this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
117 points (100.0% liked)

news

24706 readers
582 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PurrLure@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I read the article and it's incredible how much disrespect the divorced dad gets by omission.

"Beloved honors student son... and the dad." "My son was always smiling, laughing; he had an aura about him." "Oh yeah and btw the dad was "reportedly" pursuing a doctorate's degree."

Both the mom and the reporter seem to hold the divorced dad partially responsible for buying a Tesla in the first place lmao. Still hope they win that lawsuit, but I doubt they'll ever make the cars safer in the USA unless they're legally obligated to.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean maybe don't let your stupid bazinga car drive for you and you won't drive into a tree and kill yourself and your child I disrespect the man also

[–] PurrLure@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Honestly the only funny part of this whole thing is the disrespect, he earned it.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Also getting a PhD that's for loser nerds lol you'll never get a job with that degree

[–] Pentacat@hexbear.net 34 points 2 days ago

Cars should have door handles that don’t require electricity.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it's funny, in general, that Teslas are killing people. I do think it's funny when they kill the kind of guys Dril is tweeting about here, as long as those guys don't take someone with them.

[–] Pastaguini@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I dunno, one of the people killed was a child.

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Yes, and that's not funny.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] WafflesTasteGood@hexbear.net 65 points 2 days ago (3 children)

At the same time, the vehicle’s electric-powered door handles became inoperable once the battery system caught fire, preventing the two from getting out or rescuers getting in

How many times does this have to happen! screm3

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's so ridiculous to have the interior handles not unlock when the door has no power.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look, sure… if you have the doors default to unlocked then you can escape a life-threatening situation.

But if you have the doors default to locked then nobody can get into your car and take your stuff.

So like, are you really gonna value your life more than your stuff? That wouldn’t be very tech libertarian of you.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know you're doing a bit, but I did say "interior handles" for exactly that reason. There's no reason you can't make them different, right?

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago

That sounds like it would increase production costs.

If the market demands it, surely Tesla will bear the expense.

[–] NeelixBiederman@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

actually at least some Tesla models do have manual door actuators. You have to punch out the door speaker panel and grab them from in there

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i thought it was in the glove box

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They both screamed as they frantically searched for the actuators, never having confirmed where they were, or if they ever existed at all.

[–] MineDayOff@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago

"We fixed the issue. And by that, we mean that every Tesla now comes with a complimentary glass breaker on your keychain."

In all seriousness though that would actually be better than what they're doing, which is nothing.

[–] nasezero@hexbear.net 38 points 2 days ago

live-kissinger-reaction

speech-r still love the truck

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago
[–] bricklove@midwest.social 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

In the model X the stupid falcon wing doors have their emergency release cable hidden behind the speaker screen. The screen is not easy to remove and there's nothing in the car indicating it's there. I had to look online how to escape this piece of shit if it caught on fire. I don't know why these things are allowed on the road.

"Please complete the following captcha if you'd like to survive your crash" type vehicle

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Don't get in a helicopter, small plane, submarine, tesla.

[–] Dr_Pepper@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

My ex and I actually have a rule that our daughter is never allowed in a Tesla.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

with temperatures that get so hot, they can literally pulverize a person’s bones.

is this a regional use of the word "pulverize" I'm not familiar with? Never heard it used when referring to incineration style damage.

[–] GladimirLenin@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Pulver in swedish means powder (i think in german too). So i'd assume the literal meaning of pulverize just means turn to dust or powder.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago

Perhaps the author knows "pulverize" means "reduce to dust/small pieces" but not that it implies blunt force trauma and not something like being burned to ash. Maybe they asked a chatbot for a word meaning to reduce to small pieces or something? I can't imagine it would be AI generated directly or through an edit pass, since if anything that kind of generation would be more likely to keep the word with the sort of context its usually in without incorrectly matching part of its meaning, although maybe the context being a car crash made a chatbot short out and go "car crash -> impact -> pulverise" in an inappropriate clause.

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why is self-driving in scare quotes? it did drive itself, right into the tree

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

because tesla's "self-driving" isn't what any reasonable person thinks self-driving means

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Its actually Full Self Driving smuglord

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I hate this so much I hate that parents are just trying to go through life and do their best and we won't do the bare minimum to stop ~~the world becoming~~ capitalists from making the world an incrementally and unpredictably more dangerous place at every scale.

Its so easy to be smug and victim blame and "still love the car tho" etc. But I can't do it anymore.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 26 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Just because it’s self-driving doesn’t mean it won’t drive drunk.

[–] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People trusting teslas self driving after it's consistent issues and Elon bragging about how they're doing it as cheap as possible is astonishing

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People trusting Tesla to successfully deliver on any of Elon’s promises after it consistently fails to is astonishing.

Self driving was supposedly going to be ready by something like 2016. 10 years later teslas can drive themselves into trees.

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

(rant incoming I didn't mean to direct all this at you specifically lol but here I go pressing reply anyway)

Telsas are especially ridiculous for this because they sold this "auto pilot" lie but I did a bit of a deep dive into "driver aids" and in particular the stuff that is mandated in new cars by law, and it is fucking terrifying.

Any laws mandating complex driver aid stuff are looking like regulatory capture artifacts to me now. The tech isn't ready, it isn't reliable and there are regular cars from makers you would normally trust, that have a habit of trying to swerve the cars into crash barriers.

I'm talking about the shit that's supposed to stop you from accidentally leaving your lane, or detecting a potential collision and slowing down, or braking distance maintenance stuff. Almost none of it is reliable enough to trust your life to without paying even closer attention than you need to just to drive a car normally. (Read: it becomes a distraction at best)

Euro, Asian, American, all makers from all regulatory regions have issues with one or more or all of their driver aids according to the studies I read.

I was chatting with neighbours recently and they all turn that shit off when they get in the car. if they can. the ones who can't or dont know how just drive terrified.

This stuff breaks the cybernetic loop (operator <---> machine, continuous exchange of data) of driving which we all took for granted and don't understand the value of. Its so dangerous. The way we on average have forgotten how to use computers and are "just along for the ride" as far as our personal tech devices go, is rapidly becoming true also for hurling multi ton machines down roads at high speed with us inside them.

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I literally was discussing this with some relatives a day or so ago. I had to pull over on a highway twice when driving my mum's car. Once to turn off the auto high-beams and once to turn off the lane assist that tried to steer me into roadworks (it followed the solid line not the dotted line)

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

I'm glad you survived the machines' assassination attempt on you. It's ridiculous.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I’ve never owned a car with the type of driver “aid” you’re talking about. It’s rare that I drive (or even get driven by something other than a bus or train), even, but I won’t deny I’ve got a dumb car that doesn’t try to steer me into trees - it’s basically all on me if I crash.

There are automotive technologies that have definitely made my driving “safer”: I’ve felt ABS kick in when I suddenly hit the brakes way too hard because I was dumb enough to think that I can devote less complete attention to my surroundings. I wouldn’t have had the muscle memory to pump the brakes myself. Being able to stop faster because a computer knew to pump the brakes for me, I have no doubt, has prevented me from an accident.

The idea that I could be so distracted as to be saved from an accident by “lane assist” technology is terrifying.

Having had plenty of cars nearly buzz me on my bike, I’m absolutely certain that when I drive I’m paying far more attention than way too many people do, though.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

Eventually, my car from 2010 is going to bite the dust and I'm going to have to get a newer one and I'm preemptively pissed about it. I've got an ebike and use it when I can, but I live somewhere that it isn't practical to use for all transportation and I need a car, unfortunately. 2008-2014 or so is the technological sweet spot for me: my car has power windows, remote start for when it's 15° outside, and Bluetooth for my music. It also has no screens, no "assistive technology," all analog controls, and can be worked on by a normal mechanic without special software. It sucks so much that all this shitty tech that makes cars less safe to drive and harder to use/work on is now mandatory.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hohsia@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago
[–] Salah@hexbear.net 27 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Imagine how easy it would be for Melon to assassinate people with ‘accidents’ like this

load more comments
view more: next ›