mkwt

joined 2 years ago
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 29 points 9 hours ago

Per the FDA definition, a medical device is a device that is intended to diagnose or to treat a disease.

So I guess these chest binders are treating a disease after all. Which I wonder what disease that might be?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Devices 2-7 are available as various pieces of hardware if you have the hardware.

It doesn't say this, but I suspect that disks received a higher default number than printers because the 1541 disk drive went to market after several printers were already on the market.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I can somehow hear this lyric.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There was a Nova episode in the 1970s that was dedicated to a crazy rich guy's hare-brained scheme to mine minerals off of the sea floor.

Then, about thirty years later another Nova episode revealed that the mining scheme from the earlier episode was a CIA cover story to cover up for a top secret claw game operation to lift a sunken Soviet submarine off of the sea floor.

So I guess the first one was fake news.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's worse than that. In C++, if you fail to catch an exception, then std::terminate() is called. In Rust the only options are roughly equivalent to C++ noexcept, or std::terminate() [panic in Rust]. There's nothing in between.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Rust has many container-like objects that may or may contain a value, like Box. Most of these have an unwrap() method that either obtains the inner value or panics the whole application.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think this article is about the downgrade, not the reversal that happened later.

Basically, it's old news.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago

Fentanyl the WMD is all over every hospital and nursing home in America. Time to send in the UN inspectors and set up the no fly zones.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But, but, the other terminal on those batteries is floating?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, the same novel has Bond challenging the villain to a very high stakes game of....contract bridge. Just saying...

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's usually the case that federal judges did not fall off the turnip truck yesterday.

In this case the actual order says to turn over all copies. It also says to deposit one copy at the federal court, which the feds can access if they apply for and obtain a lawful search warrant.

If the feds are found to be holding onto copies later, they can get in a bunch of trouble. More importantly, they can no longer publish these emails as exhibits in a hypothetical future prosecution, like they did with Comey. Because as soon as they do, it's all "hey where did you get those from?"

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

The crazy thing is we now have algorithms that can do the CSI "enhance!" thing. But it's still just making shit up that seems plausible.

Once the information is no longer in the image, it's not there. No amount of fuckery will bring back the real information.

 

Over the weekend, Judge Nachmanoff made it clear that a large amount of discovery material is to be delivered to James Comey today. The prosecution team from North Carolina seem to be engaging in a series of stall tactics to delay this.

The eastern district of Virginia is known informally as the "rocket docket" because of its fast resolution times for cases.

 

While sitting for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit that she filed, Laura Loomer was asked to explain under oath what she meant by the phrase "Arby's in her pants" (which she earlier penned in a tweet).

Transcript:

Q  Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, Arby's --
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A  Arby's sells roast beef.
Q  Right.  Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q  What is the expression trying to convey?
A  It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q  Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A  Yeah.
Q  She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there?  You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous.  I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants.  Yes.
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q  You're not making a slur about her?
A  No.
Q  You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A  Yes.  That's correct.  That's correct.
Q  Why are you laughing?
A  Because I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I just think it's so funny.  I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q  What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
view more: next ›