OpenStars

joined 2 years ago
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

It very well could be, yes. Or else simply do not care one way or another. That is a large problem with the current state of AI is how irresponsibly it is very often trained - i.e. ignoring the concept of consent, as the scrapers e.g. disregard the robots.txt declarations.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

Always has been.

img

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

Wait, shouldn't it be the other way around?

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 9 hours ago

I think I've seen this episode...

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 4 points 9 hours ago

Be a part of the change that you would like to see in the world?

Or maybe not, I dunno. 🤪

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 10 hours ago

It is definitely not real...

^I^ ^hope^

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I haven't gotten any 504 errors that I can recall, but the entire Fediverse, and even the entire Internet, often comes under attack by things like bot scraping DNS attempts these days.

Here we are not the big boys like Google, Facebook, etc. to swat them aside so easily with our dedicated (and paid) team of expert professional IT support professionals.

These Fediverse instances are more like hobbies, outside of the largest ones like Lemmy.World, so some small amounts of downtime is to be expected.

Edit: the Fediverse Explorer shows uptime stats if you are interested - e.g. PieFed.ca shows 99.63%, which is exactly in-line with the other most populated ones. Hint: sort by decreasing Active Users to see that it is the #3 most popular PieFed instance.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social -3 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I mean, they can and are doing that right now, haha! 😂

And sometimes they even have a point, buried incredibly deeply, about how we could improve things across the Threadiverse, but it requires so very much effort to translate past all the BS and outright lies (intentional or otherwise) that 99/100 times it simply is not worth the effort. Plus it leaves you drained, exhausted, and burnt-out, without a clear vision of what needs doing in order to move forward.

Which is presumably the very point of much of this drama seeking - to throw everything at the wall and see what sticks, in order to "win" their POV by any means necessary (rather than aim for truth as an end-goal and work towards that collectively).

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Because more people would be promoting it if that were the case? It is what it is, I'm not meaning to knock it, just wanting to seek clarity in its promotion. There are always going to be trade-offs, and it is up to each end-user to decide whether they can live with them.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Check this pinned post in the current community: This is not a complaints forum, which among other things clearly states:

If you have problems with an entire instance: Just leave it.

Other communities, such as YPTB, would be a more appropriate forum for this. As it is, this post is merely drama farming.

10
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by OpenStars@piefed.social to c/piefed_meta@piefed.social
 

I wrote out a very long and detailed reply to someone, citing sources and putting quite some time into crafting my message, only to be presented with a message "replier blocked" in red font. Or if I attempt via a direct URL to the comment, I get a different presentation of the similar message saying "Your reply was not accepted because Replier blocked", in black text against a pink background (in my dark mode view with PieFed theme, using Firefox on Android).

I am fairly certain that the person I was attempting to reply to has not blocked me, as we talk all the time including DMs even. So I suspect it is the account above them that has me blocked?

Although in this case, why am I able to see their content, if I am "blocked"? The person I attempted to reply to is on a Lemmy instance, but the person who I suspect blocked me is on the same instance as me, PieFed.social. I can see their profile too, but attempting to enter the page to send a DM confirms that one of us has blocked the other, and their username is not in my block list so it must have been them blocking me. I am writing all of this out to show my process of discovery.

Can a visual indicator be added to comments that are going to result in me wasting (potentially significant amounts of) time attempting to reply to but that will result in failure?

Otherwise this amounts to shadow-banning, which is not going to be a good look for Piefed and will hinder its acceptance in the community.

Left to my own devices, while surely I could place a visual icon next to the names of such accounts, there are too many problems with that approach to make it viable. (1) I would have to discover the situation first, (2) plus as seen above what if I am incorrect in my determination there, (3) plus that situation might change over time - e.g. if a block was added accidentally, or otherwise reconsidered and removed.

Having been blocked is crucial information, which is preventing me from discoursing with my actual friend in this case. And currently the only way I seem to be able to discover this fact is to either enter the page to send them a DM or not merely open the reply box but go ahead and compose and make a FULL attempt to send off a reply message to either them or also including everyone who has replied below them as well.

The indicator of this phenomena needs to have occurred MUCH sooner in the process, to avoid frustrations. No means no, I totally respect that much at least, but I wish I had been told that, somehow?

11
community themes (piefed.social)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by OpenStars@piefed.social to c/piefed_meta@piefed.social
 

Sometimes community mods set their community-specific themes to something that is entirely unreadable - like dark text on top of a black background for a spoiler box, itself on top of a light-colored background (where the dark text would have been readable, except the spoiler box changing everything). I am having to turn off community theme overrides entirely as a result if I want to read the content.

One suggestion could be to provide a link to an external testing tool, or better yet put some automated testing directly into the code where the community themes are built, to alert people to such accessibility considerations? Honestly the latter might be more work than strictly necessary... but it also sounds kinda fun so I thought I would mention it 🤔🤣.

img

 

(in case not obvious, an homage to this post)

 
 

- source

This illustration makes use of the double entendre of the techie word "cloud" to mean both a server farm and also those white-ish or grey puffy things up in the sky.

80
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by OpenStars@piefed.social to c/nonpolitical_comics@piefed.social
 

- source

If this is not a good fit for the community let me know.

Edit: for people who can't see hashtags, this is programming humor about a website (where people mainly only care about how things appear from the perspective of the end-user).

 
124
Gotcha! (media.piefed.social)
 

(it really would be nice to see a more graceful handling of these)

238
Gotcha! (i.imgflip.com)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by OpenStars@piefed.social to c/memes@lemmy.world
 

Edit: and what do you know, 16 minutes after cross-posting this to !piefed_meta@piefed.social, Rimu agrees, changes the code, and deploys onto piefed.social to retain deleted posts. PieFed really is something!! (announcement post)

 
 

Do you ever feel like you see too much? In this profound lecture, we explore the experience of the highly perceptive person—the one who walks into a room and instantly feels the unspoken tensions, hidden sorrows, and secret truths. This talk reveals why this "gift" of clear seeing can be the most dangerous thing you'll ever possess.

Discover the four hidden dangers of being deeply intuitive: the profound isolation of living in a different reality, the impossible choice between speaking truth and losing yourself, the pain of becoming a target for those who prefer illusion, and the devastating risk of losing your own identity by absorbing the emotions of others. This isn't about being "too sensitive"; it's about navigating a world that isn't ready for your clarity.

This is a complete guide to transforming this potential curse back into a gift. Learn the art of "conscious distance"—how to see clearly without the compulsion to fix, how to protect your energy, and how to hold your awareness as a quiet strength rather than an unbearable burden. Stop trying to wake up the world, and instead, learn to live peacefully with your own eyes wide open.

 

Do you ever feel like you see too much? In this profound lecture, we explore the experience of the highly perceptive person—the one who walks into a room and instantly feels the unspoken tensions, hidden sorrows, and secret truths. This talk reveals why this "gift" of clear seeing can be the most dangerous thing you'll ever possess.

Discover the four hidden dangers of being deeply intuitive: the profound isolation of living in a different reality, the impossible choice between speaking truth and losing yourself, the pain of becoming a target for those who prefer illusion, and the devastating risk of losing your own identity by absorbing the emotions of others. This isn't about being "too sensitive"; it's about navigating a world that isn't ready for your clarity.

This is a complete guide to transforming this potential curse back into a gift. Learn the art of "conscious distance"—how to see clearly without the compulsion to fix, how to protect your energy, and how to hold your awareness as a quiet strength rather than an unbearable burden. Stop trying to wake up the world, and instead, learn to live peacefully with your own eyes wide open.

view more: next ›