Research suggests a T-Rex would need 50-100k kCal/day. Even if it ate a whole cow before starting, it would be hurting a week in.
Maybe it could survive the month, but would probably be severely malnourished at that point.
In any event, there is no mention of what happens if I fail to kill it. Does the experiment just end and I go home empty handed, or does the magic hut disappear and we fight it out to the death?
It never existed.
If you make two beautiful paintings, and sell one for $1000, then decide to sell the other, but nobody wants it for more than $500, you didn't "lose" the $500 difference.
Maybe you even told people you had another $1000 painting, then only got $500 in cash for it, so your reported net wealth dropped by $500.
At worst, you actually paid $1000, then sold for $500, but even then, the difference didn't disappear, you just transferred it to the original owner by overpaying, or to the new owner by undercharging if the price goes back up.
Time is money.
It's not like expensive convenience has a monopoly. If you don't want to pay more, do it yourself.
He doesn't understand his national security briefings, but he does know what a giraffe looks like, and isn't that what's really important here?
Crimson Skies with modern planes would be quite different than Crimson Skies.
Would Ace Combat scratch that itch? It's quite arcade-y. Or for a more indie take on the same formula, I had a lot of fun with Project Wingman. Neither has the same kind of pulp adventure storyline, but that may be as close as we have right now.
Am I out of touch? No, it's Valve who is wrong.
Production hasn't stopped, it has merely been paused forever.
Going to need a little more info. Is there a particular game you're interested in?
What's the NFL supposed to do, NOT broadcast the Cowboys to every TV in the country regardless of their record or opponent?
Tyrannus tyrannus is too powerful.
Just because a 3060ti is technically capable of ray tracing doesn't mean I want you to keep turning it on every time the driver gets an update.
There are bad faith questions[1], (at least somewhat) self-answering questions[2], and poorly asked questions[3]. (Edit: this comm has rules. These and others are covered in the sidebar, It's not about being too stupid a question, it's about being appropriate for this community)
[1] "Are you still cheating on your spouse?" type questions that are meant to evoke a response rather than ask a real question that deserves an answer.
[2] is a little harder to define, but I have definitely seen a few where even the smallest amount of thought about what is being asked would make the answer obvious. (edit: I hope people aren't just drive-by downvoting this type, but I sort of understand why they might)
[3] includes questions that have so many answers depending on factors not specified that they're impossible to answer without writing a book covering every assumption that goes into each possibility.