The text of the deal hasn't been released. No terms in a joint communiqué. The only information we have on what's in this deal is coming from the social media posts and anonymous background sources.
I wouldn't be surprised if they haven't actually closed on a final text yet.
What's going to happen is:
"You see, it's just too dangerous to humanity to experiment with AI at home. You need to use a safe provider like Open AI."
if they don't know the expression to table that [idea] for now. Greenbeards sonetimes get confused by tabling used as a verb. I think it's unintuitive.
This one is tricky because it goes opposite ways across the pond. In the UK Parliament to table a bill means they're going to bring it up for consideration right now. In fact bills and motions under consideration are actually laid out on that central table in the House of Commons.
In US Congress, a motion to lay on the table is a request to halt consideration on a bill for an indefinite (and probably infinite) period. There is no physical table in the US Congress where dead bills are placed.
I've done a thousand "real" lines in a day, but it was like a 10 hour "day," and it was just coding for the entire period. No emails, no meetings, no peer reviews, no debugging. No design or architecture work--that was all done on a previous day.
And obviously all of that code did get tested and debugged and reviewed, but on a different day. So I can't really say that those lines were "completed" in one day.
Where the heck are those "I did that" stickers?
Wow, that's a lot of veins.
TNG was filmed on 35mm, so it's possible to get high definition remasters without AI. I don't know about this picture. Apparently, I was too late to see it.
It doesn't disqualify you from the FBI any more.
The man said it under oath, so it must be true. 100%.
Lighting still really hard, yo.
The details were all on media blackout.
Most of the big death camps were deliberately located in the "east," mainly in Poland. This kept them out of "civilized" Germany, where they could raise a stink. Nazi ideology viewed all Slavs, including Poles, as sub human, but with various degrees of sub-humanness, depending on their ridiculous criteria. That gave them a "justification" for locating the mass murder in Eastern Europe.
Of course, your average German knew that all the local Jews in his local area had disappeared in a process at some point. But if he kept his nose out of the ugly business, he didn't need to be bothered with the particulars of what happened to them.
For a while the Nazi party was advertising it was going to set up a Jewish colony in Madagascar, or some other nonsense. Meanwhile, the true nature of the Final Solution was never publicly announced, and Adolf Hitler never signed his name to any policy paper or order on it.
Late in the war, when they were losing ground fast, the Nazis took many steps to destroy records and evidence of their atrocities. They very well knew that what they were doing was wrong.
In contrast, the US federal government publishes statistical reports with total numbers of immigration arrests, detentions, and deportations, including by country. Individual immigration detainees can be located to a specific facility at any time using a government website, where they can be contacted by telephone and where they have the constitutional right to meet with their attorney. And while there are a bunch of problems with the website working right or glitching out, it usually is reported to work correctly much of the time. And while many immigration lawyers have alleged that ICE is shuffling their clients around the country to make it hard to reach them, these specific problems do get attention and usually some resolution from the courts.
In short, while the current US deportation campaign is inhumane, immoral, and illegal (in some ways at least), it is not comparable in any way, shape, or manner to the Holocaust. There is enough public transparency into the federal government's operations, and enough people watching, to know that.
There is an active preliminary injunction in this case preventing Paramount from closing the deal pending the outcome of the trial.
In this situation, the law does provide for an injunction bond to cover costs of compliance if the injunction is later overturned.
The amount, of course, can be argued about.
While sitting for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit that she filed, Laura Loomer was asked to explain under oath what she meant by the phrase "Arby's in her pants" (which she earlier penned in a tweet).
Transcript:
Q Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A Well, Arby's --
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A Arby's sells roast beef.
Q Right. Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q What is the expression trying to convey?
A It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A Yeah.
Q She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there? You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous. I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants. Yes.
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q You're not making a slur about her?
A No.
Q You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A Yes. That's correct. That's correct.
Q Why are you laughing?
A Because I just think it's so funny.
Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A I just think it's so funny. I just think it's so funny.
Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
There was one particular morning in 2014 when Google dropped articles from The Daily Stormer directly into the personalized news feed widget on my phone. I grew up in the South, so I know the ins and outs of racism there. This was completely different. It was wildly genocidal anti-Semitism; straight up Nazi shit. Right there on my phone and presented as news.
That's when I knew that something was seriously wrong.