he does suck, like, a lot. I know the principled libertarian thing gives him a few sympathy points but my god is this guy a pathos laden idiot
7bicycles
This dude is like Forrester for MTBs if anything. Actual Forrester was way too urbanism-headed to think of "bicycle to cross wilderness border" as a use case
I mean I'll hand it to him on that one that if you do the non-public transport stuff like roughing it through the wild that's probably really doable
You'd probably be correct, the basic premise has been around since 2013
https://news.mit.edu/2013/new-system-uses-low-power-wi-fi-signal-to-track-moving-humans-0628

incredible, there's 2 guys who think trump has the mandate of heaven and they're at odds as to why
the mfer was wearing glasse and he still couldn't see how that'd've made a better example. People write and draw with straight up charcoal you hack fraud
nope sorry hope he gets sued for enviromental crimes
I swear to god if the IT people built infrastrructure for ten thousand people the way software gets built we'd all be dead
The problem with getting the BBQ dads over to stalinism on the grounds of meat prices is the blowback when you do climate stalinism and ban meat
the swiss have solved this issue by calling it a velo. we could also return to velocipéde. Not the bicycles fault everyone got that one wrong
Going by the 1968 vienna contract definition which is still in effect: yeah
"any vehicle which has at least two wheels and is propelled solely by the muscular energy of the persons on that vehicle, in particular by means of pedals or hand-cranks."
caveat for the electric motor that only supports you pedaling and up to speeds of X with Watts of Y and all but yeah, that's a bicycle.
I don't even think this is amazon skirting regulations, unless you up-end the entire system you can't really define a bicycle any better. There should be more bicycles like this.

is it