Thank FUCK you edited that horrible FUCKING word, so that my innocent eyes aren't FUCKING desecrated.
Tits.
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
665 points (91.6% liked)
Science Memes
20355 readers
2481 users here now
Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
- Infographics welcome, get schooled.
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
Research Committee
Other Mander Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
- !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
- !anthropology@mander.xyz
- !arachnology@mander.xyz
- !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
- !biodiversity@mander.xyz
- !biology@mander.xyz
- !biophysics@mander.xyz
- !botany@mander.xyz
- !ecology@mander.xyz
- !entomology@mander.xyz
- !fermentation@mander.xyz
- !herpetology@mander.xyz
- !houseplants@mander.xyz
- !medicine@mander.xyz
- !microscopy@mander.xyz
- !mycology@mander.xyz
- !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
- !nutrition@mander.xyz
- !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
- !palaeontology@mander.xyz
- !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
- !plantid@mander.xyz
- !plants@mander.xyz
- !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz
Physical Sciences
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !chemistry@mander.xyz
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !geography@mander.xyz
- !geospatial@mander.xyz
- !nuclear@mander.xyz
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
- !spectroscopy@mander.xyz
Humanities and Social Sciences
Practical and Applied Sciences
- !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
- !gardening@mander.xyz
- !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
- !soilscience@slrpnk.net
- !terrariums@mander.xyz
- !timelapse@mander.xyz
Memes
Miscellaneous
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I suggest autoreplacing it with a more technical term.
~~fuck~~ sex
SEX
That's a sexing dolphin.
Fun fact: Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny.
Depending on what species a foetus looks like, you can make a guess for how long it has been present inside a womb.
Source: Haeckel's Embryos.
You are never going to convince me the biggest vilain in the whole world is fucking religion. I hate religious people with all my heart
isn't fucking religion
Or
You are never going to convince me; the biggest villain in the world is fucking religion.
Lot of faith in that analysis, I guess.
I do honestly think land ownership is the greatest evil. Because if houses aren't a commodity then a lot of problems (homelessness, hoarding, environmental damage, corporate bullshit, etc) start to be a lot harder to justify.
I think it's in the top 5:
-
Capitalism
-
Patriarchy
-
Racism (I consider this tied with patriarchy tbh)
-
Religion
-
People who take two seats on public transit with no justification
Religion is a rationale for other evils. It is in itself not evil.
Patriarchy and racism (and many religions do that too) are all the same thing - chauvinism, the belief in the superiority of the own group. This also includes nationalism, homophobia, xenophobia and any other "I hate you because you are different"-isms
So I'd go with:
- Chauvinism
- Capitalism (greed)
- People who blast music on speaker in public transit
I think people blasting music on hiking trails is slightly above public transit.
Wildly better list. One of the failings of liberal/left minded people in recent decades has been to become list makers. "We will stand up for the rights of women [pause for applause], blacks [pause for applause], the elderly [pause for applause], etc...." sounds real nice until someone listening says "what about me?" It's a losing political strategy in a world where the words "All Americans" and "everyone" exist. At the absolute least, tag those words on the end.
To be clear since this keeps coming up from people who like to put words in other people's mouths then tell them those words are wrong, I am not saying laws can't protect/benefit marginalized groups. This is about communication.
Even though you hate religious people with all your heart
Somebody do better please. Sources are Wikimedia.
90% of scientists agree
Even if that were true these kinds of people are notorious for discounting the vast majority consensus because some lunatic said otherwise. It's almost like science has no bearing to them unless it validates their preconceived ideas.
Exactly the problem and they all cite a paper written by a pro life conservative who works at the Hamilton foundation which is a conservative 'think tank'.
The paper itself is abysmally stupid. He emailed about 60 000 people with 5 or so confoundingly, unnecessarily complex question (manipulated) and about 30 000 or so responded and then he interpreted the answers and made the conclusion that like 90% of respondents agree that life begins at conception.
Morons say 90% of scientists agree, which is not even what the paper claims at all which itself is not good.
He could have just asked 'does human life begin at conception'? Also he complained (author) in a podcast about the paper about how so many faculty at the college he was st during the paper writing urged him to continue with the project and then spins that to baskcally say pro women's rights advocates are in a conspiracy against life and were all democratic demons in a death cult (more or less)
90% of scientists agree you pull random percentages out of your ass.
Here you go OP. It’s actually ok to swear on the internet.
I hate it. I downvote every censored post.
mUh EnGaGeMeNt StAtS
I don't get at all this trend of badly censored words.
Yes, **** the fuck.
They try to be a rebel, but still wanna please facists algorithms. American puritanism BS. Fuck that.
One theory is that it's done intentionally to farm engagement from people pointing it out. Also I think most mainstream platforms heavily push down in the algorithm content that isn't sanitised. This is to make the platform more appealing to advertisers because the platform's userbase is the product.
As for why the words are partly censored instead of completely censored I'm not sure. I'd guess it's to game the algorithm while also making the word completely obvious.
Either way, if this is the behaviour that you engage in on a platform, that platform is terrible and you are an attention obsessed idiot.
load more comments
(3 replies)
MY EYES! NOOOOO! MY INNOCENCE!!!!
load more comments
(7 replies)
Pfft, we have a hard time proving people under 1 billion net worth are human live nowadays.
Even if it was a human, Chris would be wrong with his lie about "90% of scientists." Not sure why people think a lie will help their argument in cases like this.
Eh... A Human fetus is human, but it is not "a human". Your toenail clippings are human.
Plus, the humanity or personhood of a fetus doesn't really matter for the pro-choice position. Simply put, there is no (other) legal situation that can compell you to give up your bodily autonomy.
Example. I can shoot someone in the street in cold blood, and they could die without a blood transfusion. The courts cannot compell me to do something as harmless as donating blood to save that person's life. A fetus, despite arguably being a person, does not have a right to your blood, your breath, your nutrients, or a space inside your body. Full stop.
Wow. I have never heard this argument articulated in this way. Thanks!
Am scientist (not in life sciences). If someone showed me this image, I'd have absolutely no idea what I'm looking at. So that's one for the 10%, I guess.
I had a...call? survey? at some point from an entity that probably gave rise to this data. It was basically a push-poll that used question order and positive reinforcement to try to get people to agree that abortion is murder.
Mostly, it tried to conflate "human" with "a human," starting out with things like "are cells isolated from humans still human?" "Can cultured cells be called 'viable?'" "So would you agree that tissue cultured from a human donor is viable, human tissue?"
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
Fucking.
Fucking?
XXX style.
I do love the "blank slate mammal" look we all seem to share at this stage.
A just a few less cells and it compares to birds, reptiles and fish.
We all start off as weird worm-like gilled things, huh
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Amazing how we (or any organism complex enough to have organs) are just a pair of cells that underwent a sequence of protein-controlled division, folding and diversification. And excretion and consumption that formed and maintains non-cellular parts like fluids and bones. Plus the microbiome but arguably that's not you, much like mites.
view more: next ›