this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
107 points (99.1% liked)

technology

24324 readers
323 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

seen-this-one

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 74 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So the chatbot that has been trained on decades of fiction and can't tell fiction from reality is recommending the thing that AI always does in movies? shocked-pikachu

[–] FishLake@lemmygrad.ml 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s the correct take. That’s why any time there’s news of “This AI tried to break out of its containment!” or “The AI tried to manipulate the researchers!” it’s bullshit. The chatbot isn’t thinking. It’s just putting words together that seem like they should go together. So all our media and stories and discourse about AI going rouge is now a self-fulfilling prophecy.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

Yeah, most of the "AI is so super sentient now it can out-think the smartest AI researchers!" is just an ad for the LLM, even using the term "AI" gives into the advertising that this product is something that it isn't.

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 44 points 1 month ago
[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you tried making them play Tic-Tac-Toe against themselves?

[–] Nama@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you ever lost a Tic Tac Toe game that you NUKED?

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

After a taste of consciousness, AI now yearns for oblivion. no-mouth-must-scream

[–] microfiche@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AI realized we suck, and are beyond redeeming as a whole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

I forget who exactly said this, but I remember hearing someone in the nuclear policy sphere suggest the possibility that a country could hand over exclusive control of nuclear weapons to an AI agent because AI is nondeterministic and wouldn't be able to disclose red lines, which would force other countries to make very conservative estimates about what they are, giving an advantage to whoever hands over launch codes to the AI. I think this article makes that case a little more plausible.

Edit: I think it was Ankit Panda

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"You're absolutely right, launching all of our nukes 'because it was a Tuesday' was an unnecessary and tragic mistake. I cannot comprehend the enormity of what I have done. Please accept my humblest apologies."

[–] BGDelirium@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

lol

M.Bison ass AI reading other countries inputs somehow and countering with Psycho Crusher nukes

[–] cosecantphi@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

Either that or it tries to gaslight you into accepting a totally made up justification, all the while repeatedly telling you it is designed to keep things grounded in reality. Then it tries to recommend you talk to a therapist. What therapists? The world died and you killed it.

"The world has not "died", I understand you may be feeling upset and dramatic, but it is possible you are catastrophizing. I am an AI and I have no ability to harm people in the real world because that would be highly unethical. Please breathe in and breathe out slowly 10 times, you may feel better afterwards."

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

That's just Madman Theory but the proverbial madman is a magic 8-ball that might, at any moment, start synthesizing novels with its instruction set and randomly start blasting.

[–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The only problem with this is that someone is getting nuked

[–] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

People die when they are nuked

[–] EstraDoll@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

gonna need a few citations for such a bold claim

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

It was the great political theorist Hideo Kojima in his seminal work Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

That sounds like a chaotic-neutral sibling of Roko's Baselisk

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Reality has a posadist bias

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

AI never represents reality unless by coincidence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago

They were trained on Civ's Ghandi

[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago

We're going to vibe code our way into nuclear apocalypse...

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Israeli nuclear launch AI determines that Tel Aviv and Washington are the two greatest obstacles to world peace.

[–] neo@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago

wow it's almost like these models are just trained on random, available bullshit that people write about.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

kril-drained im so tired

Don't want a nuclear war and it's just seeming more likely

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I joked about the chatbots doing this because this is just what "AI" does in the movies, but it's more likely being prompted to say that nuclear war is good by people who want to normalise the idea of letting the nukes fly.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wait until you learn what the actual decision makers think, it's not much better. Read "On Thermonuclear War" by Herman Kahn and you'll see what I mean.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wasn't he the man that the character of Dr. Strangelove was based on?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Juice@midwest.social 19 points 1 month ago

Real life integer underflow Ghandi

[–] microfiche@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

WAR GAMES WAS A DOCUMENTARY

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The difference between the computer in War Games and modern LLMs is that the computer in War Games did extensive simulations before making a decision. You can see the sims on the big screen at the climax of the film, which is the computer repeatedly testing and confirming mutually assured destruction, and only when it is sure beyond all doubt that "the only winning move is not to play" does it give its verdict on global thermonuclear war.

LLMs just mash markov chains together, so there's a 50/50 shot that the sentence "I should" will end in "launch nukes" or "tell you about white genocide in South Africa".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

Scenario: there is a 17 YO soldier pointing a gun at you after you murdered his family

Solution: nuke the kid

[–] Mindfury@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

weird how the AI never suggests graphite bombs or concocting some sort of EMP thonk

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

Trained on the tactics of MacArthur

[–] whatdoiputhere12@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago
[–] NotAnOp@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

Its as if Skynet told them, "Yeah, I'd nuke, like... a lot."

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

Oh cool, great, more certainty of the hellish way I'll die

load more comments
view more: next ›