Reverse image search exists regardless of signature or exif data. Not saying people shouldn't post their art, just be aware that someone can track it to socials if even if you scrub it and don't mention your name.
thefunkycomitatus
Guy who starts crying when someone jokingly says he's invited to the cookout. Guy who got a dap once and made it his whole personality. Guy who took private AAVE classes. Guy who made Chet Hanks self conscious about cultural appropriation.

A 250 year old empire hastily enters conflict with Iran. This is what happened to its body politic...
This sounds exactly like a group for people with problematic tweets from 2014. 0% chance this group wasn't started by a standup comedian who was complaining about Trump and then everyone found old clips of racial slurs from like 2012.
Naturalist who enjoys hiking dropped off several packages at rural post office on a breezy summer day.
MineWrath

I was more referring to the dual slit experiment because it's such a simple thing that anyone can do at home and is about very abstract theoretical physics but is tangible and comprehensible (mostly). My post was more trying to point out that geology seems more GROUNDED than theoretical physics but all science isn't experimental and empiricism isn't everything. I also wrote that post at like 4 am so I may have worded it very poorly. I'm more commenting on the idea that there is known experimental science versus unknown theoretical science, where something like chemistry or geology is the former and wacky particle physics is the latter. It's not a dichotomy. Other people answered the specific question so I was addressing something I saw that nobody commented on.
Carefully constructed models on what should exist, and how those things should behave if they exist, then experiments that show these things behaving as predicted, therefore validating the model. It's an inductive process like dialectics. You move between theory and praxis, updating theory and adjusting action. Though this kind of paints a picture that all science is experimental when it's not and yet is equally valid. Like lots of stuff in geology can't be observed directly due to time scales or ran as a experiment. In a way there's more experimental data supporting the wave-particle duality of light than experiments supporting plate tectonics. It becomes just thinking about stuff really hard, and looking at stuff very closely to make sure you're observing it the right way. Make predictions about what you should find next if you're correct.
spoiler
I mean there are measurements of ocean floor spread but that's less about testing the theory and more about seeing how fast or how much. It's not an experiment like someone constructing a clever inference device to understand the nature of a particle, all based entirely on models and theory.
The subject of how important media is to the cause, if media consumption is politically transformative, where media careerism fits into practical strategy, etc are all good questions worth exploring as a community. Media consumption is one of the biggest issues for leftists online (or online leftists?) and we never talk about from the outside. It's always something boiling under the surface of these spontaneous slap-fights. We should start having structured discussions on issues that so many seem to care about.
Since we live in a world where people can make a career out of presenting socialist ideas to the world, we should probably address how that fits into a socialist movement. I can understand the USSR not getting too in-depth about radio as mass media. They didn't conceptualize it that way because it hadn't turned into this reality-defining commodity that has been for the past few generations. Anyone trying to do movement building in 2026 needs to address it in a formal, rigorous way.
Doom-SLAY-er