Seleni

Doesn’t mean she doesn’t have standards.

Huh? It is a new movie. It’s a sequel to Spaceballs.

Y’know, sometimes I forget Chris Rock used to have a functioning brain.

$5 says it’s less that and more y’all disagreed with him about something and his fragile little ego couldn’t handle it lol.

Ahem. From the article:

This is what Hambrecht and Parsons are doing with their male-only gyms. They’re spreading conspiracies about morality and traditional marriage that cast women as dangerous. They’re promoting men rising up as warrior-kings who are ready to fight evil, and they’re getting rid of women who they claim are ruining everything.

Sorry. I tend to use Lemmy as another stand-in for fediverse, same as people say Kleenex for facial tissues.

But you still seem to think this ban on interacting too much with people is a good thing, which I just can’t fathom.

No-one can vote on a post more than once, and the votes are meaningless anyways. Plus, the more content and interactions, the better the fediverse is. So why stop people from voting to their heart’s content? The admin even flat-out said he thought too much interaction in the fediverse was a bad thing, which is like… that’s why we’re here? To interact with people?

Yes, but PugJesus hosted all his stuff on Pifed. That’s why he left; it was just too much to move.

And again, if he was hitting it regularly, just a regular Lemmy content creator, that limit was way too fucking low.

And again, since the limit is well-displayed, it’s not hard to get around it.

So it’s fucking stupid.

No? Again, one account, one vote per comment. Each account votes once, on one person’s comment, isn’t going to trigger shit.

If anything, making a ton of puppet accounts and having only some vote in rotation to push your agenda would be the best way to get around it. So it encourages a problem while claiming to fix a problem that isn’t there.

Worse, it drives off the people who are on Lemmy a lot and make a lot of the content. That idiot admin just wants Lemmy to be silent, and he should just unplug his computer and go touch grass on a mountainside somewhere if he wants silence.

But again, that’s a group. It doesn’t trigger over an entire instance, it triggers only on individual accounts. So it would do absolutely nothing against an issue like that, as I pointed out.

Maybe that was what the wrestling was about? She was trying to force the manatee to be more modest by making them wear a bikini?

Right, and like he points out, as a frequent poster he often engages low-key with the people who comment on his posts with upvotes. So this really made it hard to engage for him.

Regardless it’s a shit decision by the admin. Everyone on Lemmy gets one upvote/downvote per post they interact with. It’s not as if you can upvote or downvote a post multiple times (unless you go though multiple accounts, which that stupid rule wouldn’t fix anyways), so who cares if some people are upvoting or downvoting more than others? That just means they’re on Lemmy more, which is fine.

So it’s a shit rule for something that isn’t a problem, and doesn’t address a possible adjacent problem (making lots of puppet accounts to push personal agendas) that could actually be an issue. That admin is just an idiot and an ass. I don’t blame Pug for leaving.

I dunno, seems like ‘but I have a black friend’ or ‘I’m not racist but…’ energy, if they’re dumb enough to think blahaj of all places is a terrorist organization…