haha bruh is so scared of going on the flotilla that he's actually going on the flotilla lmao bruh :skull:
thefunkycomitatus
Marx wrote about the nature of human production where we come to know things by making them and then those things change human society by becoming part of culture. How do you even examine humanity without considering production and culture are related? Fields like sociology are pretty good about acknowledging Marx. Not sure about anthropology though.
Where do you think the rich's war on food for poors ends? Is it a "decadence for me, branded influencer gruel for you" kind of thing or will these people slowly gaslight themselves into not eating food at all because it's too pedestrian? Food will be the iphone or the big screen TV, where the poors show no moral fortitude by debasing themselves in consumerism while the noble elites only eat food because they can afford it?
I'm writing in Hillary and none of you gavinbros can stop me.
Hey someone taking the discussion more seriously than you or caring about it more than you isn't a defect. We covered this during our revision of the CoC.
Do not demean or harass others for caring about a topic or details of a topic more than you do.
If you don't have anything constructive to contribute other than "people who reply to me are hyper online weirdos" then you should follow your own advice and log off.
The legacy of the 2015-era socialist podcasters will be the Roganization leftist media. Hope it was worth it just to dunk on Johnathan Chait with the r-slur or give the deeply materialist, dialectic commentary of Trump being gay. Still wondering where these noble normies that amassed around our normal podcasters are. Seems like after a decade of normalizing the left for normal sensibilities there should be something to show for it besides the personal wealth of the hosts. Maybe subscriber count is its own victory. Hey I went to a party of lefists and they knew what a podcast was, I guess we won in the end.
This gets on my nerves because literally everyone gets this wrong as nobody really knows or cares about the history of McDonald's architecture. Yet the argument relies on a historical narrative. This is not new. In the 70s they did this exact same thing. They got rid of the bright and flashy style they had used throughout the 50s and 60s. They used more earth tones and natural materials. Their goal was to make it feel more homey rather than oriented at kids/young people. Imagine going from white, red, yellow with space-age curves, almost Googie architecture, to beige and brown.

There is no woke architecture crisis. The difference is how we react to any change. It's all driven by social media outrage and flat-out manufactured bait. Every minor change anyone makes is amplified and blown up and added to some kind of culture war narrative instantly. Then it's repeated so much that even leftists will be like "this is true but because of dialectical materialism." It's not even true. Your 80s/90s McDonald's that you totally remember accurately was colorful because some franchises reverted back to white/yellow/red for the same reasons. People thought the 70s retool was too drab. Some were repainted. It's not a linear decline in aesthetics it, get this, changes over time. Something you like may come into style but then it will go out of style. It may come back into style again.
I know we are desperately grasping at any canary in a coal mine for the fall of capitalism, but I don't think it's correlated to the appearance of McDonald's.
-- The prison camp guard asked before mag-dumping into my brainpan.
Probably not the greatest time to have "Dick Epstein" write an article for your paper.
That was a Star Trek reference/easter egg in a random encounter which is officially non-canon.
Oh so they're finally doing a real Overwatch 2 after 3 years of battlepass money but ironically removing the 2.
SpudChud's cortisol levels SPIKED as he was tryina icemaxx during schoolcel hours because a leftoid soychad went aggro and fistmogged spudchud.