this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
114 points (98.3% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14176 readers
663 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
if therapy was rigorous we wouldn't have to suffer through dozens of wrong therapists.
probably this. drugs didn't help either,
I just don’t agree that these are good analogies.
Why? If they are bad analogies, there must be a reason for that to be the case.
Yes and yes. I'm hiring them because they perform a service in exchange for money. It's not reasonable to expect them to care on an individual level about my taxes or my broken leg, I just need them to do their job.
What are your outcome measures for therapy, personally?
One big issue with therapy is that it's difficult to afford unless you have a good job or are on a state-sponsored health plan. The people who are in that welfare cliff are arguably some of the people who need it the most.
And then, once you get it, it's often restricted to "you will have twelve 45-minute sessions to address the issue". It really cannot function properly in a transactional, capitalist model. To really have an impact, it needs to tie in with the pace of life, and if this doesn't take the form of a figure who's present outside the office/clinic, it's prohibitively costly and/or slow to try to link the professional up with the on-the-ground reality.
What we now have access to is something that's on-demand, 24/7, for better or for worse. The provider/client model canmot match this.