this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
497 points (99.6% liked)

Fuck AI

5305 readers
1286 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Pop. Pop. Pop. Pop. 🤞

[–] mech@feddit.org 61 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

He's CEO of a company that went all-in on forcing AI into everything, including all of MS internal procedures.
They made it mandatory to use Copilot for internal performance reviews and writing progress reports. All coding must start with a prompt and devs are called into meetings with HR if they don't use Copilot enough.

He's also in the position to see how little users interact with Copilot, how code quality took a nosedive, how productivity hasn't increased after investing billions, and Linux desktop market share is showing exponential growth now.

He's right to be nervous.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's a CEO, they only fail upwards, the only nervousness comes from the fact that his golden parachute might not be big as he thought.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Because the deranged pedofile they backed is tanking the dollar. Honestly guillotines are too good for these people I vote woodchipper

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 day ago

Legs first.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They're going to lose their shirts over this shit.

They're trying to force their utopian vision of robot and human slaves serving the "elite", but they need the slave's help to get there. Probably, that time will come, but not in their lifetime, and that's what's pissing them off. It's all about them--their selfish, psychopathic desires, humanity be damned. It's also why they're trying to develop immortality drugs--they see the dream of all past capitalist overlords as finally, possibly in their grasp, but they can't quite get it. They're like frustrated monkeys reaching through the cage bars and fighting each other.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

They're going to lose their shirts over this shit.

Lmao billionaires never see consequences. It will implode and millions of regular people will lose their jobs and have the tools they need blow up and stop working. But the billionaire that caused it will be just fine in the end.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Omg our path forward on how to avoid the consequences of our actions isn't aligned with our fundamental business needs of doing whatever we like with no consequences. If only my MBA training and Six Sigma/Lean Leader certs had prepared me for this. I better go post on LinkedIn about how GenZ did this.

  • someone somewhere at MS
[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 2 days ago

He is effectively saying specialised ai has a possible future and llm are a huge waste of time and money. But he doesn't know that he is saying that.

[–] homes@piefed.world 140 points 2 days ago

Hey, it’s almost as if everyone is realizing that AI is total bullshit .

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 129 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's clearly an AI bubble. Let's just pop this shit and get it over with. The sooner the market corrects, the sooner it can start recovering.

[–] Lag@piefed.world 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Ah, but don't forget about the second and third bubble.

We've had one yes. What about second bubble?

[–] MECHAGIC@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

theres more bubbles? ☹️

[–] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

These things come in cycles.

six months after the bubble "pops" someone will come up with an AI that can grind minecraft for you or whatever, and that'll spark a whole new wave of interest in "robust independant agents" until companies realise that's also not worth 500 trillion

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They should. Fuck, AI doesn't even need to implode for them to get bent. I'm forced to do some stuff with it at work for 'research'. Copilot is the worst of the worst. I don't know how they could fork GPT and come up with an even worse product, but there they are.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t know how they could fork GPT and come up with an even worse product, but there they are.

That's a Microsoft specialty... have you seen Edge lately?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Lately, no. I had switched to them from Chrome for vanilla testing assuming Microsoft was less able to market my data. Had it running in Linux, no less.

Then they dedicated to dropping manifest v2. YEET

I saw the rebranded o365 to copilot, Making the one last product that some people still had an appetite for look incredibly unappealing.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 67 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Let’s ask Bob Kelso about AI

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 53 points 2 days ago (18 children)

If you need a new type of nuclear reactor to power your shit it means your shit is too complicated.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There are plenty of things that are complicated and could use a new type of nuclear reactor.

Training LLMs just didn't seem to be one of them

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 57 points 2 days ago

He's the guy gonna be left holding the biggest bucket of slop

[–] Shameless@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It only takes one of these large companies to walk away for everyone else to panic and the bubble will burst. I really hope MS takes a step away from it and actually tries to innovate something.

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Apple has been dragging their heels on AI from the start. They got sued by shareholders for not having enough AI in their products fast enough. Makes me wonder if they smelled the shit from the start and have been half-assing it on purpose.

Microsoft has been the opposite. If both of them shrug and say “I guess we’ll just have slightly better digital assistants”, the market might wake up and go “oh, shit.”

I think OpenAI and Anthropic could get ~~bailed~~ bought by MS/Apple/Google in a fire sale. Grok will just suck it or get propped up by Trump.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 15 points 2 days ago

Having just paid Google a billion for them to back Siri, it seems like Apple's play is to have the tick box feature but not develop it themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Once those companies will be held responsible for everything AI (copyright issues with training, resource waste and people getting harmed and killed from their output), they'll have every reason to be nervous.

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Best we can do is a government bailout

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago

Can I just say I love how Iceland treated its 2008 banking collapse? They didn't bail out anyone, but they did protect investments by people. Some banks died, losing their investors billions. People didn't lose their house or their own retirement.

This is the way we should treat all of this. Let the companies die, and let private equity take the hit for being stupid.

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

That’s not how capitalism works. Everyone else faces the consequences, the ones up top suffer nothing.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 17 points 2 days ago
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Jack-Nicholson-Nodding.gif

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Starship-troopers-Its-afraid.webm

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 2 days ago

im-doing-my-part.gif

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He is nervous because the two groups that they count on to reliably buy their shit, gamers and corporations, are seriously looking into the readily available free alternatives. If they lose them chasing AI, Microsoft is done. They have no way to recover from that.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Corporations are locked into the Azure cloud, Excel and PowerPoint.

Not copilot though.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's not as hard to become unlocked as you might think. All it takes is someone in IT knowing enough accounting to show how much they can save next quarter switching to Linux servers.

[–] ObscureOtter@piefed.ca 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

For anyone curious and lazy:

Speaking at the World Economic Forum at Davos, Switzerland on Tuesday, Nadella pontificated about what would constitute such a speculative bubble, and said that the long-term success of AI tech hinges on it being used across a broad range of industries — as well as seeing an uptick in adoption in the developing world where it’s not as popular, the Financial Times reports. If AI fails, in other words, it’s everyone else’s fault for not using it.

Nadella explained the pitfalls the AI industry would need to avoid, perhaps betraying his own anxieties about its future.

“For this not to be a bubble by definition, it requires that the benefits of this are much more evenly spread,” Nadella said, as quoted by the FT. The “tell-tale sign of if it’s a bubble,” he added, would be if only tech companies were benefitting from the rise of AI. He gave the example of a pharmaceutical company using AI to accelerate drug trials; it doesn’t need to be used to discover the “magical molecule,” but provide some other tangible, less extraordinary benefit to developing the product.

Nadella is adamant that these kinds of boosts that AI provides will justify AI and carry the industry, stressing less spectacular and more practical applications of the tech.

“I’m much more confident that this is a technology that will, in fact, build on the rails of cloud and mobile, diffuse faster, and bend the productivity curve, and bring local surplus and economic growth all around the world,” he proclaimed.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 10 points 2 days ago

I’m much more confident that this is a technology that will, in fact, build on the rails of cloud and mobile, diffuse faster, and bend the productivity curve, and bring local surplus and economic growth all around the world,” he proclaimed.

Jesus christ i want to stuff him in a locker and roll it down a hill

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thank you for being my laziness enabler. 🙏

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Nadella is adamant that these kinds of boosts that AI provides will justify AI and carry the industry, stressing less spectacular and more practical applications of the tech.

This is a huge about-face on the earlier proclamation. I really wonder what changed his mind from "AI will radically transform every industry" to "it doesn’t need to be used to discover the 'magical molecule,' but provide some other tangible, less extraordinary benefit to developing the product."

Sure, everyone here has seen the writing on the wall for years, but until now his paycheck has depended on him not seeing it. I wonder if he's getting internal pressure from some on the board of directors.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 31 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Good, maybe he'll back off on pushing this crap.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nervous that AI has been the biggest driver of people switching to linux, I did. I didnt want cortona and I certainly dont want copilot or recall

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago
[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 27 points 2 days ago

seems like, if it's bad for microsoft, it's good for humanity.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because his product isn’t winning?

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

I mean, none of them are. They're all over invested in a "product" that was DoA. And in the last few years, they've invested trillions of dollars.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 16 points 2 days ago

I love that for him.

load more comments
view more: next ›