this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
128 points (97.8% liked)

politics

30365 readers
1568 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sure that McConnell was a great listener that day.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 83 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Did he, you know, say anything back?

Assholes.

[–] Philippe23@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"spoken to" not "spoken with".

load more comments (3 replies)

My guess is that his aides used AI to replicate his voice.

[–] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Spoken to?

Spoken with?

More like spoken at.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Herman Cain.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh sure, the candles flickered and the ouija board spelled out "I hate poor people" so we're pretty sure it was him.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 days ago

But that could be any rich old white politician...

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nope. He has been declared brain dead.

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Since like 1985, yeah. Any recent news?!?

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The "Joe Biden is an empty suit" people sure don't seem to mind empty suits when they're members of the GOP. Curious.

[–] ContactClosure@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago

Stop wasting your time pointing out their hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is the whole point. They know. We know.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doin everything they can to avoid that special election.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The special election isnt what worries them, it's the opposite. Unless McConnell "stays alive" until the first week of August, the Kentucky Governor (D) can appoint a replacement. If he dies "after" that date, a special election can be triggered, which the Republicans are a lot more confident they can rig.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Actually, Kentucky is a special case, as the heavily Republican legislature passed a law (over the Democratic Governor's veto) specifically removing the right of the Governor to pick a replacement. Now, in the case of any vacancy, the Governor's only role is to schedule the special election.

But, if it's too close to the General Election, then the governor is obligated to fold the special election in with the General. The current theory on the Internet is that Republicans are stringing this out so that happens, because they are afraid if there is a special election then Thomas Massie would win it.

After some thought, that seems unlikely to me. Even if a special election is held, it would only be for the remainder of McConnell's term, which is up at the end of the year. So, that would mean that Republicans are more comfortable leaving the seat vacant (and reducing their majority) for a few more months rather than risk Massie getting the job for a few months. (And although Massie is an anti-Trumper, he is still a Republican, and will likely be a reliable vote on all sorts of evil shit for them)

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's even more complicated than that. You're right that the legislature passed that law but the original one (that the governor named a replacement) is still in the state constitution. They're two literally irreconcilable laws and either scenario would have to be litigated

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think it's law first until it's challenged. So they'll do the state election and then the challenge can play out, likely for next time because removing an elected official is a minefield.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The heart monitor isn't Morse code

[–] Ariselas@piefed.ca 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He keeps saying " E E E E E E E " what does it mean?

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 15 points 3 days ago
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 3 days ago

We don't believe you.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

Mitch?? Mitch???

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Barrasso spokesperson Kate Noyes said the two discussed a number of topics, including recent sexual assault allegations against Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner (allegations Platner has denied) and national defense spending, during a 20-minute phone conversation on Tuesday afternoon.

Billionaires that own American media really want the anti-genocide progressive to drop out...

They're shoehorning it into everything these days, and apparently even McConnell is focused on stopping Platner.

[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd just also like to call out that Republicans are using McConnell's warm corpse as a campaign billboard and that is weirdly hilarious.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The highlight for me was his wife immediately hoping on a jet to Bejing to meet with Chinese officials days after he had to be revived with CPR in their home.

Married for 30+ years and she immediately went as far away as she could without leaving the fucking planet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Republican leaders have zero credibility

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 9 points 3 days ago

Only the good die young.

"Senate republican leaders say that they've spoken to Mitch McConnell remains" FIFY

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

And the evidentiary value of those assertions is diddly-squat.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago
[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Then again with AI videos now, it's not worth much..

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Even if they did, I think no public contact is a fair reason to replace him

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)

Did he speak back? Did he seem lucid or aware? Can you confirm it was him? Are you prepared to swear to these facts under oath?

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

Hold on, I gotta speak to this brick on this wall...one sec....yeah he's still a brick.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I say shelack the corpse, wheel it into his normal chair at congress and let it keep working. Its not any crazier than any of the other things congress is doing.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

"to" or "at"?

[–] jared@mander.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

Weekend at McConnell's.

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

L-l-l-l-l-iars! We have reached peak Republican when they have to keep a corpse on life support to avoid losing another special election.

[–] Ariselas@piefed.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Is Mitch McConnell in the room with us right now?

load more comments
view more: next ›