this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
274 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

19765 readers
1962 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I know the false one is toxic and fatal... But is it also delicious? We need to know.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Generally speaking poisonous things taste bad but not always! Add it to the data

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 4 points 41 minutes ago

It's how we know! Just put it in your mouth and let us know.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I will trust AI 100% the minute any of the AI tech bros eat a mystery mushroom based purely on the output of AI content.

[–] e0qdk@reddthat.com 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Not good enough for me knowing there are Thomas Midgley Juniors out there:

On October 30, 1924, Midgley participated in a press conference to demonstrate the apparent safety of TEL, in which he poured TEL over his hands, placed a bottle of the chemical under his nose, and inhaled its vapor for sixty seconds, declaring that he could do this every day without succumbing to any problems. [...] Midgley later took a leave of absence from work after being diagnosed with lead poisoning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Midgley_Jr.

He was the jackass who invented both leaded gasoline and CFCs and inflicted them on the world.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Yes, but a mystery mushroom would likely have much quicker-acting effects and it would be glorious to watch a bunch of these goobers keep over or absolutely trip balls on live television.

[–] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

there was this german books on cooking with mushrooms, with some parts actually written by a fungi expert and they were finishing up the project and the editorial went on to the glorious idea to save money on the illustrations, and decided to go AI against the will of the author and the expertise of everyone else and go ahead on the print.

well… they had to destroy the whole edition.
who could have known?

https://www.stern.de/kultur/buecher/warum-ein-pilz-kochbuch-nun-vom-markt-genommen-werden-musste-36100284.html

[–] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

When AI is involved in creating books, errors can occur. And if the subject is edible mushrooms, the danger can even be life‑threatening. In Hut ab! – Das Pilz‑Kochbuch from Callwey Verlag, author Martin H. Lorenz gathered recipes from renowned chefs such as Eckart Witzigmann, Franck Giovannini, Johann Lafer, and Vincent Klink. The publisher also provided exclusive photographs by Julia Schmidt, Nikolas Hagele, and Caroline Wimmer. The result is a product that would have been of genuine interest to many hobby cooks, especially in autumn. Nevertheless, the cookbook cannot be purchased for now. Besides the photos and recipes, the book also contains illustrations that have caused problems—because, apparently, artificial intelligence (AI) was at least partly involved in their creation. On the Reddit platform, users expressed confusion over the book’s images, noting that several mushroom species were depicted incorrectly. Laypeople could have confused edible mushrooms with similarly looking poisonous ones based on those illustrations. Mushroom expert speaks out The mushroom specialist involved in the production, Dennis Regul, has now publicly commented on the incident: “It concerns the book ‘Hut ab! Das Pilz‑Kochbuch’. I was involved, reviewed the content and gave feedback on errors. I received no fee, only five copies of the book. During the collaboration I discovered AI‑generated pictures and reported that they were completely unsuitable. Unfortunately, I have since found that they were still used,” he wrote on Instagram and Facebook. “I consider the AI‑generated images dangerous. I want to point this out because beginners could be led to collect the wrong mushrooms.” The publisher disputes this. According to a spokesperson, the graphics are not fully AI‑generated; they were created by in‑house illustrators and then visually harmonised with AI. The errors slipped in during that process—errors that the mushroom expert did not manage to spot in time. Although Regul provided critical feedback on some illustrations, those were corrected before publication. At Callwey, an intensive investigation is now underway to determine how the mistakes arose. The publisher has acted quickly: the book has been withdrawn from the market. Whether it will be reissued with corrected illustrations has not yet been decided; according to the spokesperson, this will not happen before 2026. AI becomes a problem for illustrators Earlier, the professional association of illustrators (Illustratoren‑Organisation, IO) had already criticised the use of AI in the industry. “When asked about the biggest future challenge, ‘Artificial Intelligence’ was by far the top answer. Moreover, reports are increasing about missing commissions, changed requests and price collapses,” the statement reads.

(translated with AI 🤖)

[–] Small_Quasar@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Well, you've got to admit getting us to poison ourselves with mushrooms is a bit more subtle than Skynet's plan.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 2 points 1 hour ago

Come on, at least tell us how many differences we're supposed to be spotting.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

How dare you insinuate an AI app could replace Uncle Iroh?

[–] turdas@suppo.fi 21 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

Lmao jesus christ

[–] amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 3 points 5 hours ago

LBM (little brown mushrooms): consider it dangerous unless you really are a true expert.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Most edible mushrooms are easy to identify. At least I think so.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Well, one could argue that it is the other way around. We consider most mushrooms as feasibly edible when it is easy enough to distinguish them from non-edible ones. There are thousands of mushroom species out there that are probably edible but that are just not worth anyone's time. And we also focus more on certain groups of mushrooms that contain a higher percentage of edible ones, like boletes (and also champignons).

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

That's fair. Few people dare to eat the edible Amanitas, although they're said to be quite tasty. If the deadly species didn't exist, they would probably be much more popular.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago

All mushrooms are edible. At least once.