WhatDoYouMeanPodcast

joined 5 years ago
MODERATOR OF

Stop, Anakin. You're hurting me

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I would also argue that making the older games easily accessible doesn't even get in the way of making money. Give away FRLG just like they do in the sites. Fuck, it. If you're brave, put the ROM on your website. Like if I'm a little kid who likes to play in the dort and I get my grubby little hands on a solid, simple entry in the pokemon series, then suddenly AI slop and mobile games feels hollow in comparison. I want to get into the paid versions. Once I have disposable income do you think I want Minecraft toys?! No! I want a Pikachu plushie. I want to fly to watch VGC and I use the hotel you partnered with and you got some revenue by attracting a larger crowd filled with people who preferred Pokemon compared to F2P mobile shit.

Being a cool company with a good product feels like it would be a competitive advantage. Especially if everyone else is a shitty fucking vampire 24/7

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

In theory they're both pretax dollars with the HSA giving you the option of spending it on important things before retirement. That capacity to spend without penalty is the difference.

This is financial advice — Bitcoin has LITERALLY no option but to go to the moon TOMORROW! Don't be a SCHMUCK or you'll be rolling around in the dort with the owls

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Bit idea: If you didn't produce the good or service yourself you didn't really earn the money. Contracts are basically a crutch for weaker players to get power leveled by smarter, stronger, and more honest players. You should ask wealthy people if they have real wealth or fake, inflated contract wealth. If they justify rent seeking or exploitation you just make disappointed, consternated faces at them - perhaps even muttering "ew..." Police force enforcing property rights are like summons in Elden Ring.

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, if you're given meds in isolation without probing into what's wrong then you have my condolences. But the comparison to a boss battle, like it's supposed to be an arduous task, is an artifact of how tasks are structured in games and education. Your anxiety might come from crowds, but if you tank some fatigue and headache from consuming less caffeine combined with anxiety meds and you can tolerate it for a while then gg.

If it has to do with trauma, you might have a harder time in stabilizing yourself, but it might involve the affirming process of finding community with whom you overcome. And finding people who you fw isn't really a dodge or die boss battle.

I like watching snowflake ironman accounts on YouTube. I even played Old School RuneScape with a few ironman types for a while. Basically, you choose to limit yourself in funny ways. "I can only use what I acquire from sailing" or "I technically have a way to get 8k smithing experience an hour, so I must get 13m experience before I do anything else." Watching them limit themselves helped me overcome that kind of complex and really enjoy the freedom to choose whichever grind I find compelling that day anywhere on the map.

The point being that if I don't think I'm going to discuss the game or if I'm doing my first casual playthrough then I want to see whether I like the game enough to play it again to even entertain putting extra constraints on myself. So if I don't really enjoy the process of having anxiety, why the fuck would I choose to limit myself in the process of overcoming it? The only good reasons are things like adverse health effects, dialing in dosages and options, and complications to that effect.

Honestly, I get it. Cause I just don't see them ever going

"Oh no, I got Katy Perry pregnant! I'm such a silly goose!"

Or

"Yikes! I'm having Justin Trudeau's child?! Is he ready for that responsibility?"

I just really think they could handle that

C'mon! Lucky one time! nope

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

Unc is about to get Kennedy'd

So you just have this good information and you're keeping it to yourself instead of assisting the goblin union? That's kinda fr*cked up

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

My red flags in a tank

  1. low base HP (maybe not always but see #2)

  2. can't mitigate damage well

  3. can't hold threat

  4. no AoE threat/taunt

  5. no "oh shit" buttons

  6. no stuns

  7. gear below the threshold of the content

Those are my take it or leave its before I even invite them to the raid

Back in my day we used to just eat vitamins for health. Now, thanks to woke, we have to have minerals too.

 

FUCK

 

The song is viciously stuck in my head and I want to find the meme that's responsible for it.

 

haha just kidding… unless?~~(if they offer the racism program to non-fascists unlike any of their other tracks I would legitimately have a hard time convincing myself why I should go for it)~~

 

alphys-anxious : whisper whisper whisper

Wait, what?

alphys-anxious : whisper whisper whisper

But yeah, obviously that's bad

alphys-anxious : whisper whisper whisper

What are you talking about? It's clearly a group of people who are doing a bad thing. It's not because they-

alphys-anxious : whisper whisper whisper

What the FUCK?

 

Badpost or Games post? You decide by texting your vote to +44444444444

 

I'll be damned if my fucking bad posts get outbadded by sincere takes.

If you know what you're worth, go and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers... saying you ain't where you wanna be because of him or her or anybody! Cowards do that, and that ain't you! You're better than that!

 

My lawyer recommended I did not post this in the first place, but has since wrestled me away from the computer once I told them I was going to finish the joke anyway.

 

The Ultimate Self Defense Championship is an interesting piece of YouTube slop that has me looking at an Israeli UFC fighter's twitter post. There was a guy, Rokas, who went viral because he spent a long time being an Aikido student and instructor only to fight an MMA fighter and realize that he didn't know the first thing about combat (sports). So he spends years learning MMA, BJJ, boxing, and the like to come back and have some sparring with the same guy. Rokas grew up bullied in Lithuania, so being able to fend off attackers was really valuable to him.

He ends up making this game with his friends where he puts himself and them in these self defense challenges like "what if you have 25 seconds in a cage with someone with a knife?" and "what if you have someone else with you?" and "what if your boss is being weird?" He eventually gets got in training (I think someone hits him with a Kani Basami and all the screws and springs in his leg fly out) and becomes the manager for the thing instead of a participant. Each year he ups the production quality and the scenarios get more elaborate. They're currently in the middle of season 3.

Interestingly, one of the recurring characters is ex-UFC fighter Natan Levy. He's an Israeli which, you know... is not exactly our favorite customer. He wears a star of David on his rash guard. People I liked watching were okay being around him and he sticks around. However foolishly of me, and feel free to tell me how foolishly, it made me want to understand him instead of just calling him an Israeli. I dig a little bit trying to see if I can get a quote from him. His whole thing is his distaste for antisemitism. Notably, I can't find a quote from him conflating antizionism with antisemitism. He teaches Jews self defense, but notably he says they're welcoming to anyone who feels bullied. He cares about community, self-esteem, and not being victims. At most he says "antisemitism is on the rise after October 7th." This is, of course, true and easy to have happen when you have the greater Satan state apparatus doing that antizionism conflation as their only messaging and using legal channels to express it.

Then I find the core I was looking for. Khamzat Chimaev, motherfucker wrestler from hell (positive) and current Middleweight champion of the UFC, is talking about Israel. He has deep ties to the Chechen Republic. He is perhaps more entangled than he is a willing participant, but that's speculation and navel gazing. He's a devout Muslim and famous for his personality softening after becoming a father. The point is, he's on Instagram and he goes "You are just guests of Palestine, respect them for giving you asylum, one day you will be expelled from Palestine inshaallah. Give me the strongest man from Israel, I will break him." Again, would love to see either of those things in the wake of a genocide. Natan Levy replies to him.

Natan Levy's replyKhamzat, If you have a problem with me or my people, I'm very easy to find. One phone call to Dana White (Hexbear note: CEO+President of the UFC/match maker of which they are both part of at the time) is all it takes.

Now let me educate you: WE ARE NOT GUESTS, WE ARE HOME

Jews and Palestinians have ties to the land, Israel's population is 20% muslims; most identify as Arab or Palestinian by nationality and Israeli by citizenship, They are equal citizens, are Doctors, Lawyers, Judges, serve in the government and even the military.

Both Israelis and Palestinians want to be treated with dignity and humanity. We both want the world to recognize our ties to our homeland where we have lived in for thousands of years.

We are willing to share the land and we have, but we will never leave it!

Palestinian leadership has declined at least seven offers to split the land between Jews and Arabs in exchange for peace. Israel even withdrew from the Gaza Strip as a peace offering in 2005 but now rockets are launched from there at our homes.

Their leaders would rather keep the people in pain while they hold onto money and power. Palestinian Authority hasn't held elections in almost two decades. You are a mouthpiece for these corrupt leaders.

Your hateful statements do nothing but intensify the conflict and tear us further apart.

Now, I don't agree with him about the equal citizenship of Muslims in Israel. I wouldn't agree with him about how the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict came to pass. And admittedly I'm not one to speak authoritatively about how the Palestinian Authority has acted. Though I've come to understand events like Hamas being willing to dissolve in exchange for peace, broken peace treaties, and, you know, Israel using... less than safe and expeditious strategy for getting hostages/POWs returned from an illegally occupied territory & open air prison.

But if I grew up in Israel and I understood history as he did, I can imagine seeing the world as he does. If he has expressed anything across his body of work and statements, it's that he does want people to be treated with dignity and humanity, something we can all agree on. Rockets bad, something we can all agree on. If you're American, I imagine you know what it's like to have a bloodthirsty leader who wants more bloodshed and pain. And, as a stupid asshole half way across the world, it's not really my place if I saw a 1 state solution where it's decidedly not an ethnostate, to encourage people to struggle for more. A free Palestine and an equal Israel (10000000000% more likely to just be on paper just and covertly awful, but if not) would theoretically be a healthy society.

Now, if I go to Natan's Wikipedia page and ctrl+F "idf" or "israeli defense" I get 0 pings. The only ping I get on Google is that Etay Levy served for 3 years and didn't like it; thank you very much for being stupid and useless, AI. So to what extent I'm seeing what I'm meant to see I don't know.

I don't think Natan Levy is a virulent anti-Palestinian monster. To a large extent he seems informed by his circumstances, but aren't we all? I don't believe I have his full story, but nothing is screaming to me that he wants more carnage or believes in a supremacist future. I think his understanding of the Arab-Israeli conflict is ahistorical and dangerous, but his understanding of our shared humanity would likely see me giving him the benefit of the doubt. Thoughts?

 

We could LARP and eat tavern food.

To me, leftist infighting is just infighting. That's just a small taste of my lefted up brain

view more: next ›