NarrativeBear

joined 2 years ago
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 45 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

We have been surround by cars for so long we have forgotten how amazing pedestrianized streets are.

So much so we fight tooth and nail to keep the cars, but once the street is transformed to something like above we absolutely love it and can't see life any other way.

Not to mention pedestrianized streets like these do so much better economically.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

But did you factor in all the other things like insurance, oil changes, car washes, property tax for owning a driveway and public street maintenance?

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

1000 seems like a lot, but you need to factor in insurance, cost of parking, repurchasing fule, windshield washer fluids, oils, cabin air filters, car washes, heated seat subscriptions. It all adds up quickly.

And I know I must be missing stuff in this list as well like maintenance and depreciation of the vehicle as well.

Also parking costs are generally subsidized with city taxes for on street parking, but owning a condo or home with a driveway you could be looking at property tax attached to your home, and in a condo you may need to purchase the parking spot as a separate property.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

By all means advocating for walkable cities does not mean everyone needs to live in a walkable city. And it definitely does not mean you personally need to ditch your car if you absolutely still have need of it.

You personally could still choose to drive in from a rural house located a hour or two out of a dense suburban neighborhood like this if you so choose each morning. But don't deny everyone else that wants to walk down the stairs from their four-plex or small rise condo to grab milk and bread right at the lower level along their neighborhood street.

Also don't forget we all get older and when we do we will start to loose our ability to drive. Density like this is desperately needed it allows both older folks and children to get around more independently with schools, shops, cafés and pharmacies all within a short walk or quick tram or subway ride.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Why not just have one or two coach buses? Would probably care the same amount of people.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Wish more cities would use these types of markings, they usually mean red/yellow being no parking and blue being accessible parking. In some European cities they use zigzag markings meaning no parking.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Using this logic we should have bollards at all pedestrian crossings/intersections.

Its strange how a person on a bike highlights how unsafe streets and roads are because of cars

Also, these bollars that you are referring to here are actually only called curb markers. These are to show cars or snow plows where the curb is in low visibility. They are very similar to the marlers you may see for center curbs like these.

1000055126

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I see bike banana's and I upvote!

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Infrastructure not weather makes bicycling great.

Similarly having great trails and sidewalks makes walking great, not the weather.

People have been walking in the rain and snow for millennia.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Its a step in the right direction, and you would not build a 10 lane highway right away, lanes would be added on and expanded as time progress.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This really just comes down to choosing where you live and at the same time writing your MP once in a while requesting better funding for good permanent infrastructure.

This could include asking for larger wider sidewalks, dedicated bicycle infrastructure like multi use trails, bikepaths and bikelanes, or asking for the city to allow more medium density into neighborhoods so that transit becomes more visible in the long run. You can even advocate for the addition of local shops to be able to open in residential neighborhoods.

Living in a "modern" American style suburb generally means the need of a car as shops and pharmacies are generally "outside" of the suburb. Walking in these places also generally is restricted to along the same street you need to drive down with no "short cuts" or trails in between homes. So walking 30min vs a 5min drive generally the car will wins out.

There are places in North America that are more walkable then others, look for more dense neighborhoods with no driveways and local shops right within the neighborhoods. I would also recommend looking at the youtube channel "NotJustBikes" this can give you ideas in some of the stuff you can start looking at from a infrastructure standpoint to show you well designed places for people and not just cars.

And I'd not forget making places that look like this is possible, it just requires a shift in perspective to see one is "car centric"

1000054667

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

A group of students emptied blue ink from pens onto the stair handrails for a graduation prank.

It ended with paramedics being called to the highschool with police and news crews. Staff and students started to think it was a biological threat of sorts, as multiple random students started to get blue hands and eyes.

Same school a different year a bunch of students got on the roof and spray painted all the skylights black.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42690419

Mississauga Mayor Carolyn Parrish has sent another letter to the province urging that the transfer of regional roads from Peel Region to the city remain on schedule.

In her Jan. 28 letter to Ontario’s Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Rob Flack, Parrish called for the July 1, 2026, transfer date to be maintained, rather than postponed to newly proposed July 1, 2027.

She also highlighted the financial impact on Mississauga taxpayers, noting the city has been subsidizing Caledon’s regional roads for decades.

Parrish estimated Mississauga spends about $25 million to $30 million annually to subsidize Caledon’s regional roads.

“For 50 years it has been a significant burden borne mostly by Mississauga property taxpayers. The current arrangement is patently unfair,” she wrote.

The letter comes after reports that Caledon Mayor Annette Groves supports delaying the transfer to 2027, citing the town’s limited financial capacity to maintain the roads, which she estimates would cost between $35 million and $40 million per year. Parrish said she agrees the costs are significant, but questioned why Caledon is raising concerns only now.

Parrish asked the province to provide funding to offset Caledon’s costs and to remove the long-standing financial burden on Mississauga property taxpayers. She also requested access to reports prepared by the Peel Transition Board on regional road transfers.

 

Mississauga Mayor Carolyn Parrish has sent another letter to the province urging that the transfer of regional roads from Peel Region to the city remain on schedule.

In her Jan. 28 letter to Ontario’s Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Rob Flack, Parrish called for the July 1, 2026, transfer date to be maintained, rather than postponed to newly proposed July 1, 2027.

She also highlighted the financial impact on Mississauga taxpayers, noting the city has been subsidizing Caledon’s regional roads for decades.

Parrish estimated Mississauga spends about $25 million to $30 million annually to subsidize Caledon’s regional roads.

“For 50 years it has been a significant burden borne mostly by Mississauga property taxpayers. The current arrangement is patently unfair,” she wrote.

The letter comes after reports that Caledon Mayor Annette Groves supports delaying the transfer to 2027, citing the town’s limited financial capacity to maintain the roads, which she estimates would cost between $35 million and $40 million per year. Parrish said she agrees the costs are significant, but questioned why Caledon is raising concerns only now.

Parrish asked the province to provide funding to offset Caledon’s costs and to remove the long-standing financial burden on Mississauga property taxpayers. She also requested access to reports prepared by the Peel Transition Board on regional road transfers.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42588196

Red-light cameras in Ontario have been catching civilians for years, but some police officers who rush to emergencies say they’re unfairly being penalized by the same technology.

Under Ontario's Highway Traffic Act, police are allowed to go through a red light, with lights and sirens activated, after coming to a stop and when it’s safe to do so.

There have been instances in other parts of Canada when first responders were found to be responsible for causing a crash while going through a red light.

For instance, in 2024, a Winnipeg police officer pleaded guilty after causing a two-vehicle crash at an intersection when responding to an emergency.

Rice said there are forms of accountability that officers face when that happens — including internal reviews, and scrutiny by Ontario’s Special Investigations Unit and the Law Enforcement Complaints Agency.

“That’s the goal of it. The officer has to come up [to the intersection] — they use discretion and judgment,” said Rice.

 

Red-light cameras in Ontario have been catching civilians for years, but some police officers who rush to emergencies say they’re unfairly being penalized by the same technology.

Under Ontario's Highway Traffic Act, police are allowed to go through a red light, with lights and sirens activated, after coming to a stop and when it’s safe to do so.

There have been instances in other parts of Canada when first responders were found to be responsible for causing a crash while going through a red light.

For instance, in 2024, a Winnipeg police officer pleaded guilty after causing a two-vehicle crash at an intersection when responding to an emergency.

Rice said there are forms of accountability that officers face when that happens — including internal reviews, and scrutiny by Ontario’s Special Investigations Unit and the Law Enforcement Complaints Agency.

“That’s the goal of it. The officer has to come up [to the intersection] — they use discretion and judgment,” said Rice.

 

It’s been a few years since the former Toronto Coach Terminal closed to travellers, but municipal officials have unveiled a massive redevelopment plan that will see hundreds of new apartments and other uses on the 1.3-acre site.

Located west of Bay Street and east of Chestnut Street just north of Dundas Street West, the former bus transportation hub will be home to two new purpose-built apartment rental towers.

They said the first tower at 610 Bay St. is expected to be finished in early 2029 while the larger building at 130 Elizabeth St. is set to finish in early 2030. During a news conference, a representative said they hope construction will start in late 2025.

The former Toronto Coach Terminal opened in 1931 and had art deco styling. Gray Coach Lines, Toronto Greyhound Lines and Colonial Coach Lines were among the earlier users of the facility. Eventually, GO Transit and other bus companies still operating today moved into the facility.

However, GO Transit began moving out in the 1990s and early 2000s in favour of servicing Union Station (first through roadside boarding and then through the eventual Union Station Bus Terminal). The remaining bus companies eventually joined GO Transit. The facility closed in mid-2021 as it started falling into disrepair.

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42301946

Howard Park Avenue residents say being designated a snow route leaves them with no legal place to park during snowstorms, forcing them to risk fines or park far from home.

“If we park on our street, it’s a $100 ticket, and if you park nearby, we also get a ticket, like $45,” Silva said to Now Toronto. “No matter where we park, we get a ticket.”

In recent weeks, Toronto has been hit by two snowstorms. Sunday’s storm brought a historic 60 centimetres of snow to the region in one day. Silva says residents have already received parking tickets as a result of these events.

As a result, Silva says he now parks his car at a friend’s home downtown and then takes an Uber or the TTC back to his home.

“See how much time I’m wasting in the day? And how much extra money I’m [spending], I cannot afford this anymore,” he said.

Silva, who already received a ticket in February of last year, says the situation has taken a toll on him.

“I cannot concentrate on my work anymore, because when I leave my work, I have to think, ‘Oh, where am I gonna leave my car?,’” he said.

 

Howard Park Avenue residents say being designated a snow route leaves them with no legal place to park during snowstorms, forcing them to risk fines or park far from home.

“If we park on our street, it’s a $100 ticket, and if you park nearby, we also get a ticket, like $45,” Silva said to Now Toronto. “No matter where we park, we get a ticket.”

In recent weeks, Toronto has been hit by two snowstorms. Sunday’s storm brought a historic 60 centimetres of snow to the region in one day. Silva says residents have already received parking tickets as a result of these events.

As a result, Silva says he now parks his car at a friend’s home downtown and then takes an Uber or the TTC back to his home.

“See how much time I’m wasting in the day? And how much extra money I’m [spending], I cannot afford this anymore,” he said.

Silva, who already received a ticket in February of last year, says the situation has taken a toll on him.

“I cannot concentrate on my work anymore, because when I leave my work, I have to think, ‘Oh, where am I gonna leave my car?,’” he said.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/41684285

As a major snowstorm caused travel chaos, serious weather alerts, highway closures and school cancellations, some working for Ontario’s Ministry of Transportation were told to head into the office.

“Just a reminder that we have a 5-day a week in person requirement,” the email, seen by Global News, said.

It added that the snow meant staff could arrive late and leave early as long as they made an effort to attend.

“Otherwise,” the note concluded, “please take a vacation day, which some … staff are doing today.”

The message was sent after schools in Toronto had announced they would close for the day, and while emergency services and Environment Canada were urging people to avoid all non-essential travel.

“Allow extra time for travel,” the weather agency wrote. “Non-essential travel should be avoided.”

About an hour after telling workers to head into the office or use a vacation day, the directive was revised.

“We are now being advised that if you have your equipment, you may work from home,” the follow-up, sent at 10:35 a.m., said. “Staff to decide for themselves if it’s safe or possible to drive in today. Please use your best judgment and prioritize safety.”

 

As a major snowstorm caused travel chaos, serious weather alerts, highway closures and school cancellations, some working for Ontario’s Ministry of Transportation were told to head into the office.

“Just a reminder that we have a 5-day a week in person requirement,” the email, seen by Global News, said.

It added that the snow meant staff could arrive late and leave early as long as they made an effort to attend.

“Otherwise,” the note concluded, “please take a vacation day, which some … staff are doing today.”

The message was sent after schools in Toronto had announced they would close for the day, and while emergency services and Environment Canada were urging people to avoid all non-essential travel.

“Allow extra time for travel,” the weather agency wrote. “Non-essential travel should be avoided.”

About an hour after telling workers to head into the office or use a vacation day, the directive was revised.

“We are now being advised that if you have your equipment, you may work from home,” the follow-up, sent at 10:35 a.m., said. “Staff to decide for themselves if it’s safe or possible to drive in today. Please use your best judgment and prioritize safety.”

 

The Trump administration ordered an aging coal-fired power plant in Colorado to stay open on Tuesday, a day before it was set to be retired.

The order from Energy Secretary Chris Wright will keep the nearly 50-year-old Craig Generating Station Unit 1 in northwest Colorado operating until the end of March, with an option to extend it further.

It’s the Department of Energy’s sixth such move this year; Wright has also ordered two coal plants in Indiana, one in Michigan and one in Washington state to stay open past their retirement dates, as well as a Pennsylvania power plant that runs on oil.

“Keeping this coal plant online will ensure Americans maintain an affordable, reliable, and secure supply of electricity,” Wright said in a statement.

 
view more: next ›