TO POWER WHAT? WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKING MOONBASE
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
105 points (99.1% liked)
chapotraphouse
13956 readers
796 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
It's like you've never heard of extension cords
That would make the moon wrap around the earth and then we'd be stuck. Imagine it being March 12th or whatever for eternity
Source: I played tetherball in 4th grade so imagine this probably works the same
As long as we sync it up with christmas everyone will be happy, duh. You guys just keep trying to find problems with this obviously perfect plan.
How about we build a really build Tesla tower
load more comments
(3 replies)
TRUMP MOON-POWER CRYPTO - $100K MINIMUM BUY IN
load more comments
(1 replies)
Burgerland is generously going to power the Sino-Russian moonbase
to be fair ideally you want the power source up there before the moonbase goes up
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
yea sure fuck it why not
Copying China's homework from May, except China actually has the capability to do it.
Mr president, we cannot allow a lunar gap!
The lunar gap already definitively exists. China is up there bringing home samples, making a communication infrastructure to reach the far side, and about to do ISRU tests next.
good luck getting it there on one of Musk's dogcrap starships lol
ok here is my prediction. A fun little hyperstitional prophecy. I think whenever Amerikkka inevitably crumbles in the future some of the last fascists will really try to make an American government-in-exile on the moon like all those joke sci-fi Nazi stories/conspiracies.
I'm going to go with them putting a nuclear reactor on the moon but it leaks, creating radiation showers. Part of our weather forecasts is dedicated to these radiation showers and they're something we simply have to deal with forever because nobody ever goes back up there to fix it.
the chinese would, except the remnant of the US threatens them with all their nukes if they do
fortunately that's not possible so we're good. even if there was somehow enough radiation leaking from the moon to be noticeable here, it couldnt make the journey out of Luna's gravity well.
Step away from the lathe
load more comments
(1 replies)
isn't there a video game where you shoot up a nazi base on the moon. wait is that Doom?
one of the wolfenstein games
Coal for earth, nuclear for moon (supposedly) .
Look at it sparkle though, that's some Clean Coal™ right there!
Interim NASA administrator 
America can, should, must, and will blow up the moon!
btw, isn't a large volume of water, like, extremely important for nuclear reactors?
Yeah I don't know how else to use nuclear radiation to make power except by heating water into steam. I know nasa has played with tiny reactors for spacecraft, but I don't know how they work. Perhaps they have something like a solar panel sitting next to a uranium rod and it generates electricity from that instead of photons?
They take advantage of the Seebeck effect which is where a voltage is generated between two points in a conducting material when there's a temperature difference between them. Basically the nuclear material heats one piece of metal in the circuit, while another remains cold, and this produces a potential difference between the two that drives current through the circuit. Because space is very cold and nuclear materials are very hot, this produces a useful quantity of current. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator
So they're going to have to scale this method way the fuck up to get to 100kw.
yeah it'd be very unfeasible
yes, while space is cold, the vacuum means that nearly all the heat has to be shed by radiation (meaning e.g. infrared radiation, not nookyular radiation) rather than conduction & convection. so the more you scale it up, the bigger the heat sinks needed. think giant metal fins to radiate away the heat. eventually it becomes prohibitive.
interestingly, the 40KW NASA pilot project this proposal appears to be derived from is a Stirling engine, not a radioisotope thermal generator like on New Horizons, Cassini, etc.
a Stirling design converts much more of the heat to electricity than an RTG, but it has moving parts.
You can actually do without it, but it will be much more complex and several times more expensive.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Let me guess, this whole operation will be "managed" by AI.
"Just curious, are we invading Iran today?"
Bit idea: Elon manages to use all the DOGE cuts to get approval to do this and then nukes Texas when his ship blows up on the launchpad
To be fair, I think this is more than Mayo Pete ever did when he had this job
Idiot doesn't know these jobs are gifts and you're supposed to just sit and smile 
the empire's reach continues to expand more and more fantastically, even as its grasp recedes faster and faster
I'm announcing a nuclear reactor in my pants.
Well while were just saying were gonna do things I'm planning on terraforming Venus sometime next year. Anyone who wants to help hmu. Shouldnt take too long.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Watch this shit is to power ai
I don’t care who is doing it. Sending people to the moon again feels so unnecessary when you got robots.
They're gonna send a nuke to the moon and detonate it and say that's a nuclear reactor
This is just cover for putting nukes on the moon, right?
Good idea maybe the explosion won't send the moon out of orbit
What could possibly not happen?
they're going to blow up the moon
Oil found on Moon
view more: next ›