this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
13 points (93.3% liked)

TechTakes

2601 readers
60 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Want to wade into the rainbow-ridden surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 1 points 3 minutes ago

Doctorow says that we have to believe people when they say that LLMs are helpful for their work. Do we also have to believe people who say that alcohol makes them better drivers?

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/how-to-burst-the-ai-bubble-strike-at-its-roots/

[–] mirrorwitch@awful.systems 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

ponzi scheme capitalists: and we're going to hoard and burn all the RAM and nobody will be able to buy RAM anymore

me: pfff whatever computers suck anyway I would never buy a computer, besides they have too much RAM these days, 512MB ought to be enough for everybody

ponzi scheme capitalists: we're also going to hoard all SSDs

me: great, maybe people will go back to writing things on sustainable and attention-friendly paper and leave a bit of a durable legacy, like old books

ponzi scheme capitalists: old books, you say? tell me more about those old books of yours

me: ョ゚Д゚)o

https://www.srf.ch/kultur/gesellschaft-religion/jagd-auf-alte-buecher-ki-firmen-kaufen-antiquariate-leer-und-vernichten-die-buecher

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

“The assumption is: you have to physically own the books and destroy them after ‘reading’ them – in order to argue that no unauthorized copy remains in circulation and that it qualifies as fair use,” the bookseller says of the presumed logic behind it.

Have any actual courts ruled in favor of this nonsense? Because I thought fair use was tied to things like public benefit and transformation more than a direct number of copies. Like, I'm pretty sure that I'm not allowed to fax a book to myself even if I put the original through a shredder, and that's ignoring the question of how much gets inexorably lost in the process.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 1 points 2 hours ago

Alsup put this as a point in Anthropic's favour in the recent authorial class action, so now it's received wisdom.

[–] rook@awful.systems 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How it started: in 2025, the city of dublin, ohio (the latter detail missed by quite a lot of reporting,because there are no other dublins it might get confused with, I guess) gets an autonomous? ai powered police surveillance robot.

City officials are encouraging residents to interact with Dubbot—ask questions, take selfies, and experience firsthand how AI is shaping public safety. The goal is to foster transparency and gather feedback to refine the robot’s role in the community.

How it’s going

The person-sized, camera-covered robot that looked like it rolled right out of a sci-fi movie did not identify any criminal incidents, issue any tickets or help with any arrests in its nearly 10 months on the job.

On the other hand, I bet it didn’t shoot anyone’s dog, so who’s to say that the $64k was wasted.

[–] mirrorwitch@awful.systems 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I never understand how these things aren't simply stolen and dismantled for parts? Where I come from I bet that would happen within a fortnight. yes there's cameras and GPS locators etc. but there's ways around that, it's not that hard...

[–] rook@awful.systems 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t want to do that myself… personally too much tracking gear in there, and it’s easy to make a mistake and not disable it all. Also, you just know that if you get caught, they’ll try and prosecute it like you kidnapped and dismembered a regular officer.

Now, I’m more surprised that they don’t get black bagged and tipped over. Maybe they only ever use them in super thoroughly surveilled areas with nearby human backup, but you’d expect at least one successful tipping to make the news somewhere.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Or somebody talking the bot into driving of stairs/into a river. If it ever freezes enough getting it on ice will also be fun.

10 year olds will have so much fun with these things.

[–] nfultz@awful.systems 8 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

New findings in Bayesian tragedy

The inspection is being led by the chief prosecutor of Termini Imerese, Angelo Vittorio Cavallo. According to Italian news outlets, the technical and investigative team is evaluating whether the crew underestimated the rapidly worsening weather conditions and whether the measures taken to weather the storm were adequate.

The Bayesian went down in the early hours of 19 August 2024 near Porticello, close to Palermo, while at anchor. The tragedy claimed seven lives, including British tech entrepreneur Mike Lynch, his daughter Hannah, ship’s cook Recaldo Thomas, Morgan Stanley International chair Jonathan Bloomer and his wife Judy, and attorney Chris Morvillo and his wife Neda.

The yacht’s captain, James Cutfield, along with crew members Tim Eaton and Matthew Griffith, are under investigation.

time to update our priors

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 3 points 3 hours ago

shame about the cook

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If you switch to a new kind of tainted beef, that's updating your prions

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 8 points 7 hours ago

The traditional way to exchange brain worms has been replaced by LW forum tho

[–] nfultz@awful.systems 12 points 18 hours ago

https://www.fastcompany.com/91562297/daters-say-ai-dependence-gives-them-the-ick h/t naked capitalism

Younger daters are especially likely to view AI reliance as a red flag. While 56% of Millennial respondents said they wouldn’t date someone who uses AI regularly, that figure rose to 64% among Gen Z.

More than half of Gen Z daters surveyed said they’d consider it a dealbreaker if someone used AI for career advice or spending decisions, compared with 46% and 44% of Millennials, respectively.

? the kids are alright ?

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Polymarket was caught faking winnings via influencers Wonder if they paid any of our 'friends', or if they promoted it all for free.

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Given how our very good friends were promoting the concept of prediction markets for ideological/idiot-logical reasons before polymarket existed I'm pretty sure they didn't need to be bribed or set up. Just let them show off that someone actually made the real thing they were pitching as a concept a decade ago and pretend all the issues don't exist.

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 5 points 13 hours ago

Scott Alexander funded a prediction-market startup which uses points not dollars. I think many of our friends lack the ovaries to bet significant numbers of real dollars on Kalshi or Polymarket.

[–] nfultz@awful.systems 1 points 18 hours ago

https://www.fastcompany.com/91562297/daters-say-ai-dependence-gives-them-the-ick h/t naked capitalism

Younger daters are especially likely to view AI reliance as a red flag. While 56% of Millennial respondents said they wouldn’t date someone who uses AI regularly, that figure rose to 64% among Gen Z.

More than half of Gen Z daters surveyed said they’d consider it a dealbreaker if someone used AI for career advice or spending decisions, compared with 46% and 44% of Millennials, respectively.

? the kids are alright ?

[–] maol@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

AI shite creeping into everyday life, example #1928748392:

I was out mattress shopping today. It was enjoyably ridiculous - the sales assistant measured my "pillow size" using a big contraption (apparently I'm a 2). However while testing a mattress I saw a video display advertising an "AI" widget to go with a specific "motion" mattress.

Baffled, I searched this up later.

AI voice control & Anti-snore box

Create your own spa-like oasis from the comfort of your own home by combining this Anti-snore Voice Control Box with our U210 and N700 motion bases. This range combines the very best and innovative technology with unbeatable comfort to give you the ultimate relaxation experience. Whether you want the optimal sleeping position or to spend your evenings unwinding with a good book, set offers luxurious comfort at the tip of your fingers.

I think this is un-enjoyably ridiculous. It's not really clear what's "AI" about it.

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 2 points 16 hours ago

Imagine sleeping by lying down and closing your eyes peasant.

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I guess the voice recognition probably used some kind of machine learning?

[–] maol@awful.systems 2 points 15 hours ago

It seems possible, but they don't actually explain....

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Today (actually sourced to Perun's video from a few weeks back but I watched it today) in Everything is Connected:

One of the advancements in one-way attack drones in the Russian invasion of Ukraine has been the move to directly-connected fiber optic cables for control. This has proven an effective way to counter electronic warfare, but has also meant that both sides have started using a volume of fiber optic cable that boggles the mind. This made the single fiber optic manufacturer in Russia a substantial strategic target, which Ukraine obligingly took advantage of. In turn, this has forced Russia to rely completely on imports, placing the Russian war effort in direct competition with China's AI datacenter buildout for this now-vital resource.

China being a proudly socialist country, this allowed the fiber optic manufacturers to raise their prices through the roof and absolutely take the Russians (and presumably their AI customers) to the cleaners.

Never let it be said that there are no AI-tangential stories that you can't feel at least a little bit good about, even if it is just the endless grift nexus capturing an even bigger bastard.

[–] schnoopy@awful.systems 5 points 16 hours ago

The staggering amount of resources being poured into warehouses of machines that run code that create plausible text is mindblowing. A lot of stuff is ongoing cost too.

For something which — as far as I've seen — can halfarse busywork nobody cares about, steal code from github/approximate yaasnippet if you don't mind having to review code made with ducttape and a dream, or sort of act like a DM with alzheimers for very lonely people.

What are we even doing here? Even if governments think "Oh well we better trial it a bit because maybe it'll be useful" why would you expend so much human life on a slim possibility.

[–] nfultz@awful.systems 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'll yes-and you, Ukraine faces higher costs also, ie https://dronexl.co/2026/05/11/ukraine-fiber-optic-spool-price-ai-data-center-demand/

now serving with Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces, said in a May 10 post on X that his unit used to buy 50-kilometer fiber optic spools for $300. Today, he said, “it’s easily $2,500.”

China makes money on both sides, plus the data centers you mentioned. Compare/contrast with Iran, who switched from GPS to Chinese nav to also get around jamming because leashes don't get that long... and China also makes money.

But locally, my BIL who runs fiber for a rural ISP, says basically they still make way more on recycling the copper wire they pull out than they pay for fiber. IDK.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 4 points 7 hours ago

yeah china just makes things, i doubt that iranian military ever had a shot at getting american gnss receivers. any of modern civilian ones allows for use of signals from all 4 constellations anyway, and the jamming resistance comes from either using encrypted signals or by using more sophisticated receivers that have tiny phased array and can cut out a zone where jammer is (to some degree)