mkwt

joined 2 years ago
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Achtung! likely originates from the same era, propagating through allied machine shops during WWII. And I've seen that in the wild.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

They're doing this because success would set up factual predicates to support invoking the Insurrection Act. The Insurrection Act is invokable when state governments are actively disobeying federal law.

They're not invoking the Insurrection Act right at this moment, because with the facts they have right now, they're not confident they'll win the case in court. (And they may also lose a voting majority in Congress on the matter.)

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Folks, yet another Kavanaugh stop for your edification.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

ICE has thrown out their sit-up requirement because they can't find recruits who can do sit-ups.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 93 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Windows does, in fact, have signals. They're just not all the same as Unix signals, and the behavior is different. Here's a write-up.

You're correct there is no "please terminate but you don't have to" signal in Windows. Windowless processes sometimes make up their own nonstandard events to implement the functionality. As you mentioned, windowed processes have WM_CLOSE.

Memory access violations (akin to SIGSEGV), and other system exceptions can be handled through Structured Exception Handling.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Haha, fixed now. Thanks.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Counterpoint: time. Even playing simple lines, there's a big difference between a groove that is completely locked in, and one that is not. And that difference is all about the precise timing of the hits between the players in the rhythm section. The bass sets the foundation of all of that.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

I think a child porn distributor tried to hide his face using that swirl tool. And he found out that Photoshop will unswirl it quite happily.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I can believe they have resistance plans for the really batshit scenarios.

But passively denying nukes or whatever is a heck of a lot better than actively starting shit in DC. That would be a dark road to go down.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here's some explanation of the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine.

New York State is a sovereign state that derives original sovereign power from the citizens of New York. Meanwhile, the United States is also an original sovereign power that derives its power from the entire people of the United States. (Remember, the Constitution is established by "we, the People". The U.S. is not just an agreement between individual states). Both governments have original power over the geographic territory of New York. The regular powers of government are split between the two according to the terms of the Constitution.

Thus, New York State can exercise its General Police Power to prosecute Mr. Mangione for murder. This power is not granted by the Constitution, but it is recognized by the Constitution. The United States government can simultaneously exercise its power to Regulate Interstate Commerce, by prosecuting Mr. Mangione for the crime of "interstate stalking that caused the death of a person."

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

That's actually just stealing power from the sun from hundreds of millions of years ago.

 

Over the weekend, Judge Nachmanoff made it clear that a large amount of discovery material is to be delivered to James Comey today. The prosecution team from North Carolina seem to be engaging in a series of stall tactics to delay this.

The eastern district of Virginia is known informally as the "rocket docket" because of its fast resolution times for cases.

 

While sitting for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit that she filed, Laura Loomer was asked to explain under oath what she meant by the phrase "Arby's in her pants" (which she earlier penned in a tweet).

Transcript:

Q  Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, Arby's --
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A  Arby's sells roast beef.
Q  Right.  Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q  What is the expression trying to convey?
A  It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q  Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A  Yeah.
Q  She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there?  You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous.  I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants.  Yes.
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q  You're not making a slur about her?
A  No.
Q  You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A  Yes.  That's correct.  That's correct.
Q  Why are you laughing?
A  Because I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I just think it's so funny.  I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q  What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
view more: next ›