Oh, yeah. I can't imagine how difficult it'd be to route resources without an intermediary object to barter.
surewhynotlem
Ok cool. Do guy comes into society. No job. Gets job. Doesn't pay taxes?
So you CAN have a society without rules for entry?
I could see this working in a world where people were sensible. I'd certainly support giving back some portion of the country and saying "ok you're your own country now, have at it".
Where people will fight to the death is: which parts and how much land.
But this at least is could be the framework for a reasonable option.
Nope. That's actually my point. Can't have a society without rules for entry.
So "no one is illegal on stolen land" is saying "you stole the land and built a society, and that society can't have the rules necessary to exist."
It poses no next step and no real solution to the problem. It feels nice and gets us nowhere.
I'm gonna need a Bradley's on one end and a Woolworths on the other.
It's in favor of the thing that's killing the environment, putting people out of work, funneling money to the billionaires, inflating the stock market, and doing all of that recklessly.
Like basically everything else the right does.
Sure, but borderless doesn't mean lawless. I'm a world with no borders you'd have no immigration. But you'd still have laws applied when people are born, which is effectively the same thing. Giving them an ID. Making sure they're getting their education and vaccines. Etc.
And if you somehow avoided doing those things, that's breaking the law and you'd be illegally outside the system.