mkwt

joined 2 years ago
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not even. ed is The Standard Editor.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this department has sent our best and brightest officers to Harvard, hoping the university would better understand and appreciate our warrior class,

That's, uh, not why DoD occasionally sends officers to Harvard and other elite universities. DoD does this because they want some of their officers to have high quality advanced degrees.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

I've heard that Trump was too scared to say the line to people's face, so he pre-recorded it.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Also, the man is not his son.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Update: the government fired the attorney the next day, so she can at least get some sleep.

(The judge declined to grant her request for contempt.)

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

By using quantum sensor-driven magnetic navigation

So, like a compass? "Quantum" probably means they're using a (pretty new) solid state optical sensing mechanism. Remember, everything is "quantum" inside a silicon wafer.

Meanwhile, MEMS magnetometers have been standard in commercial AHRS equipment for quite a while, and it's pretty standard to integrate the data into a navigational solution with other sensors.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago (4 children)

As far as I can tell, this man is guilty of allowing people to use his bathroom if they ask nicely.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 45 points 5 days ago (7 children)

I'm starting to believe that the pizza gate stuff, QAnon, and the "trans are groomers" rhetoric were all planted in public just to muddy the waters around Epstein; to confuse people. That seems exactly what happened to this person.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

She could say what exactly the feds are doing wrong, for example, with federal officers' names and dates and details. Create the record.

My guess is that the ICE and DHS people who are breaking the law have figured out not to tell the attorneys this stuff, for precisely this reason. The attorneys have a duty of candor to the court, but ICE does not.

She could refuse to file motions supporting the feds.

She may already be doing this, at least with respect to 100% dilatory motions. I haven't kept up with her case work.

Then the people would win those uncontested cases.

In this case, and in many others like it in MN, the petitioners already won their case. They've been ordered to be released, but they aren't getting released in a timely manner.

When a judge issues a release order, it is the responsibility of the federal attorney to communicate the contents of that order into the federal bureaucracy, to ensure it is carried out. That process has turned into an all-consuming job, because that's how ICE wants it.

I agree in general, though, that the only ethical or moral move here is to resign.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

The long term problem is that lawyers are often not stupid, and they can see that working for this DOJ will have deleterious effects on their future careers when this stuff is over. I've heard that the Minneapolis office is down to 9 attorneys, and should be staffed for 50.

But the immediate problem here dates back to Rumsfeld v. Padilla*. In that case, the supreme court decided that habeas petitions must be filed in the district of actual, physical confinement. This created a race condition, where ICE is trying to get these people out of Minnesota as fast as possible, and these people's lawyers are trying to file the lawsuits in Minnesota before their clients physically leave the state. ICE would prefer for these petitions to be filed in Texas, because the Texas district courts are a lot more favorable to them. The Minnesota lawyers don't want to have to file in Texas, both because it's a disadvantage to them, and because they aren't admitted to practice in Texas, and it's a big hassle to work around that.

Combine that with Trump v. CASA, and no one wants to try a habeas class action. So you have a crap ton of individualized habeas petitions, all over the same issue, which is ICE's incorrect interpretation of federal immigration law. And in many, many of these cases, they properly got filed in Minnesota, but the prisoners got shipped to Texas anyway. The Minnesota judges are figuring out that all these cases are the same, and they're making the decisions real fast now, and ICE is not keeping up, by design. It's a total logistical cluster.

*Yes, it's that Donald Rumsfeld, and that Jose Padilla, the dirty bomb guy.

 

A lawyer working with the Minnesota attorney’s office said she just wants some sleep, after working so hard to try to get ICE to follow court orders.

“I wish you would just hold me in contempt of court so I can get 24 hours of sleep,” Le said. “The system sucks, this job sucks, I am trying with every breath I have to get you what I need.”

Edit clarification: This attorney works for the federal government, not the State of Minnesota.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Boasberg's allegedly inappropriate remarks were delivered in a private breakfast with other judges prior to judicial conference. The point is that it was the kind of judicial conference that's supposed to remain private. So much so, that the DOJ refused to provide the court with their copy of Boasberg's actual words, because then they would have to explain how they got hold of them (probably illegally).

So that gave the court an easy reason to dismiss the complaint.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

“It’s a bit scary to know that the most valuable private company in the world has your address and has shown up and has questions for you,”

That's how "service of process" works. "Process server" is an entire career for people who figure out how to deliver legal documents to people personally.

 

Over the weekend, Judge Nachmanoff made it clear that a large amount of discovery material is to be delivered to James Comey today. The prosecution team from North Carolina seem to be engaging in a series of stall tactics to delay this.

The eastern district of Virginia is known informally as the "rocket docket" because of its fast resolution times for cases.

 

While sitting for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit that she filed, Laura Loomer was asked to explain under oath what she meant by the phrase "Arby's in her pants" (which she earlier penned in a tweet).

Transcript:

Q  Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, Arby's --
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A  Arby's sells roast beef.
Q  Right.  Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q  What is the expression trying to convey?
A  It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q  Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A  Yeah.
Q  She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there?  You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous.  I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants.  Yes.
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q  You're not making a slur about her?
A  No.
Q  You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A  Yes.  That's correct.  That's correct.
Q  Why are you laughing?
A  Because I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I just think it's so funny.  I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q  What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
view more: next ›