lurker

joined 2 months ago
[–] lurker@awful.systems 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anthropic’s latest model that they haven’t released to the public yet since they’re worried its gonna fuck up cybersecurity this thread goes over it a bit

[–] lurker@awful.systems 5 points 3 days ago

My CEO who is a known hype-man is a massive liar? shock horror

seriously, anyone who listens to Scam Altman these days is an idiot

[–] lurker@awful.systems 7 points 6 days ago

If you have to set up that many rules to get around the inherent flaw of “gambling on everyone’s lives” just run a normal ass poll. gets rid of unnecessary financial incentives

[–] lurker@awful.systems 6 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I will never understand why people seriously bet “yes” on these types of things. Like you either loose the bet and loose money or you win the bet and die

[–] lurker@awful.systems 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Technically yes, but Yud probably wouldn’t count that, since the AI didn’t have the express purpose of destroying everyone

[–] lurker@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So there’s a chance that Anthropic won’t be able to go after anyone with the Claude codebase because copyright laws?

[–] lurker@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago

Well this is out now, and I'm surprised to announce the ratings went down from 7.5 from 7.1 on imdb and only 60/100 on Metacritic, though there are only 9 critic reviews and 5 user reviews, which itself is surprising for being so little. Rotten Tomatoes is higher, but only 38 critic reviews and over 50 ratings. I'm surprised it seems to be so unpopular, I thought it'd be blowing up with hundreds of ratings

[–] lurker@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This article on the brand of journalism that's just parroting what the CEOs say, otherwise known as "CEO said a thing!" journalism

[–] lurker@awful.systems 1 points 1 week ago

Oh really? Damn didn’t know that. Wouldn’t be surprised if Trump somehow manages to bypass the injunction, because Trump. You are right they could drop it due to their old person mental fatigue but they could keep chasing because this is a deeply petty and childish administration

[–] lurker@awful.systems 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

On the subject of AI and the war in Iran, it feels pretty likely to me that the DoD will explode Anthropic with criminal/legal charges in August like they threatened to (unless Dario steps down), which will definitely be ugly

[–] lurker@awful.systems 8 points 2 weeks ago

Cheers, I'll drink to that

 

Originally posted in the Stubsack, but decided to make it its own post because why not

 

this was already posted on reddit sneerclub, but I decided to crosspost it here so you guys wouldn’t miss out on Yudkowsky calling himself a genre savy character, and him taking what appears to be a shot at the Zizzians

 

originally posted in the thread for sneers not worth a whole post, then I changed my mind and decided it is worth a whole post, cause it is pretty damn important

Posted on r/HPMOR roughly one day ago

full transcript:

Epstein asked to call during a fundraiser. My notes say that I tried to explain AI alignment principles and difficulty to him (presumably in the same way I always would) and that he did not seem to be getting it very much. Others at MIRI say (I do not remember myself / have not myself checked the records) that Epstein then offered MIRI $300K; which made it worth MIRI's while to figure out whether Epstein was an actual bad guy versus random witchhunted guy, and ask if there was a reasonable path to accepting his donations causing harm; and the upshot was that MIRI decided not to take donations from him. I think/recall that it did not seem worthwhile to do a whole diligence thing about this Epstein guy before we knew whether he was offering significant funding in the first place, and then he did, and then MIRI people looked further, and then (I am told) MIRI turned him down.

Epstein threw money at quite a lot of scientists and I expect a majority of them did not have a clue. It's not standard practice among nonprofits to run diligence on donors, and in fact I don't think it should be. Diligence is costly in executive attention, it is relatively rare that a major donor is using your acceptance of donations to get social cover for an island-based extortion operation, and this kind of scrutiny is more efficiently centralized by having professional law enforcement do it than by distributing it across thousands of nonprofits.

In 2009, MIRI (then SIAI) was a fiscal sponsor for an open-source project (that is, we extended our nonprofit status to the project, so they could accept donations on a tax-exempt basis, having determined ourselves that their purpose was a charitable one related to our mission) and they got $50K from Epstein. Nobody at SIAI noticed the name, and since it wasn't a donation aimed at SIAI itself, we did not run major-donor relations about it.

This reply has not been approved by MIRI / carefully fact-checked, it is just off the top of my own head.

 

I searched for “eugenics” on yud’s xcancel (i will never use twitter, fuck you elongated muskrat) because I was bored, got flashbanged by this gem. yud, genuinely what are you talking about

view more: next ›