anise

looks cool, might join somewhere next week!

I… don't think saying looksmaxxing is in some way trans is meant as an insult? The way we tend to think of gender dysphoria is as a diagnosis specifically meant for people experiencing a different gender than the one assigned to them at birth, ie. trans people. A lot of people are now starting to point out that dysphoria is experienced by a lot of cis people as well. Although I suppose the guy in the comic almost definitely exists and I don't want to run defense for him so: fuck that guy.

OT: Finally had to break with a long-time friend after he started sliding more and more into fascism. Feeling quite overwhelmed and emotionally exhausted right now.

if you like them in a gay way yes

It feels like someone being overwhelmed/exhausted to the point of saying "fuck it, I don't care anymore" and afterwards rationalising the use of LLMs as the only way they can keep up, while simultaneously falling for it's addiction. It does demonstrate why relying on one-man projects without chipping in is risky. Unfortunately the companies that rely on it are probably also captured by the bubble so they won't think so.

I think the openbsd reimplementation is as of yet untouched at least, so that is an option

I don't think a lot of strangers on the internet are going to convince you. If you actually want to change your view it seems more productive to me to seek out information about LLMs* (it's functioning, the people currently behind it, how large models actually get powered, etc.) on your own than to argue endlessly with people here.

*preferably without using one

1. have you actually managed to read project lawful? because I'd like to know more about it but it is incredibly unreadable

2. what the fuck

Isn't this exactly the managed democracy of helldivers 2?*

*I have not played the game, all I know is through cultural osmosis

I'll see when these hashes materialise, until then I have to assume LLM companies are lying always about everything.

See, the problem is that I am not talking about human researchers, I am talking about other methods of automated fuzzing. I believe mozilla is overstating how useful the LLM has actually been. This has many reasons, one of them being that their main source of income is trying to become an LLM company. If that project fails said company might have to make some unfortunate cuts.

The problem is that I do not believe a word that anthropic says. They say this is only 1%, but do they have any proof to back it up? I am also sceptical of the claim that it can "look at the entire repo and how it all works together". It can produce an approximation which could give it an advantage over more traditional fuzzers, but most reported bugs are still very local(and/or non-existant) and easily ruled out if it could actually model the naur theory behind the code.

The problem is that not "many actors" are able to attack at this scale, because running a scan at this scale is extremely expensive. If I were to run a thousand fuzzers on a piece of code I will almost certainly find a vulnerability, but I can't do that because of the prohibitive cost. Anthropic is essentially buying marketing by doing this to make their product seem more useful than it is.