It sounds like they sent two full vials into her arm muscles and just about anywhere else in her body except the blood system.
mkwt
joined 3 years ago
My understanding is they got two whole vials of pentobarbital into her. But she had previously warned in one of her legal challenges that a pre-existing medical condition would prevent the one drug protocol from working on her.
They're not really being dishonest, per se. They're just bullshitters spouting bullshit. They don't care about true or false. Because the truth does not appear in the objective functions they are optimizing.
Your thumbprint or face ID can also be "searched". But your unlock code is testimony, for which you have the right to remain silent.
The witness is Jack Smith, who used to be the federal prosecutor in charge of prosecuting Donald Trump.
The Atlanta Hawks are a professional NBA mens basketball team that play their home games in Atlanta, Georgia.
The Senator was trying to prove that Jack Smith secretly had a meeting with Fani Willis in Atlanta, who was a Georgia state's attorney in charge of prosecuting Donald Trump on a different case. The Senator found a reference to the "Hawks" in Jack Smith's text messages. He felt that this alone proved that Smith had met Willis.
There was just one little problem. The text message was actually about the Iowa Hawkeyes, a college womens basketball team. Jack Smith had actually attended a Hawkeyes game against U of Maryland in Maryland. At that game he saw Caitlin Clark score 38 points and 12 assists.
Jack Smith testified he is a fan of Caitlin Clark, and he never visited Atlanta in the 2024 time frame, unless he was just passing through the airport.
Fun fact: there's a pho place in town that will sell you straight pork blood to eat. It comes in a bucket with a USDA inspection stamp.
For a long time I was really confused about what is so bad about the Atlanta Hawks that you might need an alibi to go see them.
It turns out that the second part of this wacko's conspiracy theory is that Jack Smith used the Atlanta Hawks (which, again, Smith never actually went to) as a cover to secretly meet with Georgia prosecutor Fani Willis.
Absolutely no evidence as to this "meeting" with Willis was presented whatsoever.
There was an actual NASA project that briefly claimed to have detected some miniscule accelerations driven only by EM waves. I think these claims were later lost to measurement error.
See the wiki:
NASA Eagleworks reported small thrust under vacuum.[70] Tajmar et al. (2022): no thrust across wide frequency band; any anomalous signal below photon-thrust limit by at least two orders of magnitude.[21]: 31, 42–43
Mumble, something. Magnets do no work. Mumble, mumble.
Way back before the Jesus era, back in the time of Solomon, there's some modern scholarship that claims evidence that Asherah was worshipped at the Jerusalem temple as the consort of Yahweh. And this worship would have included sacred temple prostitutes.
I don't know if that's related to what you're talking about or not.
28
U.S. Taxpayers Have Paid At Least $1.1 Million in Attorneys' Fees to Unlawfully Detained Immigrants
(www.courthousenews.com)
While sitting for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit that she filed, Laura Loomer was asked to explain under oath what she meant by the phrase "Arby's in her pants" (which she earlier penned in a tweet).
Transcript:
Q Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A Well, Arby's --
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A Arby's sells roast beef.
Q Right. Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q What is the expression trying to convey?
A It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A Yeah.
Q She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there? You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous. I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants. Yes.
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q You're not making a slur about her?
A No.
Q You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A Yes. That's correct. That's correct.
Q Why are you laughing?
A Because I just think it's so funny.
Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A I just think it's so funny. I just think it's so funny.
Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
view more: next ›
How the heck do you cross examine that?