632
submitted 3 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Conservative-dominated court restores books denounced by officials as ‘pornographic filth’ to school libraries

An appellate court has ruled that Texas cannot ban books from libraries simply because they mention “butt and fart” and other content which some state officials may dislike.

The fifth US circuit court of appeals issued its decision on Thursday in a 76-page majority opinion, which was written by Judge Jacques Wiener Jr and opened with a quote from American poet Walt Whitman: “The dirtiest book in all the world is the expurgated book.”

In its decision, the appellate court declared that “government actors may not remove books from a public library with the intent to deprive patrons of access to ideas with which they disagree”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 134 points 3 weeks ago

And these old farts are complaining about how “soft” today’s youth are? They really need to get their heads out of their butts.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

And also tout freedom of speech.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

They gonna come for your post next.

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 7 points 2 weeks ago

And when bullshit like this gets passed and they get in trouble, they automatically assume it's the left lol

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 79 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Imagine having to write 76 pages in response to this bullshit

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 48 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

To be fair, he didn't have to make it that long.

On the other hand, we wouldn't have gotten this:

• Seven “butt and fart” books, with titles like I Broke My Butt! and Larry the Farting Leprechaun;

[-] subignition@fedia.io 24 points 2 weeks ago

for extra effect, I recommend reading through the opinion first before imagining. The high quality of the writing really accentuates the ludicrous degree of clown shit on display from the GOP.

[-] Vorticity@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

The primary opinion is only 27 pages. The rest is a three page concurrence a 46 page dissent by Duncan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Vorticity@lemmy.world 66 points 2 weeks ago

I think it says something that one of the books they were trying to ban was Called Themselves the K.K.K: The Birth of an American Terrorist Group by Susan Campbell Bartoletti.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago

If you look at the books that were banned and take out all the humorous ones about butts and farts, you're left almost exclusively with books about past conservative atrocities and books about current targets of conservative bigotry.

The people who want to ban these books were too bigoted for the 5th Circuit. They'll probably try to close the whole library next.

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 54 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The Bible describes God showing Moses his 'backside', which a number of actual scholars interpret as including his butt.

Not sure about farts in the Bible, but there's stories about rape, incest, at one point a description of men with 'emission like donkeys', ie, huge cum loads from big dicks.

They seem to never learn that if you try to ban 'pornographic' text, you'll have to ban the Bible as well.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Nuh uh. I swored on the bi-bull three times. That ain’t in there. I never heard my preacher say that and all he ever talked about was the bi-bull.

[-] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

That’s one angle though isn’t it, so then they can claim religious persecution?

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 48 points 2 weeks ago

From the "fuck your feelings" crowd lol

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

No, no, no! You got it all wrong. It’s the kiiiiiiiids.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Kids fucking live for fart and butt jokes. I've never seen a group of children giggle harder than when I watched a teacher read "I Need a New Butt."

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

My older kids went through a phase where they were just randomly saying “butt” for like a year. By the end of it I couldn’t stand my own ass.

“Hey dad, dad, DAD!”

“What is it kiddo?”

“Butts! Ahahahahaha. Just picture it, crack down the middle, poopin’, just hanging out being a butt.”

When I realized I hadn’t heard the word “butt” for a few months, my sigh of relief could have changed the orbit of the planet.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Aganim@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine being all worked up about books mentioning raging obscenities like 'butt' and 'fart', only to get slapped in the face by Judge 'Wiener'. 😂

[-] HUMAN_TRASH@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Theyre trying to ban him next

[-] JonEFive@midwest.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine having that much of an issue with barely offensive words that their kids will never read because most don't use the school library anyway.

And imagine letting your kids come home and access whatever media they want including actual pornography on the internet. Most of these parents have zero clue how to block internet sites on their home computers and laptops let alone the phones that their kids all have.

But of course, that's another problem some parents are asking the government to solve by forcing porn sites to require visitors to affirmatively identify themselves and their age. Of course, that only applies to the major porn sites that play by the arbitrary rules anyway. All so stupid.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 44 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

which was written by Judge Jacques Wiener Jr

Heh heh

[-] benignintervention@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Poetry in motion

[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago

Get fucked fascists. Exactly never are the ones banning/burning books on the right side of history.

[-] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 3 weeks ago

Take that you butt-hurt fart knockers.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

The desenting opinion called the court the "library police" for refusing to let the state police the library.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

All they know is projection

[-] Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com 27 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine being that offended by Captain Underpants

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

These are the same people who tried to get Mr Rogers taken off the air and tried to shut down PBS entirely.

I think the average city-American doesn't fully appreciate how backwards most of our country really is. As someone who grew up in the rural outskirts I can tell stories of the people and communities and attitudes that would probably be shocking to many people, but there are so many people like this that they have significant power over our land. We have to be a lot better about enforcing education in our country, we need to bring the morons back up out of the dark-ages, because there are a fucking LOT of dark-age imbeciles across the US shaping policy for all of us and most of the time they run unchallenged because everyone just fixates on presidential elections every four years and nothing else.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PoopDelivery@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 weeks ago

Good. Fuck Butt Fart Texas. Books should not be censored for words. I remember a teacher in maybe 7th grade reading a book outloud with the word fuck in it, and he just said it and kept reading, he.knew the book well. I gained a lot of respect for that teacher and listened to him because I felt like he wasn't going to censor what he taught us.

[-] JonEFive@midwest.social 8 points 2 weeks ago

Good teacher. Authors choose their words intentionally. I'm guessing "fudging", "friggen", and "ducking" (thanks iPhone) are not great replacements for the subject matter.

[-] Silverseren@fedia.io 20 points 2 weeks ago

Apparently terms that anyone over 12 years old doesn't find funny anymore count as "adult".

Is this conservatives admitting that they are all just immature children?

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago

And in 5 years they’ll all be wearing “Make Butt Fart Again” hats.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I haven't farted in like twenty years. You have no idea how much you start to miss it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 19 points 2 weeks ago

Republicans are NOT Snowflakes!

[-] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately, we know how this is going to go: "If you won't let us ban books from the library, we'll just ban the library."

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

Already happening in some places. Local governments are cutting library funding because they don't like the some of the content that their libraries are stocking, but the courts won't let them ban it all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Btw, I absolutely ADORE that the acronym for the system used by libraries to weed out old books is MUSTIE 😆❤️

[-] d00ery@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What does MUSTIE stand for? You can't just leave us hanging! 🤓

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Llano County applies the “MUSTIE” factors in weeding books, as recommended by experts in the field, under which a book is evaluated for whether it is (1) “Misleading and/or factually inaccurate,” (2) “Ugly (worn out beyond mending or rebinding),” (3) “Superseded by a new edition or a better source,” (4) “Trivial (of no discernable literary or scientific merit),” (5) “Irrelevant to the needs and interests of the community,” or (6) “Elsewhere (the material may be easily borrowed from another source).”

[-] Norgur@fedia.io 14 points 3 weeks ago

Anyone else thinking that this Judge would have gotten his autobiography banned for profanity just for the name?

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago

what, trying to equate "butt" and "fart" with porn didn't work?

-moron GOP who think everyone is as dumb as they are

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Every child between the ages of 2 and 10 would find a book with nothing but the words 'butt' and 'fart' endlessly amusing.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

Awesome. Time to check out "The Poop That Took a Pee."

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Butts make funny noises when you pass gas. Babies laugh at it. They have no idea what’s going on at all 95% of the time, but they get that farts are funny.

[-] jwt@programming.dev 6 points 2 weeks ago

Reminds me of Stephen Colbert and Hugh Laurie pointing out the sheer ridiculousness of censoring words:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x12t3st

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Didn't Trump fart all the time while in court? I'd expect them to love farts and huff them all the time. Their lord and savior deemed it good enough for his behind, so it shall be good enough for their noses. It was his political statement, banning farts from books is political motivated terrorism or something like that, I don't know. I'm not insane enough to understand their intentions.

[-] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Not even close to the most ridiculous things in books Texas had tried to ban.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I swear Captain Underpants already negated this like a decade ago lol

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
632 points (99.1% liked)

News

21678 readers
3282 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS