WhyEssEff

joined 5 years ago
MODERATOR OF
1
boil Netflix (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by WhyEssEff@hexbear.net to c/anime@hexbear.net
 

he made a 'release schedule' so trash dumpster-fire kiryu-pain even his binge watchers 'clowned' on him cruelty-desolate clown wowee

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago

took a bit of mental priming to open my zoomer-calibrated taste receptors to it but I am fucking with Bob Dylan

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

12 Sanguine Men, is this anything

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 47 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The GOATs of dysfunction, worst society of all-time contender? Hitlerite-Randian Nightmare Singularity with Theocratic and Futurist characteristics where every member fancies themselves The Ubermensch and Sole Ensouled Being and believes everyone around them to be Their Wretched Serfs put on earth for them to use. society of People Who Would Fail The Prisoner's Dilemma.

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

cars are gonna be the first to go but even though it’s irrational and probably a negligible cost on the priority queue of Things That Have To Go I hope smartphones and PCs become prohibitively expensive to choose to power for like at least a year so we can collectively be forcibly excised from the Eddingtonian diffuse unrealities

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

extremely controversial not for the faint of hearti really liked chainsaw mans ending

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I don't know if you want to spec into introductory quips for this crowd, unless you have like 5 seconds with each of them, which I think would be somewhat of a misguided approach anyways here.

Part of the thing with agitating in my experience—as well as having people hear you out in general—is you don't want to come off as an evangelist/salesman. The second someone hears you using stock lines, they tend to put their guard up or just entirely tune you out. They'll think you’re trying to sell them a bill of goods, which people are increasingly on guard about these days, as unapologetic scams and hustles gradually take over the American 'culture.'

To break the ice, the best thing you can do is just ask them a conversational, surface-level question that allows them to talk about their own experiences and beliefs (e.g. "so, what brings you out here?") Let them talk about themselves, and try to be a respectful-but-active listener when they're talking (e.g. "yeah, no, same here. I get it, yeah, he sucks. You do xyz for a living? I've heard a little bit about that, how's it treating you? Yeah, gas prices are wringing me dry, it's really bad, they said it was bad under Biden, but now, oof.) Essentially, try to be/seem genuinely interested in hearing about them as a person, and show that interest by actively responding to what they are sharing in a way that shows them that you view them as an equal and you are engaging with them genuinely.

If you absolutely have to steer the conversation (i.e. if it doesn't drift where you want it to after some time), try to naturally segue into your points with an innocuous hook (e.g. "you know, we're out here, all of us, but it's kind of hard to feel like we're accomplishing much with what we're doing here in particular") though try to employ this after a few turns at least so it isn't jarring.

It’s a similar mechanism to how people build community/network in general, the first and foremost goal should be to front your interest in connecting with them as a peer. It doesn't even have to be a deep/long conversation to get to the points you want to get to. You can get to explicit agitation in merely a couple conversational turns. You just open with something that immediately communicates your interest in them and their personal beliefs, which makes them in turn more interested in talking to you about why you're out here, and then you get to share about yourself and bring up some of the things you're thinking about that would allow you to naturally bring up your critiques. Because you've already shown good-faith interest in them and their beliefs, they'll be naturally more open to learning about you and your beliefs.

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 27 points 4 days ago

office space

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 22 points 5 days ago

It all returns to nothing, it all comes tumbling down tumbling down tumbling dooown econony

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

reaching the line, don't you turn back now, we're going west to east, to fight the Steel Ball Run, yeah torture-dance

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

His defense was like "China imprisons those that speak out against the government, this is an Indisputable Fact, Muslims can’t have beards there, this is an Indisputable Fact" and I was just like, Is It? How So?

real it-is-known hours. Also said it's "not a complicated situation, unlike Gaza, it's indisputably genocide" which khamenei-what

The Reform Zionist Industrial Complex creates yet another loyal soldier. makes me wonder how I even got out of the Birthright Indoctrination Pipeline when my peers are latched onto it three years into the unashamed and open bloodthirst and barbarism following Al-Aqsa Flood pain

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Zhou EnlaiHonestly, though, I might have just convinced myself of something deeper, Gatsby-style. I dunno. I don't know how you come out of TT shit without some resentment towards the people who let you get shipped off to the wilderness.

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

does anyone have any lib-friendly things that I can cite regarding the dubiousness of Xinjiang because I naïvely talked about wanting to visit China and he lowkey chastised me due to the Big Zenz (got linked a BBC article and a random youtuber). I think he has the capacity to be critical like I was because I can kinda sense the same contradiction that collapsed in me and got me on the path to socialism (albeit offset by a greater proximity to power), but I'm not at the level of comfort with that idea where I can start linking Grayzone to him.

 

source. looking for a translation of the announcement so I can add it as alt text/body text, preferably non-MTL. as for now, via Google Translate:

Statement issued by the Islamic Resistance (1):

Military Media of the Islamic Resistance

In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

And permission has been given to those who are being fought, because they were wronged. And indeed, God is fully capable of giving them victory.

God Almighty has spoken the truth

In revenge for the pure blood of the Supreme Leader of the Muslims, His Eminence Grand Ayatollah Imam Sayyid Ali al-Husseini al-Khamenei, may his soul rest in peace, which was unjustly and treacherously shed by the criminal Zionist enemy, and in defense of Lebanon and its people, and as part of the response to the repeated Israeli attacks, the Islamic Resistance targeted, at midnight between Sunday and Monday, March 2, 2026, with a barrage of advanced missiles and a swarm of drones, the Mishmar al-Karmel missile defense site belonging to the Israeli enemy army south of the occupied city of Haifa. The Resistance leadership has always affirmed that the continuation of Israeli attacks and the assassination of our leaders, youth, and people gives us the right to defend ourselves and respond at the appropriate time and place.

The Israeli enemy cannot continue its aggression, which has lasted for fifteen months, without receiving a warning response to stop this aggression and withdraw from the occupied Lebanese territories.

This response is a legitimate defensive response, and those responsible and concerned must put an end to the Israeli-American aggression against Lebanon

And victory comes only from God, the Almighty, the Wise.

Monday, March 2, 2026

212 Ramadan 1447

15
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by WhyEssEff@hexbear.net to c/badposting@hexbear.net
 

Operation Epstein's Fury

 

Since a lot of miscellaneous online accounts are reacting glibly to the idea that states like California and Colorado could force Linux to bake forced age verification into the kernel, my instinctual response is to a) disregard the opinions of smug computer guys because they're usually libertarians and b) consider which vectors these laws will actually be enforced through. There is a clear sweeping effort to implement these policies, so I assume the effect will be somehow tangible.

Since I'm doing self-study for IT certs at the moment, I’ll list out all the ways I can think of off the top of my head, though some, if not most, will be overcomplicated/inefficient. Disclaimer that I am only doing some investigating here and relying on my prior experience/knowledge otherwise (reason: eepy) so do not take this as anything definitive/inherently correct. I'll try to skip over the ones that have the same vector of implementation/execution (I.E. where are they enforced through?)

  • Client-side:
    • via hardware/manufacturers - controls on boot loaders via boot-restriction mandates, so that commercial laptops and desktops sold in the US are required to ship with UEFI firmware that refuses to boot un-American operating systems.
    • via OS distributors - operating systems/distributions made by companies operating in the US are required to integrate age verification protocols into their onboarding experience in order to continue operating/doing business in the US, or in order to avoid fines. Microsoft, Apple and Google would probably already be on board with this from the jump, so what's a few rankled Linux distro maintainers going to do? Not comply? Time to pack your shit and move, then! Now you can't access the consumption core as a market anymore. Sucks to suck!
    • via browsers - Browser controls. This is how it could transmit your information reliably to web servers. Google is based in the US, Mozilla is based in the US, Apple is based in the US. Chrome (plus all US-based Chromium forks), Firefox and Safari now ship with a process that verifies you have a digital ID registered on your device, prompts you to register one if you don't, and locks you out until you do.
  • Server-side:
    • via websites/applications - All social media (or even all sites/apps) operating out of the US are legally required to validate against a digital ID protocol baked into your operating system, routed in via your Freedom-Compliant Browser as a mandatory fingerprint that you can't not expose. If the digital ID is determined to be not present, either through subversion or non-compliant software, you cannot access the site. This would probably be selectively enforced w/ regards to penalizing the sites themselves, because otherwise Silicon Valley throws a tantrum, but it would force your browser to expose your age at best and your identification hash (or however they would decide to implement the protocol such that you are a traceable entity) at worst.
  • Social enforcement:
    • on an individual level - Even if it's not 'truly enforceable' if you find a hack that lets you bypass it because you know how your device works, it could be used as a charge-stacking/pinning vector for dissidents, call it Digital Identity Fraud.
    • on a corporate level - Most of them will pre-comply, but if they don't, just declare their products non-compliant with the law and treat them accordingly, killing their legitimate revenue and forcing all non-compliant systems underground so laymen decide it's not worth the trouble of navigating even if it's better for them, like piracy

Ultimately this is just me theorizing with my limited half-finished A+ cert study knowledge and general tech understanding, but I tried to engage the thought experiment on how this could be turned into something tangible as best I can.

I'd like to turn this over to people who might know more than me here. Is my idea of how this might be implemented (if done competently) consistent with the underlying tech, or am I misunderstanding some things? What other vectors might be used here? If these new bills pass, does anything change for us? What could our approach be individually/as a site/as a movement? What behavioral changes should we implement with regard to our internet usage as precaution? Would appreciate answers to any of these bits, even individually. Thus far the only approach that I can think of on 5 hours of sleep is the correct approach and has always been the correct approach and that is to logout but I'm curious if and how we can struggle against the furthering of the panopticon as targets of it.

 

…sorry, this isn’t an open forum. We actually had a secret vote without you on the secret committee that you aren’t a part of within the secret vanguard you don’t know about and we decided that it means Greatest Of Our Discourse. you snooze you lose. I declare demcent. i declare Party line. Get utterly owned. you’re a deviationist now.

 

whistleblower for the ministry of "well both sides have a point" confirms the sky is not red and is actually blue after year-long campaign to convince voters it doesn't really matter and we don't need to look into it

 

merchant class seizes power and starts a Wario Land timer on life as they exponentially delete the biosphere. you have half a millennia to install a DOTP before your planet is razed. the most dice roll bottleneck fathomable. if there are dead aliens and they developed like us we gotta one-up them quick gamers

mystery-emote moon
dafoe-horror

 

i enjoyed this Consumption Experience, it was Meaningful

 

haha just kidding… unless?~~(if they offer the Marxism program in English like some of their other tracks I would legitimately have a hard time convincing myself why I shouldn't go for it)~~

 

actually never mind… that's too long… that's a while… too far away basil-anxious-smile

96
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by WhyEssEff@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
 

Don't know if what I'm feeling is grounded in reality since I just had a particularly productive therapy session but I think I was feeling this beforehand too when I was scrolling this morning.

From what I'm seeing in the shift in posture, Stephen Miller blew his load and I assume Capital is getting antsy and is trying to cut off the Infinite Vice-Signal Machine. In a dark way, Alex Pretti was the perfect victim for the American public, and his execution was so blatantly appalling that it seems that that, alongside the general strike, is shocking the bourgeoisie into realignment with social liberalism for the first time since 2025's "mandate".

If it is the case that the leash is being pulled, expect to see the internal contradictions between the accelerationist cadre (ICE, Miller, Noem, Bovino, Thiel) and the thermostatics (Trump, Cruz, Vance) start to heighten. (EDIT: it, at least rhetorically, begins) The state-integrated Proud Boys and Oathkeepers on the ground are going to try to hit the gas on the tension pedal now that the leash for Unlimited GTA LARP might be tugged. They want to provoke the race war as much as they possibly can before the party ends. Miller, if competent, will take an L, fall into the background, and bide his time until we approach US midterms for another ramping up of domestic repression. They seem to want to make Noem and/or Bovino the fall guys for this, though I'd laugh if they somehow take Miller down with them.

If you are in the USA and my vibe meter holds (meaning the admin takes the L on this and retreats), you should be operating as if this is an armistice that will last, reasonably, at most until midterm elections. Even if they fold on their aura-farming about 'canceling the elections', treat it like they won't and immediately seek to organize with cool people within your area. gather the tools, strategies and general means to defend against and disrupt militant repression.

If I'm wrong (the admin doubles down), then we are truly in the Decades Week, agitate as much as possible to the laymen and rally for shows of worker power, as well as linking up with your local socialists and workers, of course. The former path's goals are worthwhile too if you and your comrades can muster them in time.

The best time to get offline and talk to the people in your area was when you first gained political consciousness. The second best time is now.

 

I’m granting the Seattle Polyweb charge of the PNW's mass-line infrastructure

view more: next ›