mkwt

joined 2 years ago
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No. She took this case to a grand jury for indictment, but the jurors voted 24-0 to reject the charges.

Pirro can try again with a different grand jury at any time, but has now elected not to.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Is it still possible to get him out of the line of succession by forcing him to convert to Catholicism?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

And this is why ICE is shooting themselves a lot more than they used to.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Seems like it might have an interference problem with the forward assist.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

A large chunk of that space in LA is called "the Florida parishes" because they were part of the Florida territory before they were a part of Louisiana.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That painting should be old enough to be in the public domain. (Although photographs thereof get their own copyright terms.)

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That could be a tricky legal question. The current law is that changes in the line of succession must be approved by all 15 Commonwealth realms. But this law was itself a regular statute passed by the Westminster parliament.

The principle of parliamentary supremacy demands that no parliament may bind the will of a future parliament. That is, could Westminster just override the 1931 statute when they pass this special "cut out Andrew" bill? There might not be a whole lot that says they can't.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Saturn V first stage ran RP-1, a kerosene fuel like Jet-A or JP8.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The Presidential immunity does not extend to the President's underlings, such as DHS Secretary Noem, or the CBP officer that actually collected a tariff from you.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

This is the look of a man who has had a day. (He was released with no charge after questioning.)

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I'd be on board with reactivating the Tower.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Interesting because factions in Belfast use those exact colors.

 

A lawyer working with the Minnesota attorney’s office said she just wants some sleep, after working so hard to try to get ICE to follow court orders.

“I wish you would just hold me in contempt of court so I can get 24 hours of sleep,” Le said. “The system sucks, this job sucks, I am trying with every breath I have to get you what I need.”

Edit clarification: This attorney works for the federal government, not the State of Minnesota.

 

Over the weekend, Judge Nachmanoff made it clear that a large amount of discovery material is to be delivered to James Comey today. The prosecution team from North Carolina seem to be engaging in a series of stall tactics to delay this.

The eastern district of Virginia is known informally as the "rocket docket" because of its fast resolution times for cases.

 

While sitting for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit that she filed, Laura Loomer was asked to explain under oath what she meant by the phrase "Arby's in her pants" (which she earlier penned in a tweet).

Transcript:

Q  Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, Arby's --
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A  Arby's sells roast beef.
Q  Right.  Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q  What is the expression trying to convey?
A  It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q  Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A  Yeah.
Q  She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there?  You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous.  I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants.  Yes.
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q  You're not making a slur about her?
A  No.
Q  You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A  Yes.  That's correct.  That's correct.
Q  Why are you laughing?
A  Because I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I just think it's so funny.  I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q  What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
view more: next ›