I hereby sentence him to APA Lawsuit.
mkwt
joined 3 years ago
That's, uh, not what the article says.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Friday that immigrants from Muslim-majority countries must recognize Germany's historical responsibility for the Holocaust or leave the country,
(Emphasis added.)
It's like a Four Seasons situation. Nobody can admit that he fucked up.
It's not just a rebrand. It's an attempt to invoke National Security Concerns (TM) in the arch lawsuit. And then they'll say the the judicial branch should not scrutinize the National Security determinations of the Executive branch.
and the separation of affidavit ballots could result in ballots being separated from their envelopes, putting voters' right to a secret ballot in jeopardy, said the Colom campaign.
This seems like it's not accurate. As long as ballots are in the envelopes, their contents can be associated with the individual, right?
The normal procedure is to verify the voter's eligibility without looking at the ballot inside the envelope. Then, if eligibility is accepted, tear the flap off the envelope and mix it with a bunch of similar envelopes. Then open the envelopes and count the ballots after they have been separated from the identifying information.
Be more disturbed that the Minuteman III missiles, one leg of the nuclear triad, rely on the big 8 inch floppies in their launch control systems.
The replacement missiles will not enter service until the "early 2030s."
All those people who were just elected need to step up and keep their eyes on the ball. Because there's still at least two quarters of antifash left to play.
Houston mayor signs order to limit cooperation with ICE, says 'elections matter' after Democrats win
Fuck Whitmire. He could have signed this order any time before the election, but he didn't.
And then he went ripping up bike lanes that we had already paid good money to install. How the heck does that make any damn sense?
Making Attorneys Get Attorneys.
I wonder if she is concerned about that.
I think the whole strategy is to win the provisional ballot fight and get the secretary of state to trigger a recount on the main ballots and hope that recount goes really well for them and shutdown any further recounting after that and then somehow keep the provisionals from ever being counted.
I think it's a lot of hopium.
28
U.S. Taxpayers Have Paid At Least $1.1 Million in Attorneys' Fees to Unlawfully Detained Immigrants
(www.courthousenews.com)
While sitting for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit that she filed, Laura Loomer was asked to explain under oath what she meant by the phrase "Arby's in her pants" (which she earlier penned in a tweet).
Transcript:
Q Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A Well, Arby's --
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A Arby's sells roast beef.
Q Right. Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q What is the expression trying to convey?
A It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A Yeah.
Q She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there? You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous. I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants. Yes.
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q You're not making a slur about her?
A No.
Q You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A Yes. That's correct. That's correct.
Q Why are you laughing?
A Because I just think it's so funny.
Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A I just think it's so funny. I just think it's so funny.
Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
view more: next ›
As the article is written, it appears that Merz responded to this question with a non-answer, as politicians will sometimes do. Instead of responding directly, he went on an extended tangent about German law on Holocaust denial, which applies to German immigrants as equally as to native Germans.
And to be clear the Holocaust these laws are about is a set of events that occurred in Germany and German-controlled territory from 1933-1945. It is illegal in Germany to deny the truth that 6 million Jews and a number of others were murdered by the government during that time.