mkwt

joined 2 years ago
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Hey,

The Air Force has experience with balloons now.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Update: It now seems possible that the "cartel drones" may have actually been party balloons.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (8 children)

Rumor I heard is that the military is planning to start testing some counter drone system, and in discussions with FAA, they couldn't promise that civilian flights would be safe, so FAA pulled out the big gun.

It sounds like this counter drone system would only be for use on drones that cross the river into us airspace, but I'm not sure of that.

For reference, the US has operated an Air Defense Identification Zone for a long time, that covers Mexican airspace near the border. The air force tries to identify, track, and sometimes intercept all air traffic in the ADIZ. Civilian air traffic is supposed to be on a filed flight plan, in communication with ATC, and have an assigned four digit transponder code. Failure to do so may result in interception by scrambled aircraft.

I would imagine that "cartel drones" in or around Juarez would not be doing the above. But there may also be too many of them to economically intercept with F15s.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

The job of a lawyer is to persuade powerful people that he is right.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I think it's one, 24 cup (6 quarts, 1.5 gallon), cupholder.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not even. ed is The Standard Editor.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 45 points 4 days ago (1 children)

this department has sent our best and brightest officers to Harvard, hoping the university would better understand and appreciate our warrior class,

That's, uh, not why DoD occasionally sends officers to Harvard and other elite universities. DoD does this because they want some of their officers to have high quality advanced degrees.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

I've heard that Trump was too scared to say the line to people's face, so he pre-recorded it.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Also, the man is not his son.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Update: the government fired the attorney the next day, so she can at least get some sleep.

(The judge declined to grant her request for contempt.)

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

By using quantum sensor-driven magnetic navigation

So, like a compass? "Quantum" probably means they're using a (pretty new) solid state optical sensing mechanism. Remember, everything is "quantum" inside a silicon wafer.

Meanwhile, MEMS magnetometers have been standard in commercial AHRS equipment for quite a while, and it's pretty standard to integrate the data into a navigational solution with other sensors.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (4 children)

As far as I can tell, this man is guilty of allowing people to use his bathroom if they ask nicely.

 

A lawyer working with the Minnesota attorney’s office said she just wants some sleep, after working so hard to try to get ICE to follow court orders.

“I wish you would just hold me in contempt of court so I can get 24 hours of sleep,” Le said. “The system sucks, this job sucks, I am trying with every breath I have to get you what I need.”

Edit clarification: This attorney works for the federal government, not the State of Minnesota.

 

Over the weekend, Judge Nachmanoff made it clear that a large amount of discovery material is to be delivered to James Comey today. The prosecution team from North Carolina seem to be engaging in a series of stall tactics to delay this.

The eastern district of Virginia is known informally as the "rocket docket" because of its fast resolution times for cases.

 

While sitting for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit that she filed, Laura Loomer was asked to explain under oath what she meant by the phrase "Arby's in her pants" (which she earlier penned in a tweet).

Transcript:

Q  Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, Arby's --
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A  Arby's sells roast beef.
Q  Right.  Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q  What is the expression trying to convey?
A  It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q  Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A  Yeah.
Q  She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there?  You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous.  I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants.  Yes.
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q  You're not making a slur about her?
A  No.
Q  You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A  Yes.  That's correct.  That's correct.
Q  Why are you laughing?
A  Because I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I just think it's so funny.  I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q  What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
view more: next ›