kryptonianCodeMonkey

joined 2 years ago

Oh, I very much doubt that. They're counting on the federal goverment as a "backstop" to their over extended debts when the bill comes due (several orders of magnitude over extended, mind you. More than a trillion over extended.). They're gonna play mouth service for the public, but give Bitch Baby Trump whatever it takes to keep that backstop secured and reep all the benefits of their beings unrealistic gamble and none of the financial consequences.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I.. did not... inhale.

That's... not what I asked you, Bill.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Even if it were true that China stole the election, how is "something happened 6 years ago" an emergency? He won in 2024, so it can't be that effective anymore.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And... the other 10?

The hard plastic ones tend to hurt my ears

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm really not even a little bit following what you're trying to say. What units are you using? What does the Sagittarius A* have to do with anything? What scale factor are you talking about? Mass? Volume? "Mass of electron cloud equivalent to black hole" what electron cloud? Where are you pulling these numbers?

Mass isn't what determines if a singularity forms. Density is. Enough mass has to be formed in small enough volume to form a singularity. Mass more most matter would have to multiply by many many orders of magnitude for a planet to form one. Adding a single election to each atom doesn't do that.

Maybe charge can play a factor, but I don't really have any idea how exactly or how significant it is.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

In the example in from that what if, they are putting a universe's worth of mass in the volume of the moon, so it would create a super massive singularity. That's not what is happening in here.

If every atom suddenly gained an electron, they would indeed increase in mass. But a hydrogen atoms would gain the most relative mass as it is the lightest atom, and that would only be an increase of 1/1837th of its total mass now, so... not that much. Masses of heavier atoms and the macro level matter made from them would increase in mass even more marginally. It would be a negligible difference, definitely not be enough for a singularity to form from this increase alone unless a star's core were already riding that edge.

So their original determination would still be correct, that molecules would fly apart (atomized) and explode outward into the vacuum of space. Now, maaaaybe if the explosive force were enough to cause atoms to collide in space and at relativistic speeds, tiny singularities might form. But their combined negative charge would be far more powerful than their gravitational pull, and they would decay almost immediately, so... no crunch.

Grain of salt: I love physics, but I'm not a physicist.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Extra electrons make atoms go 'splodey.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"And at the Left hand of the lord stood an angel of fertility, birthing a half dozen babies from her half dozen birth canals. She was the Hexapuss."

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

A lot less intimidating than the logo:

 

This is from the last election in 2020. How fun that it's still relevant!

view more: next ›