jaschop

Disappointing that this submission was accepted, though no reason to despair.

It is one event in a very solid looking lineup, and in it they are basically pitching a thing. They wanna be the idea guys, not announce a new flagship KDE app.

Die Liste gesperrter Domains fand ich interessant. Einige meiner favorisierten Internetz-Seiten sind drauf 👌.

My line break produced some good comedy:

Posting at Anthropic (Annual Salary: $295,000 - $345,000 USD)

Meh, Benn Jordan did it better.

I think his offer still stands that, despite humanoid robots being stupid, if Unitree sends him one he will film himself having a boxing match with it.

You're right of course, stupid engineering like that will kill people and already has.

From an emergency responder perspective I'm mostly asking how can I keep my squad safe and how can I rescue survivors. Once we're there we usually got all the tools you would ever need. And I'm 100% sure, if someone is in danger I'm breaking out the can opener before I would ever bother to call remote support.

The door handles don't sound so bad from a firefighter perspective. More excuses to break out the slicy claw. ಠᴗಠ

Having to account for the stupid thing to start driving on its own for no reason seems more irritating. Maybe we can invest in some big jaws attached to the front of the truck to crunch down on and immobilize struggling robo-taxis. This seems like a very reasonable direction to develop car technology.

I expect we're gonna hear more about the cherry-picked data points that aren't atrocious for AI. Like specifically the "help me learn" usage stat (the only one where some AI users are on par or better), and the even more specific "help me learn" usage with AI/media literacy discussed in class stat.

There's probably all kinds of interesting factors involved that had to be ignored because they needed an AI fluff statistic. Like the one fact they mention, that high AI-use and partly non-AI use correllate with curiousity. Kids who want information will use the tools given to them, and those are often LLMs. If your teachers are into AI and discuss it in class, even more so. I expect the "once or twice a year"-users (who bottom out every chart) to include a big bulk of kids that just do not care about education (often coming from unpriviliged households), so they use it to cheat on their assignments and call it a day.

Pretty undeniable though, that the daily users are always worse than the sometimes users. That's probably the habitual delegation of thought kicking in. I could accept that a subgroup of the AI users learns on par or sliiiightly better than non-users on average, but they might be building up a reliance on tooling that will serve them worse and worse once they get past well-trodden school problems. In the same vein they're probably all getting fucked, because noone gives a fuck about good text books & reference materials anymore.

@supersquirrel@lemmy.ca I suppose this is a score for you apropos our recent discussion on industrial espionage. Although I'll note that the domain they tried to take over this time (dickwaving with math proofs) does also not have a business model, so they're not really working themselves out of their financial death sentence.

I need to remember the multiple people that pointed me to Next.js and lose some respect retroactively. Though it did feel like a sneaky Vercel ad even back then.

Nein

Hamma denn die blaue absolute Mehrheit? Hab kein Bock Nachrichten zu schauen.

Isn't evolution beatiful? Each of these specimen has adapted to fit a highly specific niche, it's knob optimized to predate a specific style of trouser pocket or even certain belt loops.