1103
submitted 2 months ago by nimomycelium@lemmy.world to c/pics@lemmy.world
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lighttrails@sh.itjust.works 99 points 2 months ago

Quick, check to see if all of the dolphins left the planet.

[-] blackluster117@possumpat.io 39 points 2 months ago

Consult the mice, they'll know what's up.

[-] KrankyKong@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Not a dolphin in sight in arizona 😥

[-] ccunix@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

None in Brittany either! This is a bad sign

[-] danekrae@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That is very British. I love it. And I bet you can just wipe it with your towel.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

The fish and chips shop closed? So sad that it should come to this.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

People have clearly stopped liking Fish and Chips.

[-] ettyblatant@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

My work cafeteria sells fish and chips but they are nowhere near as good as Fish and Chips :(

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Anybody else actually love the song from the movie?

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

Anyone who hates on the movies for being different from the books seriously misunderstands the pedigree and nature of the Hitchhiker's Guide series.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

I’ve honestly never met a fan of the books that didn’t also like the movie. I think it did a great job of appealing to fans of the book and a not so good job appealing to non fans.

[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

I never saw the movie because I never understood what value that medium would have to offer. There's just too many jokes packed into the text for it to translate into something you can watch in one sitting. It's like when they made a movie about catch-22. It's great to get the material to more audiences, but there's just no way to correctly translate it no matter how good you do it.

[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I'm a big fan of the books who didn't really like the movie. But that's partly because I'm also a huge fan of the BBC TV show so, to me, that's what HHGG should look and sound like. Particularly Peter Jones as the voice of the Book (nothing against Stephen Fry in general).

The movie had some good moments, but having Zaphod's second head beneath his first instead of beside it was a horrible idea. And the joke at the end about going in the wrong direction to the Restaurant at the End of the Universe seemed to suggest the makers thought that 'End' refers to a physical location in the universe as opposed to its chronological end point. Which annoyed me quite a bit.

It's fine though, I'm not one of these "They completely ruined it" people - there are so many different versions of HHGG what with the radio show, the books, the audio books, the TV show, and the text adventure game, that there really isn't a single definitive version. I happen to not like the film, but the rest still exist, so it's all hoopy.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I can understand these complaints. In general, though, I felt like the movie was just being a different thing while trying to stay faithful to the spirit of the book, and I loved the movie for that. It didn’t feel like the creators just wanted to cash in on a name, but genuinely liked the material and were trying to bring that to life.

It wasn’t a great movie, but as a fan of the books, I appreciate that it exists. I knew it wouldn’t happen, but I wanted the sequel.

Also, I didn’t get the feeling they misunderstand the “end” joke, I thought it was just a cute way to end the movie while name checking the potential sequel.

[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I should probably watch it again to be fair, I've not seen it in quite a while. Maybe I'd like it more this time.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I think the book has to be read before watching the movie.

[-] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 months ago

I don't hate the movie for being different from the book; I hate it for being poorly written/directed and cringey.

Now, the BBC miniseries from the 80s - that is worth watching.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

But the miniseries is just a carbon-copy of the radio programme…

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

It's a fairly close adaptation, but not the same. And even if it was, why would that affect what they said?

[-] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago

Is that a bad thing? It's a different medium that can reach a much wider audience. I'd bet that at least 80% of people who enjoy the BBC miniseries have never heard of the radio program.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

It’s kind of neutral in my opinion.

It would have been better if it varied more from the radio show as the books did, and the special effects were largely cringeworthy if a product of the time and budget. The animations were very good though.

My point was that it doesn’t particularly support the idea that all the different versions have been drastically different.

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I thout that's what people meant by the film…

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

My only problem with the movie was it didn't have an infinite number of monkeys outside who want to talk to us about this script for Hamlet they've worked out.

[-] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 2 points 2 months ago

The amount of pants-shitting about the film from people who'd only read the books (probably not even all of them) was, well… predictable

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Especially crazy when Douglas Adams has a writing credit on the screenplay, and all indications are that he was substantially involved in it's contents.

Edit:

The script we shot was very much based on the last draft that Douglas wrote... All the substantive new ideas in the movie... are brand new Douglas ideas written especially for the movie by him... Douglas was always up for reinventing HHGG in each of its different incarnations and he knew that working harder on some character development and some of the key relationships was an integral part of turning HHGG into a movie.

- Robbie Stamp, Executive Producer
[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

It's funny when people say that the original book was better. When the book itself is just an adaptation from the original radio play

While I have my nitpicks with the movie, overall I adore it. Especially Marvin's design

[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This scene is an absolute classic.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Is the song from the miniseries? I’ve never seen it.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

The "So Long And Thanks For All The Fish" theme was compressed for the 2005 movie.

Both the movie and TV miniseries use "Journey of the Sorcerer" by The Eagles as an instrumental theme song.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I somehow never had come across any of them until I heard the theme song after a Flogging Molly concert, they used to play it every time when they exited it seemed. Second time I heard it I looked up where it was from.

[-] FollyDolly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I do! It's one of my favorite parts. I read the books long before I saw the movie and I enjoyed them both. Didn't really get all the hate for it to be honest.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 8 points 2 months ago

There's a theory that every new telling of the story is different because the Heart of Gold's infinite improbability drive simply found similarly infinitely improbable results

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Somebody get Wonko the Sane on the phone. He's the one with the house that looks like the inside of an insane asylum on the outside.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Did they close down because the crackheads who laid those pavers and bricks kept stealing their vinegar and snorting their tartar sauce?

[-] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago

Bravissimo, hip hip hooray. What a glorious display.

[-] Baggins@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

Mind and body blown away

What a radiant crescendo

[-] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago

I love that someone got the reference!

[-] Baggins@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Another band that I've picked up on courtesy of Radio Paradise

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

It's about time, with the way things are going, the Vogon construction fleet can't arrive fast enough. Unfortunately, they must have realized this making their naturally bureaucratic nature delay correspondingly.

[-] Slovene@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago
[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Don't worry, you can still go to the Chip shop.

[-] Donebrach@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Did Happy write this?

[-] robocall@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
1103 points (99.5% liked)

pics

19537 readers
389 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS