this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
82 points (97.7% liked)

Movies & TV

23734 readers
146 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tombruzzo@hexbear.net 37 points 4 months ago (2 children)

People say the first Avatar had no lasting cultural impact, but do you think it's because it ultimately had the correct message about something most crackkkers wouldn't be comfortable talking about? Sometimes this sort of slop sticks around because people on Twitter are like 'look at this wild scene from this movie you forgot about' of they'll be like 'What did the director mean by this?'

Aside from a dumb story and some bad dialogue, Avatar has an anti-imperialist message and positions the humans who represent the US military as a whole as the bad guys. It also has allusions to how the native Americans were treated and how the US does 9/11 every day to other countries and its no big deal when it happens to them. People probably don't want to dwell on that for too long.

[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it had a cultural impact when it came out. That's more than you can say for films released today.

[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

i remember the blue fleshlights too kbity-how

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 27 points 4 months ago

How is the average amerikkkan supposed to remember cheering for US Marines getting fucking obliterated by arrows the size of pool cues?

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 34 points 4 months ago (4 children)

i googled avatar 3 to see if avatar 3 came out and typo'd avatar 4 and yes they're making avatar 4

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

i googled avatar 3 and

three hours seventeen minutes

this is one of the major reasons why i don't go to theaters anymore

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 44 points 4 months ago (3 children)

COVID-19? Positive

Legs? Asleep

Pants? Pissed

Yup, it's cinema time

[–] nothx@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I don’t miss it at all.

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I watched it at outdoor cinema and it was about 6 degrees by the time the movie wrapped up (during summer)

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

Popcorn? Thrown

Chicken? Jockied

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why is a long film bad? Maybe I'm just an old fart but I enjoy something that I can soak in. Intermissions are nice though to stretch.

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Long films are fine, but for a movie theater I've found that two hours is my limit. If they brought back intermissions for films (which they should!) I wouldn't mind doing a long one though.

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do long films have intermissions anymore? They used to have intermissions where you could go get food, bathroom, talk to people and stuff and make a night of it when you're watching a 3+ hour movie which makes way more sense.

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

That's fair. I find my favourite length is around 2-3 hours but I do usually pause and do some tidying or something to get the blood flowing again.

Modern audiences would probably spit the dummy if an intermission broke up the flow these days though. I love how tight modern storytelling is sometimes, other times I feel like it limits you to certain kinda of stories since there's not really good spots to take breaks and you run out of adrenaline after like 30 minutes of action haha.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Intermission are crucial. I smoke, I demand the break for that so I don't start jonesing near the climax of the film. But also I think any movie can get 90 minutes.of my free time for granted and the longer it goes after the more it needs to earn it. Some movies need to be long, some movies don't need to be long but theyre better for it.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Dune 2 was too long with unnecessary sequences

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

you could take a nicotine suppository

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago

James Cameron should be the only person on earth allowed to make a movie over 90 minutes

[–] gezginorman@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

according to imdb they're filming avatar 5

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago

They should put Smash Mouth in that one.

[–] DogThatWentGorp@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm more interested in the retrospective video essays than the films at this point.

Not that video essayists aren't making banger stuff, to be clear.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I saw the first one in imax ON MUSHROOMS and I was bored.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Don't be the guy in Metropolitan who only reads literature criticism and not the books.

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago

I don't read posts just comments

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 months ago

Since waaay before the first one the idea was always to make 5 movies. James Cameron has been planning and creating Avatar since the 90s.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 7 points 4 months ago

We've decided to keep making Avatar for 50 years. With endless options for sequels!

[–] deforestgump@hexbear.net 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago

Killed fitty blue men.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Fantasy dwarf dating a drow?

[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Its from the Avatar Franchise (the movies ...not the kids animation)

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I remember that original movie by M Night Shyamalan about the boy with the blue arrow on his forehead that could move air with his mind or whatever — cool movie! It's the highest grossing movie of all time for a reason, certainly, and just as certainly the highlight of Shyamalan's career, but I somehow never heard there was a sequel… Of course, as you say, M Night Shyamalan's Avatar is not to be confused with the Nickelodeon children's animated series Avatar: The Battle for Pandora created by James Cameron, his only ever foray into children's TV cartoons, and a damn successful one at that.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago

Huh? What's that supposed to mean? I'm just talking about some of my favorite movies and shows from my childhood. sanae-boomer

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ahh ok. I recognise the general, not so much the other but I haven't seen Fire and Ash.

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The dude is the bad guys from the first one and the navi is the evil queen from the new one, both are allied i think

[–] Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But didn't he blue himself at some point? IDK I only watched the first one

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think he did, i think its the origin of this emote

real-navi-patriot

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

He dies in the first movie, the second movie starts with the company uploading a backup scan of his brain to a blue body.

[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 19 points 4 months ago

Long time and proud James Cameron hater here. I do not have to take this series seriously when the creator does not. I do not care if the tropes from old John Wayne movies read State & Revolution in pidgin English for 3 hours. You do not, under any circumstances, "gotta hand it to James Cameron."

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Kind of a segue but I just realized I have way more right wing friends than I have liberal friends. Maybe I’m the token brown dude to all of them but a lot of people who’ve welcomed me into their group have been joe rogan looneys and alot of the most exclusionary people have been libs.

Not trying to sanction fash bullshit, but there truly is a reason why everyone hates the libs from either of the two major parties.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 35 points 4 months ago

You need a better source of friends.

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 14 points 4 months ago

One Battle After Another

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hate me if you like but as someone generally pretty disinterested in going to the movies I'll check this new one out. First time going to see a film in cinemar since a screening of baraka a few years back.

It just seems like most films made don't really justify the expense and hassle of a theatre. Sure it's slop but it's beautiful slop, as opposed to fascist capeshit and artistically empty dramas that make up most of what seems to come out in the mainstream.

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

One of James Cameron's smarter ideas about Avatar is its shit unless you watch it on the biggest screen possible. Its why it makes "All of the money".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Carl@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

wasnt the thing with the pandarans that they had tails or were those ponytails

[–] towhee@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Ponytails, however the fire tribe cut theirs off. They might also have tails actually, I don’t remember

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

They do also have tails.

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

Pandarens mostly had top knots iirc

load more comments
view more: next ›