mkwt

joined 3 years ago
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The direct federal supremacy argument seems like a long shot to me. For example, the fire code is also enforced by the state of Colorado. Does GEO Group claim to be exempt from the fire code?

There's a federal law that grants fed contractors protection from state liability when they are performing their federal contracts. But only when they are performing to the fed's requirements and specifications. Does this law matter here? Is this a "protection from liability" or an "exemption from regulation?" Is it going to matter whether GEO is following the specs or not? I don't know.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In the world of nuclear weapons, there's a big difference between "I have nuclear weapons," and "I will be able to get nuclear weapons soon."

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

New York Times reported that no sounds of power tools were heard, and it appeared that the lettering was simply removed by hand.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Yes. Those dark spots are plains of actually darker rocks, specifically basalts. That generally means that those are dried out lava fields.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

To be clear to everyone here: The primary reason why Artemis 3 is not landing is because the billionaire-run Human Landing System contractors are not performing to schedule. The landers are just not ready.

In this test, Artemis 3 will dock with a starship in Earth orbit, but the starship will not even have a cabin interior fitted.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Artemis 3 is going ahead with no landing either. Orbital test only.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But the presidential alerts are very rare, and are actually designed for nuclear war. They're tied into all of the continuity of government machinery. I've never actually seen one.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I think the numbers were proportional, or at least proportionate, back in May of 2022 when this was created.

Oh! To recall the carefree days when the special 3-day military operation was only around 90 days old.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've been told a fun thing to do in Rome is to walk up to one of the tourist trap restaurants that has a tout at the door. Those guys know like 5 or 6 different languages, and they try to lure unsuspecting tourists to sit down at their restaurant. Anyhow, the play is to walk up to one of these touts and to start speaking Classical Latin at them. Latin is close enough to several Romance languages they do know that it seems familiar, but it's not quite intelligible. And it's really confusing to them to figure out which one you are speaking.

Of course it helps if you're conversational in Latin.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In any case, whatever the scheme is, it should be voted upon by our Congressional representatives in Congress and enacted by Congress, and signed into law by the President. That is how the H1-B visa was created in the first place, and that is how taxes are raised in this country: with representation.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

imagine they reclaim all the territory except the Gadsden purchase, which becomes an exclave.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the reality is that these admissions and scholarship committees were well aware these were the Lopez offspring. And I imagine they're counting on getting more money back in future donations and from extra buzz and interest generated if these celebrities actually matriculate.

 

A lawyer working with the Minnesota attorney’s office said she just wants some sleep, after working so hard to try to get ICE to follow court orders.

“I wish you would just hold me in contempt of court so I can get 24 hours of sleep,” Le said. “The system sucks, this job sucks, I am trying with every breath I have to get you what I need.”

Edit clarification: This attorney works for the federal government, not the State of Minnesota.

 

Over the weekend, Judge Nachmanoff made it clear that a large amount of discovery material is to be delivered to James Comey today. The prosecution team from North Carolina seem to be engaging in a series of stall tactics to delay this.

The eastern district of Virginia is known informally as the "rocket docket" because of its fast resolution times for cases.

 

While sitting for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit that she filed, Laura Loomer was asked to explain under oath what she meant by the phrase "Arby's in her pants" (which she earlier penned in a tweet).

Transcript:

Q  Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, Arby's --
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A  Arby's sells roast beef.
Q  Right.  Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q  What is the expression trying to convey?
A  It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q  Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A  Yeah.
Q  She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there?  You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous.  I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants.  Yes.
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q  You're not making a slur about her?
A  No.
Q  You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A  Yes.  That's correct.  That's correct.
Q  Why are you laughing?
A  Because I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I just think it's so funny.  I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q  What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
view more: next ›