this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
672 points (97.1% liked)

science

26515 readers
146 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 28 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Also FYI: if you are getting enough calories, you are almost certainly also getting enough protein. The RDA for protein is quite low, 0.8g per kg bodyweight, or about 10% of your caloric intake. You can meet this by eating just grains. However, as mentioned in the linked source, the RDA is intended to prevent nutrient deficiencies, not provide an optimal level of intake.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yes. You don't need to exceed protein requirements to be healthy.

You do need to exceed protein requirements if you're trying to build muscle as fast as possible, which is what this article is about

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

To gain muscle you should be eating 1-1.4 grams of protein bet lb of bodyweight

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The mix of metric and fantasy units is quite infuriating

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

On the face of it, yeah. But since we are talking about a ratio of nutrient to body weight, there's no inherent benefit besides ideological purity to using the same units for both sides of the ratio.

In the states, nutritional info is universally listed in grams, and bodyweight is most commonly measured in pounds, so in that context g/lb is a perfectly logical way to describe recommended intake levels.

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] dmention7@midwest.social 5 points 5 months ago

...as I explicitly stated in my comment?

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ah nooo converting units is so difficult for my widdle iddy biddy brain pwease stawwp im gonna pooooo

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's a rather excessive amount unless you mean g protein/kg instead of g protein / lbs

People who exercise regularly also have higher needs, about 1.1-1.5 grams per kilogram. People who regularly lift weights or are training for a running or cycling event need 1.2-1.7 grams per kilogram. Excessive protein intake would be more than 2 grams per kilogram of body weight each day.

https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speaking-of-health/are-you-getting-too-much-protein

2g / kg = ~0.9g /lbs for reference

[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

iirc 1.5g per kg of body mass is enough above that you get diminishing returns fast

[–] vin@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Rice does come up a bit short by my calculations, if you are just meeting your caloric intake needs. Oats provide more than enough, though.