳﺮاﻟﻔﻠﺴﻄﯿﻨﯿﺔ،وھﻮﻣﺴﺢ وﻓﯿﺎت ﻏﺰة،وذﻟﻚ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻔﺘﺮة اﻟﻮاﻗﻌﺔﺑﯿﻦ30ﻛﺎﻧﻮن اﻷول/دﯾﺴﻤﺒﺮ2024و5ﻛﺎﻧﻮن اﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ/ﯾﻨﺎﯾﺮ2025.ﻗﻤﻨﺎﺑﻤﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ2,000أﺳﺮةﻓﻲ 200ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔاو ﺗﺠﻤﻊﺳﻜﺎﻧﻲ،ﺣﯿﺚ ﻗﻤﻨﺎﺑﺘﻮﺛﯿﻖاﻟﺤﺎﻟﺔ اﻟﺤﯿﻮﯾﺔ ل9,729ﻓﺮدا ﻣﻦ أﻓﺮاد اﻷﺳﺮوذﻟﻚاﻋﺘﺒﺎرا ﻣﻦﺗﺎرﯾﺦ6أﻛﺘﻮﺑﺮ2023،ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔﻟﻸطﻔﺎل ﺣﺪﯾﺜﻲ اﻟﻮﻻدة.ﺗﻢ ﺗﻘﺴﯿﻢ اﻟﻌﯿﻨﺔ إﻟﻰ طﺒﻘﺎت ﺣﺴﺐ ﻧﻮع اﻟﻤﺴﻜﻦ وﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﺔ اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄ.اﺳﺘﺨﺪﻣﻨﺎ إﺟﺮاءاتاﻟﺘﺼﻨﯿﻒ-raking proceduresﻟﻀﺒﻂ اﻟﺨﺼﺎﺋﺺ اﻟﺪﯾﻤﻮﻏﺮاﻓﯿﺔ وﺣﺴﺎب ﻓﺘﺮات اﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪامﺗﺨﻄﯿﻂ ﻣﺘﺴﻠﺴﻠﺔﺗﺎﯾﻠﻮرـTaylor series linearization.ﺗﻢ أﺧﺬ اﻟﻌﯿﻨﺎتﻣﻦ اﻟﻤﻨﺎطﻖاﻟﺴﻜﻨﯿﺔاﻟﺘﻲﺗﻤﻜﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ اﻟﻮﺻﻮل إﻟﯿﮭﺎ،وﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺎطﻖ اﻟﻨﺰوحﻟﺘﻠﻚاﻟﻤﺤﺎﻓﻈﺎتاﻟﺘﻲ ﻟﻢ ﯾﻜﻦ ﻣﺘﺎﺣﺎ اﻟﻮﺻﻮل إﻟﯿﮭﺎ.

اﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ:

ﻧﻘﺪرﺣﺪوث75,200ﺣﺎﻟﺔ وﻓﺎةﻧﺎﺗﺠﺔ ﻋﻦ اﻟﻌﻨﻒ)ﺑﺪرﺟﺔﺛﻘﺔﺗﺒﻠﻎ95٪ﺑﺤﯿﺚ ﯾﻤﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻌﺪداﻟﻔﻌﻠﻲأن ﯾﺘﺮاوحﺑﯿﻦ63,600و86,800(وذﻟﻚ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻔﺘﺮة ﻣﻦ7أﻛﺘﻮﺑﺮ/ﺗﺸﺮﯾﻦ اﻷول2023و5ﻛﺎﻧﻮن اﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ/ﯾﻨﺎﯾﺮ 2025، وھﻮ ﻣﺎ ﯾﻤﺜﻞ ﺣﻮاﻟﻲ3.4٪ ﻣﻦإﺟﻤﺎﻟﻲﺳﻜﺎن ﻏﺰةاﻟﻤﺴﺠﻠﯿﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﺪأ اﻟﺼﺮاع.ﺷﻜﻠﺖ اﻟﻨﺴﺎء، واﻷطﻔﺎلﻣﻤﻦ ھﻢ دون اﻟﺜﺎﻣﻨﺔ ﻋﺸﺮة،وﻛﺒﺎر اﻟﺴﻦ)اﻟﺬﯾﻦ ﯾﺒﻠﻎ ﻋﻤﺮھﻢ65ﺳﻨﺔ وأﻛﺜﺮ(ﻧﺴﺒﺔ56.2٪)ﺑﺪرﺟﺔ ﺛﻘﺔﺑﻠﻐﺖ95٪ﺣﯿﺚ ﯾﻤﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻨﺴﺒﺔ أن ﺗﺘﺮاوح ﺑﯿﻦ50.4٪و61.9٪(ﻣﻦﻣﺠﻤﻮعاﻟﻮﻓﯿﺎت اﻟﻨﺎﺟﻤﺔ ﻋﻦاﻟﻌﻨﻒ، ﺑﻌﺪدإﺟﻤﺎﻟﻲﺑﻠﻎ42,200ﺣﺎﻟﺔ وﻓﺎة)ﺑﺪرﺟﺔﺛﻘﺔﺗﺒﻠﻎ95٪ﺑﺤﯿﺚ ﯾﻤﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻌﺪد أن ﯾﺘﺮاوح ﺑﯿﻦ33,100 و51,300(.ﻧﻘﺪر أﯾﻀﺎﺣﺪوث16,300ﺣﺎﻟﺔ وﻓﺎة ﻏﯿﺮﻧﺎﺗﺠﺔ ﻋﻦاﻟﻌﻨﻒ)12,300-20,200(، ﻣﻨﮭﺎ 8,540ﺣﺎﻟﺔ)4,540-12,500(ﺗﻤﺜﻞ وﻓﯿﺎتإﺿﺎﻓﯿﺔ ﺗﺰﯾﺪ ﻋﻦﺗﻮﻗﻌﺎت ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ اﻟﺤﺮب.ﺑﮭﺬا ﯾﻜﻮنﻣﺠﻤﻞ ﻋﺪد اﻟﻮﻓﯿﺎتاﻟﻨﺎﺟﻤﺔ ﻋﻦ اﻟﺤﺮب اﻟﻮارد ﻓﻲ ﺗﻘﺎرﯾﺮ وزارة اﻟﺼﺤﺔ اﻟﻔﻠﺴﻄﯿﻨﯿﺔ ﺑﻐﺰةﻟﺘﻠﻚاﻟﻔﺘﺮة، وھﻮ 49,090،أﻗﻞ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ34.7٪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﯾﺮﻧﺎاﻻﺳﺎﺳﻲ. اﻟﺘﻔﺴﯿﺮ:ﯾﻈﮭﺮ ھﺬا اﻟﻤﺴﺢ اﻟﺴﻜﺎﻧﻲ اﻟﻤﺴﺘﻘﻞ اﻷول ﻟﻠﻮﻓﯿﺎت ﻓﻲ ﻏﺰة أن اﻟﻮﻓﯿﺎت اﻟﻌﻨﯿﻔﺔ ﺗﺠﺎوزت اﻷرﻗﺎم اﻟﺮﺳﻤﯿﺔ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﯿﺮ ﻓﻲ ﺣﯿﻦ أن اﻟﺘﺮﻛﯿﺒﺔ اﻟﺪﯾﻤﻮﻏﺮاﻓﯿﺔ ﻟﻠﻀﺤﺎﯾﺎ ﺗﺘﻤﺎﺷﻰ ﻣﻊ ﺗﻘﺎرﯾﺮوزارة اﻟﺼﺤﺔ اﻟﻔﻠﺴﻄﯿﻨﯿﺔ ﺑﻐﺰة. أﻣﺎاﻟﻮﻓﯿﺎتاﻹﺿﺎﻓﯿﺔ ﻏﯿﺮ اﻟﻨﺎﺟﻤﺔ ﻋﻦ أﻋﻤﺎلاﻟﻌﻨﻒ،ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻮﻧﮭﺎﻟﯿﺴﺖ ﻗﻠﯿﻠﺔ،ﻓﺈﻧﮭﺎأﻗﻞ ﺑﻜﺜﯿﺮ ﻣﻤﺎورد ﻓﻲﺑﻌﺾ اﻟﺘﻮﻗﻌﺎت.ﺗﻮﺿﺢ ھﺬه اﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞإﻣﻜﺎﻧﯿﺔﺗﻮﺛﯿﻖ أﻋﺪاداﻟﻮﻓﯿﺎت ﻓﻲ ﻣﻨﺎطﻖ اﻟﻨﺰاع اﻟﻨﺸﻄﺔ وﺗﻮﻓﺮ أﺳﺴﺎ ﺗﺠﺮﯾﺒﯿﺔﻗﻮﯾﺔﻟﺘﻘﯿﯿﻢ اﻟﺘﻜﻠﻔﺔ اﻟﺒﺸﺮﯾﺔ اﻟﺤﻘﯿﻘﯿﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﺮب.

اﻟﺘﻤﻮﯾﻞ:

ﻗﺎم ﺑﺘﻤﻮﯾﻞاﻟﺪراﺳﺔﻣﻌﮭﺪ أﺑﺤﺎث اﻟﺴﻼم ﻓﻲ أوﺳﻠﻮ وﻣﺮﻛﺰ أﺑﺤﺎث وﺑﺎﺋﯿﺎت اﻟﻜﻮارث ﻓﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻟﻮﻓﺎن اﻟﻜﺎﺛﻮﻟﯿﻜﯿﺔ. "ھﺬه اﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﺔ اﻟﻌﺮﺑﯿﺔ ﻣُﻘﺪﱠﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ اﻟﻤﺆﻟﻔﯿﻦ، وﻧﺤﻦ ﻧﻌﯿﺪ ﻧﺸﺮھﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ وردت. ﻟﻢ ﺗﺨﻀﻊ ھﺬه اﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﻟﻤﺮاﺟﻌﺔ اﻷﻗﺮان. ﻟﻘﺪ طُﺒِّﻘﺖاﻹﺟﺮاءات اﻟﺘﺤﺮﯾﺮﯾﺔ ﻟﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﻻﻧﺴﺖ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﻨﺴﺨﺔ اﻷﺻﻠﯿﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﺔ اﻹﻧﺠﻠﯿﺰﯾﺔ، واﻟﺘﻲ ﯾﻨﺒﻐﻲ اﻋﺘﻤﺎدھﺎ ﻣﺮﺟﻌًﺎ ﻟﮭﺬه اﻟﻤﺨﻄﻮطﺔ."

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
 
 

Leave KS as soon as possible!

view more: next ›