449
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Former President Donald Trump was fined $5,000 by a New York judge on Friday for violating a gag order not to speak about any members of the court staff – and was warned twice about possible imprisonment.

“Donald Trump has received ample warning from this Court as to the possible repercussions of violating the gag order. He specifically acknowledged that he understood and would abide by it,” Judge Arthur Engoron said in his order Friday.

“Accordingly, issuing yet another warning is not longer appropriate; this Court is way behind the ‘warning’ stage.”

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 98 points 11 months ago

See that, they fined a billionaire/millionaire $5k, he’s finally facing consequences for his actions. We got ‘em!

[-] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 45 points 11 months ago

I think that's the standard fine for the first offense. Plus, the violation was not removing something from his website that existed before the gag order, not something he did after.

The judges are following standard procedure so he can't appeal things when he is sent to jail.

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the sane response. It's frustrating watching the wheels slowly grinding

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago

I could pay that.

What the fuck.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

Ain't oligarchies fun?

[-] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Legal for a price!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 54 points 11 months ago

"Ok, don't do it again. We really, really mean it this time."

[-] Rusticus@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

In a sternly written letter

[-] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

That's it !?!

[-] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 37 points 11 months ago

Imagine if you got $5,000 every time Trump said something stupid.

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

How to solve world’s hunger in two easy steps; make the rich pay every time they say something stupid. The second step is the hardest; actually collect the money.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I wouldn't mind for all the fuck twits I have to listen to repeat his stupidity for the last decade

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

At least it wasn't just a warning, there was a fine attached, but that's like fining your average middle class person like 25 cents.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

Apparently it has to ratchet up, from "inconsequential" to imprisonment, specifically to show the courts increasing frustration.

Otherwise the defendant can claim bias

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

That’s Trump’s secret, though; he always claim bias.

[-] plantedworld@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

"would the defendant please put a quarter in the contempt jar"

[-] Finite@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Only if I could go out and ask my friends and family for the money so I didn't actually have to pay the $0.25.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A lot of complaining on here about the size of the fine or the fact that Trump isn't in jail yet, or disparate legal treatment for rich people. Let's think through the implications of putting Donald Trump in jail for this, of all things. If he gets put in jail prior to his trial, I think it'd be better for all of us, and for keeping him in jail, if it happens due to him willfully or maliciously violating a gag order rather than due to an oversight or incompetence among his staff. It's coming y'all, be patient.

[-] Treczoks@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago

I see the fine as both a warning and a lure for Trump. The court will step up the punishments, of that I am sure. And they started with a, for him, neglectable fine. He and his fanboys might laugh about this, but it could easily lead to prison for the next time he's fined - he now had ample warning from the court that he will be punished, and the next time it will be a repeat offence.

[-] nocturne213@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

If his staff is incompetent he should hire the best and the brightest, or do the work himself.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

He can no longer afford the best and brightest, and they’re too smart to accept “trust me, bro” as a guarantee of payment. Additionally, he’s not used to doing things himself; he’s used to having underlings do things for him.

The only people who will work for him now are sycophants and/or people who are motivated by some sort of personal gain. In other words, he’s surrounded by incompetent, greedy losers. Heh heh heh.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

What? Donald Trump doesn't know how to operate a website, and few competent people are willing to work for him. None of this changes my argument that if a former president is put in jail, let's have it be because he did something willfull or malicious

[-] paper_clip@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

Donald Trump doesn’t know how to operate a website

"Someone told me I need pipes for the website. We need to get the best pipes. Do they come in gold plate?"

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 6 points 11 months ago

If they're avoiding this hard to put him in jail what makes you think he'll ever get a guilty verdict. All this dancing around makes me believe he'll never be convicted, or at most it will be a slap on the wrist.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

How are they "avoiding hard," in this instance?

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

$5000 is a typical fine for first-time violation of a gag order. They are neither avoiding putting him in jail nor eager to put him in jail.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

How is standard procedure "avoiding hard"?

They have to play it perfect so trump cannot appeal based on bias or mistreatment

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Aaaaaaaany day now.

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

$5,000? Wow, really bringing out the big guns here aren't we. That'll show him, I'm sure!

[-] Steve@startrek.website 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Another nickel, just a cost of doing business.

[-] livedeified@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

I'm pessimistic enough to think this is an example of what his punishment will be for just about all his crimes.

[-] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Is the judge Gary Bettman?

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

That fine is nothing to him.

Fines are only punishments if you are poor.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
449 points (97.7% liked)

News

22962 readers
3851 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS