this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
306 points (96.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38199 readers
5868 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 9 hours ago

You own a reciept that points to where the monkey is currently. And there's no gurantee the monkey will be there the next time you wanna look at it.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 58 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Still false, you own the token representing the monkey but not the monkey itself

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 33 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

The correct understanding of NFTs has always been trivial: they're certificates. What they certify is not determined.

Anyone telling you anything else is either lying, or a moron (or has been lied to, which is not incompatible with being a moron).

[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago

The type of use case I see it could be good for is Software ownership. One could sell his copy of a game or give it to someone else by exchanging the token and the software could use it to validate ownership.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't it basically just a receipt?

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 6 points 10 hours ago

It's more general than that; a receipt is like a certificate that certifies that you bought something, but an NFT could certify something else.

Provenance is a major issue in art. NFTs provide the best provenance yet.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Yuppp

The anti-NFT crowd won with lies, helped by the loudest pro-NFT voices also being absolute morons and focusing on the dumbest possible ways to actually implement it.

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Let it go man, the NFTs aren't coming back.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

Good ideas never die ;)

To be clear I didn't get into "NFTs" during the craze at all because I knew what NFTs are supposed to be and personalized pictures of monkeys is not it.

At the same time it was hilarious how stupid the arguments on both sides were.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 0 points 7 hours ago

You sound like someone who thinks an nft is something other than a certificate.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's a bitcoin that can't be swapped for other bitcoins, right?

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 13 hours ago

Yes that's also true... I would venture that it's not as useful in general to understand the concept though :)

[–] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Replace "token" with "title" and "monkey" with "car," and you've got a formula most people understand.

I own the title, but I don't own the car.

Unlike the monkey, you can go find the car in the real world.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago

A closer analogy is Copyright Registration. You submit a work to the copyright office, claiming to be the original artist. If there is ever a dispute, the submission serves as evidence as to the date and time you claimed the work. If it predates the claims of another, and they can't prove you transferred the work to them, you win the case.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

But eventually you own the car. You never own the monkey.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Plus you can trust that no one else has your car, whereas you have no way of knowing how may times your monkey was copied or how may exist outside the scope of your β€œcertificate”

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"You wouldn't download a car..."

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

That’s the worst part, where the reality is the opposite.

  • my car has value because it exists as a physical thing that is useful to me. If I could download a car, it doesn’t take away from anyone, just adds value for me
  • the monkey could only have value in exclusivity. It is not a material possession nor is it useful to me, but can only have value if I can prevent anyone else from having it. If I could download someone else’s monkey, then they lose any value they think it had
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Its not about whether you actually own the thing or not, its the record of you owning it.

Without a central body enforcing it its basically pointless, similar to if you don't own the title of the car you don't actually have record of ownership and therefore don't have the rights to go along with that legally. (In theory lol)

The potential advantage of it being on an immutable blockchain means there's a permanent record that isn't tied to a piece of paper, and the distributed nature of most blockchains ensure there isn't a single point of failure. (In theory again)

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If you don't have the title to your car, and no one else does either, you can prove ownership by possession. Same with NFT, you prove ownership because you possess the wallet credentials.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

So what if someone steals your car, what then?

Edit agree on the NFT point, that is the whole idea right lol

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 16 hours ago

Nooo bro, I totally OWN that jay-peg bro, you can look it up bro, the token is non fungible bro, do you even know what that means, bro?

[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

I wonder about the source of this image. She looks horribly uncomfortable...

[–] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 38 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

Lol from that page

[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 17 hours ago

Thanks!

But, wait... The guy in the OG Bro Explaining me is not Adam Sandler?!

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 10 hours ago

It could have also just been unfortunate timing.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 29 points 17 hours ago

This is why I like the other one because the bro being explained to just looks like his soul is dying.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It looks set up unlike the original.

[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 14 hours ago

Turns out it is set-up, actually.