569
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 43 points 4 days ago

So we have multiple murders or attempted murders of Palestinian children in the US since October 7.

But pro-zionist students on college campuses claimed they feel somehow threatened there. Clearly that should be more important than actual attacks.

[-] FinnFooted@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago

What this woman did was a heinous hate crime. But this isn't the oppression Olympics. There has been a rise in antisemitism too. No need to diminish that in order to assert that hate crimes against Palestinian people is bad.

[-] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 18 points 4 days ago

There is a very systematic and deliberate propaganda effort by many US media, infamously the New York times at the forefront to downplay antimuslim and general racist attacks and overexaggerate feelings of insecurity that do not represent actual danger. As a result of this peaceful campus protests including anti-zionist Jews have been brutally beaten down by the police and fascist mobs. So under the pretense of fighting antisemitism Jews are getting beaten up on campus. But according to the Zionists those are the "wrong kind of Jews" or "self hating Jews" so attacking them is justified in their eyes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

When antizionism is wrapped up in antisemitism, it’s very easy to see why there is an uptick. There’s no such false equivalence for Palestinians.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Illegalmexicant@lemmy.world 135 points 4 days ago

Wow. Made it 42 years and thought "I need to murder a child"

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 59 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

To be fair, it was a toddler.

/s in case that wasn't obvious.

Also, "possible hate crime"? It clearly was. Getting really tired of these bullshit headlines that don't actually say what happened. The "alleged" for the crime since they haven't been convicted is already in the headline, that's fine, I get he legal distinction there, but then say what's actually alleged and don't try to hide the reality of what's alleged. This is clearly a hate crime, there's no question of that. It's not an alleged possible hate crime, it's just an alleged hate crime.

According to a press release from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the mother appeared to be visibly Muslim, as she was wearing a hijab and modest swimwear to the pool at the time of the incident.

Police said Wolf also asked the mother if two of the children in the pool were hers before allegedly attempting to grab one of them, a 6-year-old boy, who was able to get away.

Wolf also allegedly snatched the mother’s headscarf off while she tried to save her daughter and beat her with it, according to CAIR.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 45 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

She was charged with attempted capital murder and injury to a child. ... The Euless Police Department has recommended that the incident be considered a hate crime and the Tarrant County District Attorney’s Office is currently investigating it

"Alleged" is what the DA has charged.

"Possible" is what the DA might add to the charges.

The opinions of the reporter, who is not a lawyer much less a prosecutor, are not helpful.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Publishers have to use the walking on eggshells language even when it’s obvious what happened because of libel laws. You’re not guilty until convicted in a court of law. Until that point, everything is allegedly, possibly, appears to be.

load more comments (1 replies)

It's a CYA thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

In that kind of mindset, it's not "child", it's "human animal".

[-] littletranspunk@lemmus.org 60 points 4 days ago

drown 3 year old ... child

That's just being fucking demonic for the public

Palestinian Muslim

With current events, yes its a hate crime

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago

I mean shouldn't it be a hate crime regardless of current events?

But yes.

A hate crime is when the crime intentionally targets a specific demographic.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

So it should still be considered a hate crime regardless of current events, no?

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 9 points 4 days ago

The attempted murderer said very specific racist things while trying to drown the child.

It's a hate crime as well as attempted murder.

[-] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago

This women attempted murder after confirming the mother was Palestinian. Textbook hate crime.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 64 points 4 days ago

This happened in Texas?

I’m amazed she was even arrested. I’m assuming a full pardon with an apology will be forthcoming.

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

She wasn't successful in killing the child, so no, no pardon from Abbott. He only pardons actual convicted killers of hate crimes.

https://www.texastribune.org/2024/05/16/daniel-perry-greg-abbott-pardon/

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Nah. In Texas all she has to do is say that God told her to do it, and she'll get a couple years of taking drugs in a hospital.

The exception is Taylor Parker because she killed an ~unborn~ child, and that's a damn step too far.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 16 points 3 days ago

"possible hate crime".....

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

It’s not the journalist’s job to determine that, it’s a court’s job to do so. Until then, everything is alleged or possible.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

You can use less washy words. For example you can say "a woman has been accused of a hate crime, if these alligatons are true then..."

The way these stories are written now not only use the "allegedly" they also tend to use language that down plays the event.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

Reading the article made the word possible a lot less necessary than expected.

"

Police responded to the apartment complex pool in Euless around 5:44 p.m. May 19 regarding “a disturbance between two women,” Euless police said in a news release.

“Upon arrival, officers were told by witnesses that a woman who was very intoxicated had tried to drown a child and argued with the child’s mother,” police said.

The child’s mother, 32, told police that the suspect, identified as Elizabeth Wolf, 42, questioned where she was from and made statements about her not being American, as well as “other racial statements.”

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, said in a news release that the mother visibly appeared to be Muslim, as she was wearing a hijab and modest swimwear. Wolf also asked the woman whether two of the children in the pool were hers before she tried to grab one of them, a 6-year-old boy, who was able to get away, police alleged.

“The mother began helping her son when Wolf grabbed her 3-year-old daughter and forced her underwater,” police said. “The mother was able to pull her daughter from the water. Her daughter had been yelling for help and was coughing up water.”

"

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 11 points 4 days ago

Fucking hell. That woman needs to be sectioned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago

Same people are demanding to bring the Bible in school

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"Thou shalt not kill" *

* Only applies to solid white christians. Heaven still available with apology and proper donation.

[-] dch82@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Love thy neighbour as thyself*

* T&Cs apply. Subject to limited availability. We may collect your data to train our LLM. Check the website for privacy policy.

[-] Doom@ttrpg.network 27 points 4 days ago

Just toss this one off a cliff save the money

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

When you have so much hate in you that you're willing to murder a child, yet you'll guaranteed think that you're a really good person who just tries to make the world a little better.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Don't think of them as children. Think of them as Future Hamas Military Age Males.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Pretty sure the child in question was a girl, but I guess the woman didn't want to let facts stand in the way of her feeling

What the Jesus Fucking Christ

[-] ours@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

My money is on "alt-right" brain rot. Some people actually believe they are in a holy/race war for survival.

Poor, poor bastards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 28 points 4 days ago

Wanting to murder a child I can understand but you're not supposed to actually do it. Wtf is wrong with people these days.

[-] Alteon@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

Y'allqueda in full swing in the US.

Ain't no hate like Christian love.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

If you don't consider them human, you don't consider it murdering a human child.

That's the problem with bigotry. It makes people view others as less-than-human.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Deadful@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago
[-] tover153@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 4 days ago

She actually needs the DA to add those hate crimes to the charges so that Abbott can pardon her later, just attempted capital murder and injury to a child aren't going to cut it with him.

[-] OkGo@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago

Hate is an irrational emotion.

Aren't emotions by definition irrational?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
569 points (97.2% liked)

News

21656 readers
6054 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS