this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
1050 points (97.1% liked)

Science Memes

20690 readers
2009 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 60 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is useful for those trying to convey more precisely the amount of fucks they give.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's mainly limited to the American South.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You’re thinking of the fucks relatives, or also known in scientific circles as The Alabamian Constant (TAC for short).

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is the speed of fucks thus constant?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kirkoman@sh.itjust.works 31 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Nice try but no proof yet if the fuckery field is irrational.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh, there's definitely irrational fucks. I don't see a proof that there's indeed a fuckomorphism between C and F, though.

[–] ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nah, just look at the folks over in HR. Irrational fucks to a person. Though I suppose all that means is that there are some irrational elements in the set, not necessarily that it's isomorphic to the field of complex numbers. So can we diagonalize fuckery somehow...?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] don@lemmy.ca 25 points 11 months ago (3 children)

So what’s their opinion on the holy fuck?

[–] radix@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Must be an angel with wings, so they can also have a flying fuck.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The holy trinity.

Fucking God Damn, Jesus Fucking Christ and Holy Fuck.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

No idea, but I do see plenty of evil fucks every day on the news.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There are definitely positive and negative fucks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 22 points 11 months ago

This does not even scratch the surface of the possible uses and variations of fuck.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 21 points 11 months ago

∅ = how many i have left to give.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

What in the fucking fuck?! is a good one, too. Has some real what in tarnation? energy to it.

I also learned that FUCKING GOD!! is my go-to expletive when I spilled some icecream and my daughter (3 at the time) started yelling it in the car.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

'What in the fucking fuck' implies that fucking is an injective function over the field of fucks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Would plain old "What the Fuck" imply a null set?

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Which implies the existence of a non god affected fucks.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Given the overwhelming prevalence of holy fucks relative to damned fucks, does this suggest sanctified beings get laid more?

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Idk, there's so much talk about virgins in heaven, you'd think it's the opposite!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No prove of irrational fucks yet tho

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Plenty of empirical evidence around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Entitle9294@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ok, everyone but me seems to get it, so I'll ask. I get everything but the last bit. What does "isomorphic with the complex field" mean? I think I know what isomorphic means from some dabbling I've done in category theory.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

In means you can map every element bijectively to one from the complex field AND addition and multiplication can be performed in either field without leading to contractions, i.e. a+b=c <=> f(a)+f(b)=f(a+b)=f(c) and equivalent for multiplication. This is the part that the meme fails to consider, because nowhere is addition or multiplication for this novel field defined.

[–] Entitle9294@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'll give this some attention when time permits because this does not make things clearer, lol.

I'll start with what a field is and a complex field 🤞

[–] DisguisedJoker@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

ELI5: it means that for every number there's a matching fuck and vice versa.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago

"i do not give a single fuck" implies an additive identity fuck, and "I don't give two fucks" implies a multiplicative identity fuck. That's a start at least!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago

I fucking love this

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

fan-fucking-tastic

[–] sunoc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

Okay but is the fuck a monoid in the category of endofunctors ?

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Euler's fuck formula.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

The fuck transcends our ability to capture its essence

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

fucking fucks implies fucks are procreating.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

What the fuck

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 11 months ago

I’ve always loved ladies who are smarter / better educated than me.

[–] Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fucks can also have a social hierarchy, as evidenced by the phrase:

"I don't give a single solitary fuck"

[–] save_the_humans@leminal.space 3 points 11 months ago

These are are simply unitary fucks. Matrix fucks with eigenvalue absolute value of 1. Surprisingly useful for quantum computing applications.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What the uncomputable fuck

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

I see this comment section is full of various operations defined on fuckery. I don't think they form a field or even a ringi

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I actually tend to treat fucks like the constant C in calculus. Ideally it should cancel out entirely and you should give the minimal amount of fucks in all of your final answers.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So what's fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck?

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 5 points 11 months ago

About tree fiddy

[–] CucumberFetish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The real question is - is fuck Turing-complete?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

It's actually a beautiful language for arguing about computability because of how similar it is to a theoretical turning machine in that it possesses a read/write head that can move left and right on an infinite band. It's also incredibly simple to simulate using any other language of choice, including assembly and heck, even raw logic gates.

In this essay I will explain why Brainfuck should be the first language taught to computer science majors.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

I prefer to solve the Hodge conjecture

load more comments
view more: next ›