Fizz

Its a large majority. Over 70%

My initial statement was much stronger but i knew people would be like omg not all homeless are bad. I can't say good or bad because i dont think people are that simple but they absolutely are more likely to commit anti social behaviour which I hate.

Welfare provides enough money to rent a place, buy utilities and food. So the only people who end up homeless are the drug addicts or people unable to meet basic decency requirements. This makes it so a majority of the homeless are horrible. They attack people, crash out on random strangers, shit up whichever area they are put into.

We've tried housing them it doesnt do anything except make the area horrible for normal people. We have an emergency housing system where you can go into the welfare office and tell them you're about to be homeless and they find you a place to stay but its at the point where people show up and say they'd rather be homeless than live next to these people.

So for these people I'd pay the extra costs to house them in jail but they technically havent been convicted of a crime to be put in jail.

Depends on the homeless person. There are some I'd pay anything to make sure they were housed in a jailcell.

Have you been on steam at all in the last decade? A review saying "this game is woke and has muslims" in it is so mild. Its not 2014 anymore.

I got a year of ultimate plan for half price and moved everything over. Now im having to move away because its way to expensive for what it is and this is while they're still fighting for market share.

I like PDS and watched for over a decade. but ive had to stop treating it like a news source. I feel his coverage is not informative unless you live under a rock and need a quick rundown of what's happening. He oversimplifies to the point of being misleading definitively leaves out contrary info and makes way stronger claims than the evidence really supports. He knows his audience (me included) and spins the story for them and in reality its probably not him but his writing team.

His interviews with officials are still good.

People really take the wan show way to seriously.

Out of all the things to get mad about this is wild.

You're right. I have no idea how I read your initial comment and jump to that conclusion. I must have been tired when i replied.

For the actual response. I think this law does partial combat the misinformation,advertising and brainwashing concerns. I dont think we can/need to prevent misinformation, advertising or brainwashing for people over 16 without serious infringement on civil liberties.

For algorithm's its far less feasible to go after. These companies protect the algorithm because its the core IP of their business. Its not something we can simply get rid of without destroying the most popular feature of the platform.

You love to see it hope this counter offensive goes well. Prokrovs has been a fucking death trap and russia has massed 150k troops in the region. The Russians are posting footage where they are walking past a graveyard on the way into the city. Arms and legs and bodies everywhere.

Well that would be a much bigger line to cross. Its reasonable to say under 16s are to young to navigate the world of online info. But its completely different to say no age can go on the internet.