Completely uncalled for bio-essentialism.
Chapotraphouse
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
It begs the question: how do you even know the gender of an author? If we did the Pepsi challenge with a bunch of short stories and had people guess who wrote them, how accurate would those guesses even be?
There is probably something to literature being gendered. But claiming this is due to biology is hella weird.
This would seem to me incredibly difficult to prove or quantify in any meaningful way. Further complicated by the existence of editors.
There has to be market research in the publishing industry for stuff like that.
Presumably, but the publishing industry helps build the norms around what counts as "female literature" and "male literature" and how both are marketed/sold, so it would be pretty limited in terms of insight.
also make sure the participants have no idea the authors have different genders, or that the study is about genders, and also
I have known multiple people who refused to believe American Psycho was directed by a woman even though she's in the opening title credits
Jakkkobin
im guessing only a man would write this which is weird because i dont enjoy this
I push back. I've seen women IRL who love to talk about bio-essentialism like its the core of their personality.
I assert that it's a gender neutral genre of loser.
Yep. I almost feel like saying a man must have written this is giving the argument too much credit because, with the exception of hilarious anatomical errors, virtually any author could use a pseudonym from the opposite gender and no one would think to guess that without being clued in first.
Yep my mom could have written this -_-
Your biological reality must not be sticky enough, time to refill your gender fluid /s
It's true, though. Just the other day I decided to give this female author a shot and immediately noticed the lack of penis at which point I had to stop reading.
I tried to watch one of my sexy time adult movies and saw that the director was a FEMALE and I was devastated 
I know the feeling, comrade. I too don't want a female anywhere near my adult movie experiences.
If you just presuppose that sexism naturally must exist, then I guess sexism is real and valid 
Female writing carries pheromones that deter male readers from engaging 
There are sticky biological realities that do exist, like the slimy prion-laden ooze the average western journalist uses instead of a brain, but the fact that i prefer artistic works by women
Spoiler
or by totally not eggy indie creators who just happen to be able to write extremely compelling yuri for no reason at all
I hate it when the words on the page are written womenly.
i only wear underwear designed and woven by the minds and hands of men.
this is how i maintain my man power.
I've lost track of the horrible trash that Jackoffbin has published. there was a really bad one recently
if only Harper Lee had described Atticus Finch as “a bear of a man” she could got gotten somewhere with her little writing hobby.
editors note: the author of this article thought Harper Lee was a man because 'a Harper is a job, right? like the kind of thing only men have?'
it's just basic biology folks. words on a page are clearly manly or womanly and its obvious to anyone which words are which by who wrote them.
Books written by men are shaped in such a way that they can be cradled by the penis while reading, for maximum comfort. Books written by women have no regard for penis ergonomics and as such are a physically unpleasant reading experience.
When did Jordan Peterson join Jacobin's writing staff
Another chaucobinism? 
What year is it?? Can you link the article I wanna share?
I only read authors with initialised names so I can't be biased by knowing their gender like JG Ballard, R L Stine, JK Rowling
Purely anecdotal evidence, but I work in a bookshop and this is largely true, most fiction readers are disproportionately buying books written by a member of their gender marketed at their gender. The people buying the classics seem to do this less (especially women reading famous hundred year old books by male authors) though both genders are still more likely to buy classic authors of their gender.
Imo this will continue for a very long time until we live in a very different society and gender divisions fall away much more.
well that's socialized behavior, not "biological reality"
they seem to imply people are just intrinsically much less likely to enjoy the contents of literature from the opposite-gender, which is ridiculous considering how many men have historically raved over books written by women only because they *thought* they were written by men (but were actually women using male pseudonyms)
Jacobin just made an assertion and left it at that - idk
They also frame it as biological rather than social. It would clearly be a social phenomenon.
It might be largely true as a function of marketing. In my case it isn't really.
The original Jacobins would never have been that reductive. We’re all equal before the guillotine

Gay Italian communist cowboys please


JaKKKobin, the DemSoc rag, strikes again!
Can anyone tell me if Luke Savage writes horseshit like this? I cringe a bit when they bring up that he writes for Jacobin on Michael & Us like it demonstrates his credentials, but I've never read any of his articles on there.
I hate it when sister kim turns out to be a korean man.
can someone recommend a good penis book that i can gift my father?