mkwt

joined 2 years ago
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

I think the 0.25c claim is mostly Technical Manual content and not on-screen canon. The manual also claims that the stardate calendar is designed to cope with time dilation and relativity of simultaneity issues.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Usually in these stories, Batman or whoever leaves behind enough evidence to support a successful prosecution, along with the tied-up bag guy.

The vigilante broke the law to gain evidence, so all the evidence the vigilante obtained would be thrown out,

That's actually an interesting situation. The fourth and fifth amendments put restrictions on the government, not private vigilantes. So if the cops just happen to find evidence in plain view, there won't be a direct constitutional reason to suppress it.

Now if the local prosecutor has a pattern or practice of deliberately turning a blind eye to the unlicensed private investigators that routinely supply them with illegally obtained information, there's probably a claim there. But it's a lot more complicated to make that case than a straight-up 4th amendment case.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Yep. All of the unmanned stuff is a real bargain.

I think Hubble was even cheaper too, but Hubble was a hand me down spy sat from NRO.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (6 children)

$200 billion is $50 billion more than the entire program cost of the International Space Station, which is claimed to be the most expensive single object ever constructed.

ISS delivers manned orbital habitation at a rate of $7.5 million per astronaut-day, which is less than half what Skylab cost.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Or even just 9 months ago, when he told the leader of Germany that D-Day "was not a pleasant day for you."

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

120 giga-grand-pianos-per-football-field.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Japan actually tried to coordinate a formal declaration of war to be submitted immediately before the attack commenced. But due to technical and logistical problems, the communique was not read by American diplomats until after the attack.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This syndicated comic strip ran in a bunch of main line newspapers yesterday. You have to understand it's pretty wild for these big, mainstream comic strips to dip into politics if that's not what they usually do. When Doonesbury went "too far", he got moved to the opinion page in a bunch of papers.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure she was fired before quitting.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Context: the man was dying because the cops shot him.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Both options are better than private event spaces, which a lot of them are

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The Syrian deployments were covered by the 2001 AUMF. But that AUMF has finally been repealed now. It would be a serious escalation in claimed presidential powers to send ground forces into anything longer than approximately Grenada.

 

A lawyer working with the Minnesota attorney’s office said she just wants some sleep, after working so hard to try to get ICE to follow court orders.

“I wish you would just hold me in contempt of court so I can get 24 hours of sleep,” Le said. “The system sucks, this job sucks, I am trying with every breath I have to get you what I need.”

Edit clarification: This attorney works for the federal government, not the State of Minnesota.

 

Over the weekend, Judge Nachmanoff made it clear that a large amount of discovery material is to be delivered to James Comey today. The prosecution team from North Carolina seem to be engaging in a series of stall tactics to delay this.

The eastern district of Virginia is known informally as the "rocket docket" because of its fast resolution times for cases.

 

While sitting for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit that she filed, Laura Loomer was asked to explain under oath what she meant by the phrase "Arby's in her pants" (which she earlier penned in a tweet).

Transcript:

Q  Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, Arby's --
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A  Arby's sells roast beef.
Q  Right.  Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q  What is the expression trying to convey?
A  It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q  Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A  Yeah.
Q  She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there?  You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous.  I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants.  Yes.
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q  You're not making a slur about her?
A  No.
Q  You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A  Yes.  That's correct.  That's correct.
Q  Why are you laughing?
A  Because I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I just think it's so funny.  I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q  What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
view more: next ›