The other day someone told me that their partner used ChatGPT instead of going to therapy.
We’re all so cooked.
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
The other day someone told me that their partner used ChatGPT instead of going to therapy.
We’re all so cooked.
So many people are going to develop/exacerbate mental illness from doing that.
Turbo cooked
Probing the quicksand with a rod made of quicksand
Sounds safe to me
The point of contention regarding therapy for me is that I’m literally paying for an impersonal conversation in which I express my deepest insecurities to someone who most likely doesn’t give a shit.
I don’t see how AI fixes that but I also don’t understand why it can’t help if your relationship with your therapist is supposed to be a fundamentally clinical one.
If find that it's helpful being able to talk to someone that you can't disappoint. Otherwise I will always lie to make them feel better about how I'm doing
I’ve had therapists with whom that exact scenario has happened, I’ve literally lied to them about how I’m doing.
can’t imagine why trusting the agreeable electrified foolin’ machine created by sociopaths can’t not help
I think it also has something to do with how distanced most of us are from creation and maintenance of machines, particularly electronics. if you don't quite understand what a transistor is, or how code works, or how a large language model turns inputs into outputs, then "well there must be a little dude in there somewhere" makes as much sense as anything. Plus people tend to personify inanimate objects to begin with.
then "well there must be a little dude in there somewhere"
One of my earliest memories is my mom showing me how a cash register works and telling me there was a little gremlin inside the machine powering it.
It's true though, they eat the coins. Times have been tough for cash register gremlins since everyone started using cards to pay for everything. 
I don’t really understand how to explain to people who don’t understand that chatgpt is the same as when your phone guesses what you’re going to say next word, but on turbo mode. If they still don’t get it after that then I don’t know what to do to explain it further. Just fucking get it man!!
I try to tell them that the machine is just calculating what the next word is to follow the previous word. It doesnt understand the context of what it's saying, only that these words fit together right.
At risk of sounding ignorant...
There has to be more to it than that, right? I mean these tools can write working code in whatever language I need, using the libraries I specify, and it just spits out this code in seconds. The code is 90% of the way there.
LLMs can also read charts and correctly assess what's going on, can create stock trading strategies using recent data, can create recipes that work implying some level of understanding of how to cook, etc. It's kinda scary how much these things can do. Now that my job is training these models I see how far they've come in just coding, and they will 100% replace a LOT of developers.
can create recipes that work implying some level of understanding of how to cook
Being able to emulate patterns does not actually indicate some sort of higher level of understanding. You aren't going to get innovative new recipes, they are either just paraphrasing what they have read many people describe or they are cobbling together words.
There has to be more to it than that, right?
No, there really isn't. You're just pigging backing off of the exploited labor of working class engineers and enjoying the luxury of living away from the blood soaked externalities that make your chatbot sing.
If AI actually did what you think it does then why would the capitalist class support it? A computer program that is the might of millions of workers? How would the control of the capitalist class continue to exist?
Or the more reasonable explanation that like smartphones and crypto, there exists a very lucrative profit incentive for the capitalist leach to create profit margins out of thin air. Westerners are trained to overconsume so this doesn't come as a suprise.
Because the llms have been trained on however many cured data sets with mostly correct info. It sees how many times a phrase has been used in relation to other phrases, calculates the probability of if this is the correct output, then gambles on a certain preprogrammed risk tolerance, and spits out the output. Of course the software engineers will polish it up with barriers to keep it within certain boundaries,
But the key thing is that the llm doesnt understand the fundamental concepts of what you're asking it.
I'm not a programmer, so I could be misunderstanding the overall process, but from what I've seen on how llms work and are trained, AI makes a very good attempt of what you almost wanted. I don't how quickly AI will progress, but for now I I just see it as an extremely expensive party trick
I feel really grateful that I was exposed to Markov chain bots on irc back in the day as it was a powerful inoculant.
Also add in the fact that public school education is abysmal and burger brains think a computer that can do some basic common sense shit is godlike.
The appeal of LLMs seems uncomfortably similar to how Thomas Jefferson enthusiastically employed dumb waiters to limit interaction with enslaved people.
I think Americans are primed to feel very enthusiastic about anything that tells them things they already believe, even moreso if it sounds very confident and organized. And people are already prone to woowoo stuff.
I don't think you'd break the spell if you informed everyone it's just lines of code that doesn't think. A statistically significant number of Americans claim to talk with spirits and angels, or have the gift of prophecy. On the flip side the techbro types believe in garbage like the future basilisk AI that tortures evseryone forever. These same people are already deranged, all the LLM does is organize their mashed potato brains into sentences that can be read. And just about every major LLM seems primed to have a very servile, docile writing style so it's trivial to get them to say whatever you want so long as you keep saying the same thing. They're not well designed for confrontation.
I firmly believe one of the best ways to deal with reactionaries, woowoo types peddling scams, or conspiracy theorists is to simply tell them they're a fucking idiot. "That sounds fucking stupid. Shut up, nerd, and never speak to me about this again." That's how you do it, that's how you dispell stuff. Social embarrassment and confrontation.
An LLM won't do that, it'll rub a nice mental salve on your already smooth brain. It's an actual echo chamber.
On the flip side the techbro types believe in garbage like the future basilisk AI that tortures evseryone forever
makes a bit of noise but i doubt all that many people are true believers compared to the population who has ever touched computer for a living
Eh, back in the day we were getting advice from people who stood over cracks in the ground and got high off ethane or tossing knucklebones (as one of the less gross options) to see the future. Humans have always been susceptible to magical thinking and a lot of us can remember when personal computing was barely functional, so it's not surprising that ChatGPT seems like a quantum leap to some people.
The fact that someone has written a program that's capable of convincing people that it's god still has terrifying implications and I for one am not excited about the prospect of a wave of computer-inspired stochastic terrorism, but I don't think this is a sign that contemporary people are uniquely dumb.
back in the day
cracks in the ground
Oracles? Back in your day you had oracles? Damn, Hexbear is so diverse that we have immortal leftists shitposting on here.
It's called the immortal science, if you aren't working to transcend your flesh prison, you need to elevate your game.
I described it to a friend once as an "ass-kissing machine" and it completely changed her view of it, recognising that that is exactly what it does, it just says what you want to hear.
A lot of people feel like they never have any control or any sense of recognition of their "hard work" so an ass kissing bot is perfect to stroke the ego of someone who desperately wants someone to tell them that their ideas are good and clever, and to take "interest" in what they say.
I was talking to my father in law today and he's worried that it's going to skynet us or like, make us dependent on it and then quit helping or something.
I tried explaining that it's not a robot, it's not an AI, it's not C-3PO. It's a very elaborate autocomplete. It can't even do kindergarten level arithmetic consistently, which a basic calculator can accomplish, and it's because it's just autocomplete.
"Yeah, but what if it starts teaching itself."
I love the man but God damn people think this thing is so much more than it is.
Not sure I'd generalize like that. IMO you'll find very obvious correlations between the people who tend to use AI regularly because they're living Dunning Kruger types who always believe they have the great "talent" or "the genious idea" but just need the magic tool to make it work, those who have been "forced" to use it at work e.g some programmers and finaly those that as you say just make excuses for it and may not even use it but nevertheless consume the slop consciously and happily(e.g r/chatgpt users) .
I'd guess is a significant majority of the average population who live outside these bubbles are far less favorable towards AI.
Plugging my brain into the machine that turns you into Mathematical Average Internet Meemaw
I'm sorta the opposite: social relationships are so shallow and superficial in late stage capitalism that most social relationships can be replaced with a chatbot. If your social relationships can be summed up as water cooler conversations with coworkers and catching up with your drinking buddies, you might as "socialize" with a chatbot instead. Say what you will about a chatbot, but at least a chatbot won't stab you in the back like the case of socializing with coworkers or turn you into a functioning alcoholic like the case of socializing at a bar.
If your social relationships are limited to having pointless conversations about the weather or traffic or your favorite sports team, then what is the point of the social relationship in the first place?

reread my comment
Okay, that came out a lot more unhinged than how it sounded in my head lmao
Was going to post this as it's own comment but I think I see what you mean.
I was out with some friends recently and most of the discussion was typical small talk, catching up type stuff. Me and 1 friend got into a discussion about music. We were talking about how listening to music by yourself is really an entirely new thing, and that throughout history music has been a communal/social experience. Like when people used to be forced to work 12+ hour days, 6/7 days a week, and then Sunday they'd get together and play music together, and how it was the likely the only good thing going for them.
Then someone else jumps in and says "wow this is so deep" and just completely fucking killed the whole vibe, conversation went back to shallow small talk. It was as if the conversation being deeper than "what have you been up to?" actually bothered this person. And it was barely even a "deep" thing to talk about!
I think you're absolutely right that late stage capitalism has utterly destroyed our ability to connect. It's like everyone is afraid to say anything beyond the superficial for some reason
It was as if the conversation being deeper than "what have you been up to?" actually bothered this person. And it was barely even a "deep" thing to talk about!
There are many people who are uncomfortable with conversations that involve some form of personal investment