this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
128 points (97.8% liked)

politics

30365 readers
1535 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sure that McConnell was a great listener that day.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Then again with AI videos now, it's not worth much..

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I sincerely doubt that anyone lying for the conservative party has the wherewithal to create a convincing AI video of Mitch McConnell.

Thinking about; no it shouldn't be that difficult to create an AI video of a man with 1000's of hours in footage of him publically available. I still don't think this admin could pull it off.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'll take " things that are simultaneously terrifying and reassuring" for 200, Alex

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Sorry, it wasn't my intent to do either — I am anticipating their usage of AI for something; I just don't see it being something like this. These circumstances are much more easily obfuscated through things like HIPAA/ privacy demands/ his wife leaving for China while having power of attorney (if there isn't a foreign espionage case there I don't know what to say). Why risk a spurring on a legitimate conversation by falsifying easily disproved evidence? Why not wait and try to do that as like some last ditch effort to wring a couple more days out?

I would be more suspicious of pictures or edited videos on other topics. Like, unironically some Stalin-esque 'delete people from pictures' stuff. Not necessarily on the same level as Stalin, I don't think it's possible to totally delete people from the current information ecosystem. I do think it's absolutely possible to take real govt footage, like the footage from aircraft thermal optics, edit that a little bit; boom, aliens. Or say, real pictures of Epstein and the other pedophile elite; seems like a good way to legitimize Trump while demonizing his enemies.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Fair (and well articulated) point..

Curious to hear your opinion, what do you think their end game is with pretending that McConnell isn't dead?