[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Addiction isn’t simply “deciding to stop” dude. Congrats you were one of the exceptions but have a little empathy here. This is bootstraps nonsense.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 hours ago

His supporters wear the damn shirts

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago

Sure but the biggest pushback I’ve really seen tbh was by a dude who eventually revealed he’s just ranting about cancel culture. He doesn’t even like Grohl. So certainly not a liberal lol

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Ahhhh this all makes sense now. You are on a crusade about cancel culture. You want to cancel cancel culture and this is just a proxy battle where you have avoided for several comments actually stating your purpose, but now you are so angry that you can’t resist blurting it out. We could’ve saved a lot of time here but that’s fine. I’m guessing the opacity was on purpose.

This was informative, I’m actually done now. Maybe lay off the CAPSLOCK next time. Later dude.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 8 hours ago

That’s actually lower than I thought it’d be. I sort of assumed it hovered in the 3-4% range. No clue why I did though lol

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 12 hours ago

It’s more of a trans mission

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

A lot of it is clearly age dependent and about what they did. My kids are very, very young. What the repeat doesn’t yet reflect what they believe. One is barely 2 so they are truly still a parrot lol so reacting big just often confuses them. As they get older no doubt I’ll drop the hammer if I hear something heinous.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 12 hours ago

Makes sense. Appreciate the elaboration!

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 12 hours ago

Thanks for asking! It’s actually something I like discussing. It helps me organize my thoughts a bit

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

it doesn’t mean “giving the target population special privileges in unrelated fields to make up for it”

Your language overall makes me think you’re fine but I’d be lying if I didn’t say this particular part didn’t catch my attention. Is there a reason you felt the need to say this? In the context of affirmative action being repealed in the US it feels a tad loaded. Giving the benefit of the doubt here truly, but still curious why you felt the need to say this.

57
Benderule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
545
Boomer Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
view more: next ›

bolexforsoup

joined 1 month ago