Just as a general thing if you're going to look at history, people don't really subscribe to beliefs like they're choices on a menu or because they fulfill some kind of checklist of beneficial properties. So no they don't all prefer fascism like someone prefers the new iphone. Fascism is a result of the bourgeoisie trying to maintain their status and wealth. Whether they want it or not, it happens. People in the 1930s weren't sitting around looking for a belief to fall into their lap. It emerged as a response to the historical moment.
thefunkycomitatus
this is so much bigger than Vietnam
some kind of war involving the whole world...

>it is 1807 and the enemy just sank the USS Chesapeake, the US decides to enter the war
>it is 1898 and the enemy just sank the USS Maine, the US decides to enter the war
>it is 1915 and the enemy just sank the USS Lusitania, the US decides to enter the war
>It is 1941 and the enemy just sank the USS Oklahoma, the US decides to enter the war
>it is 1964 and the enemy just attacked the USS Maddox (allegedly), the US decides to enter the war
>it is 2026 and the enemy just sank the USS Missouri, the US decides to enter the war
I have had it with these boat wars.
All those cheap Costco Iberian hams that feed the home-pro chef content on youtube are gone.
Dubai is really blowing up right now. So many opportunities on the ground floor. Something new launching everyday.
Really cool memes online about how badass the military is and for people to do the shining eyes thing to his official portrait and be like "Pete hogworth is frickin epic y'all dat boy comin"
It's not the x post that's the source, it's just the thing hosting the video. The video is the source. The video is from this network: https://www.canalcaribe.icrt.cu/
If you want an "Official" source: https://apnews.com/video/cuba-displays-military-hardware-seized-from-florida-flagged-boat-involved-in-firefight-with-troops-6149f23113aa455eb8cb63120aa20eb6
Pay no attention to the white hoodie, it is of no import and we shan't focus on trivial details.
I'm actually responding with the correct amount of levity, thank you. Blocking you now since you feel entitled to be involved in my posting decisions and seem to be operating under the assumption that I am somehow socially responsible to you in some way.
It's c/slop. If the site wants to seriously hash out this issue then why not make a serious dedicated thread and create an actual dialogue? Oh wait that's too productive. Let's just have serious discussions about twitter posts some more.
Oh yeah? Then why was I called a g*nji main.
The subject of how important media is to the cause, if media consumption is politically transformative, where media careerism fits into practical strategy, etc are all good questions worth exploring as a community. Media consumption is one of the biggest issues for leftists online (or online leftists?) and we never talk about from the outside. It's always something boiling under the surface of these spontaneous slap-fights. We should start having structured discussions on issues that so many seem to care about.
Since we live in a world where people can make a career out of presenting socialist ideas to the world, we should probably address how that fits into a socialist movement. I can understand the USSR not getting too in-depth about radio as mass media. They didn't conceptualize it that way because it hadn't turned into this reality-defining commodity that has been for the past few generations. Anyone trying to do movement building in 2026 needs to address it in a formal, rigorous way.