830
submitted 2 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 107 points 2 months ago

I would have been eligible for so many refunds in the past if this rule had been in place earlier 🥲

[-] comador@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I can't count the number of times l have had to wait 30 effing days to get my refund for a cancelled work flight that I paid for and couldn't get reimbursed for. Sometimes I needed it for bills, it sucked.

Welcome change indeed.

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Sounds like your employer sucks ass.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Same, fucking delta offered my us $90 refund per ticket for a $400 flight that was cancelled....and then wanted us to rebook it for the next week...i just wanted my damn money back.

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 69 points 2 months ago

The complete rules are here: https://www.transportation.gov/airconsumer/refundsfinalruleapril2024

The meat of it is the table on pages 9-14 and mostly comprehensible.

Worth noting:

  • A change to your flight number is always a "cancellation" and you may choose to accept a refund
    • The expectation is most people would not, for the same reason most don't cancel their refundable tickets - they want to go on the flight
  • There are no carve outs for weather, etc.
    • I am really glad to see this because airlines could claim "weather" for connecting flights, so any weather anywhere meant they could delay your flight
[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the weather note is huge. Historically, airlines would just cite “weather” because there was a single cloud in the sky halfway to the destination. Because if a cancellation was weather related, they didn’t have to pay out.

I basically see this as the government going “look, we tried to be nice and give you some leeway. But you abused that by citing weather for every single cancellation. So now you’re on a tight leash and can’t even cite it when it’s valid.”

[-] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Oh man this is that high fucking quality type of discussion I’m here for, direct link, exact quote , clearly separated but very based opinion

Have an upvote king

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Yes but other side of that coin:

This might cause airlines to push pilots to fly anyway when the weather is outright dangerous to fly. I'm waiting for the first news article about an airplane that took off straight into a thunderstorm, got caught in a down draft and crashed, killing everyone.

Don't underestimate the inventive ways companies can cheat to save money

[-] comrade19@lemmy.world 67 points 2 months ago

They'll just put their prices up to cover this wont they?

[-] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 128 points 2 months ago

They were going to do that anyways.

[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago
[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago
[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago
[-] Steve@communick.news 59 points 2 months ago

Yes. It's still the right thing to do.
Cheaper nonrefundable tickets should be banned also.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 13 points 2 months ago

Prices raised to match the service they should have been providing is reasonable. Cheap tickets were being subsidized by not giving refunds...

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Prices raised across the board by a dollar or something? Good insurance policy for “refundable” fares.

(Obviously not in the “cancel for any reason” sense, that’s wayyy more.)

[-] ruckblack@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 months ago

How about a discount for crossing their fingers and loading us up on a Boeing?

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago

If it's Boeing, I ain't goin'!

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 2 months ago

My problem is not the cash back for my ticket, it's everything I lose when I rebook last second afterwards.

[-] JCreazy@midwest.social 38 points 2 months ago

I rarely fly but last time I did, it was the most chaotic mess I've ever seen. None of the airline employees knew what was going on when they canceled my layover flight 5 minutes before boarding. The way it was handled was a joke and downright insulting.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 months ago

Please name and shame the airline.

[-] JCreazy@midwest.social 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It was American Airlines but I'm not sure any other airline is better. I rarely fly but I was not impressed with the "oh well, shit happens" attitude they had. They did get me on another flight a few hours later. No apology, no compensation, not even a fuck you. I was still in the customer service line of 600+ people after a few hours because 3 flights were canceled at the same time. While in line I got a text message saying my flight was rebooked and leaving in 15 minutes in a completely different terminal so I got out of line and ran to catch the flight.

[-] Prox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

My experience with American Airlines was basically the same. Happened to me back in checks notes last weekend.

Fuck American Airlines in particular. They gave zero shits about getting us back home, zero shits about offering a place to sleep for the night, and zero shits about refunding our tickets. Absolute garbage airline.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I've only had this experience flying American, and I've had it in some way shape or form every time I've flown American.

I now only fly Alaskan. I had an issue one time. I was immediately given miles, a full travel credit, and an upgrade on the flight I was moved to. Also, no hidden bullshit.

[-] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

I fly fairly often, and I feel the opposite. Airports are chaotic hell, yes, but there's always someone who knows what's going on. Usually the check-in desk is the place to ask. I mostly fly Korean Air and Air Canada, though.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago

Good. So that abolishes the stupid insurance upsell bullshit.

[-] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

No, that doesn't end until idiots stop agreeing to it when offered....which won't happen any time soon.

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

But 168 of my fellow passengers have protected their flights today!

[-] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Feels like the flight industry hasn't recovered since COVID. This is a welcome change however

[-] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

They haven't lowered prices, that's for sure.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Very interesting that it didn't in the US, because it did in the EU.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 months ago

It probably would have been worth specifying this is for the USA, since not everyone lives in the USA.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

They’ll just pass the savings on to you.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Even if demand was perfectly inelastic and the burden was paid entirely by the consumer... I'd still rather get what I paid for than leave it up to chance.

[-] You999@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

Does this rule set apply towards diversions? Because under the current rule set an airline can divert a plane to an airport several hours away from your intended destination and they only have to give you a connection at some point in time.

[-] Ranvier@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Yes it would apply:

Canceled or significantly changed flights: Passengers will be entitled to a refund if their flight is canceled or significantly changed, and they do not accept alternative transportation or travel credits offered. For the first time, the rule defines “significant change.” Significant changes to a flight include departure or arrival times that are more than 3 hours domestically and 6 hours internationally; departures or arrivals from a different airport; increases in the number of connections; instances where passengers are downgraded to a lower class of service; or connections at different airports or flights on different planes that are less accessible or accommodating to a person with a disability.

https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/biden-harris-administration-announces-final-rule-requiring-automatic-refunds-airline

[-] You999@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

That's amazing to hear! I've personally have been left stranded by American when they diverted our flight to a regional airport that was six hours and two mountain passes away from our intended destination due to a blizzard and we were only offered a flight that took off three days later. We weren't offered any hotel or food vouchers and when I tried to get a refund American only offered $50 in miles because "some service was provided"...

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That seems like it would fall under the delayed category.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
830 points (99.4% liked)

News

21678 readers
3016 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS