this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
105 points (99.1% liked)

chapotraphouse

13956 readers
904 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cat_Daddy@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So they're going to have to scale this method way the fuck up to get to 100kw.

[–] revolut1917@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

yeah it'd be very unfeasible

[–] ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

yes, while space is cold, the vacuum means that nearly all the heat has to be shed by radiation (meaning e.g. infrared radiation, not nookyular radiation) rather than conduction & convection. so the more you scale it up, the bigger the heat sinks needed. think giant metal fins to radiate away the heat. eventually it becomes prohibitive.

interestingly, the 40KW NASA pilot project this proposal appears to be derived from is a Stirling engine, not a radioisotope thermal generator like on New Horizons, Cassini, etc.

a Stirling design converts much more of the heat to electricity than an RTG, but it has moving parts.