[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago

I've been watching Majority Report with Sam Seder. Watched Breaking points since they were on the Rising with The Hill. Something just started to slowly change with them when they broke off. There's the constant Ad's (which is understandable, but was excessive), segments hidden behind a paywall, personalities started to change after surgery then Kyle Kulinski got heavily into the mix including romantically. I don't know, just seemed the show started to take over the lives of the hosts, Sam and Emma have been a breathe of fresh air on Majority (even when Emma drinks a little too much lol). The show is their job and Sam is pretty professional, decent daily live show with clips of segments also being uploaded.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago

Just want to highlight this channel, it's a great resource and his group does a free weekly newsletter you can sign up for as well as the video version on his channel. He covers users questions on live streams a lot of times and goes in-depth with interviews and space topics covering just about everything.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

There is a sale this weekend at a nearby store, 2/10$ and It felt like the soda apocalypse in there with everyone running around grabbing up case after case. I don't get it, one can and my mouth feels nasty while my body is demanding water to wash it down. I guess if your body is addicted to it you get a different reaction.

The really disturbing part was seeing all the kids gleefully freaking out as they helped carry case after case (some could barely carry one case because they were so young). I have addictions myself and the parent's purchase is their own prerogative, but I would never let my kid participate in my bad habits.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

Seriously, thank you for taking the time to read and respond. The 3rd link is a long word salad of an article they probably could've done better with, some highlights:

Another long, contentious new calendar process then might mean uncertainty with real electoral consequences — perhaps even making it difficult for Democrats running in a competitive presidential primary to know where to campaign, hire staff and advertise.

“These early states really do condition the campaign. The early states don’t guarantee a winner, but they tell us who is going to lose, at least in the first rounds,” Redlawsk said. “The winnowing is very likely to be different if the first state is South Carolina, or Nevada, or some combination, than if it were Iowa or New Hampshire.”

The party can try and mitigate that by starting its 2028 calendar discussions early, potentially even weeks after next year’s election. (we'll see if this come to fruition)

It's effective when you take into consideration what DNC spokesmen require, "they did not reach the standards for their nomination: a candidacy that is "generally advocated and recognized in the news media,".

I can link articles and interviews by Bernie if you wish but I'm going to assume you know of the legal battles and statements made by him during the campaigning and after. "fall-in-line" is definitely my words, but then you go on to describe exactly what fall in line means. The term does come across as negative but the reality is he made declarative statements beforehand and has now changed his position in favor of what the DNC wishes to do... there are other terms I could use I guess but the general description is the same.

I incorrectly assumed you were using the "this is a foreign bot" defense and were telling other people to not drink the kool-aid that I see used all the time so actual conversations can't develop. It's why I included the you and I part so I do apologize for that.

I can't come to the same conclusion you have with the data, I've pointed out just a few of the ways in which the DNC jerryrigs their primaries and candidates. We see the manipulation of media and the cost of running a candidacy which completely undermines any contender. We aren't seeing any "viable challengers" because of decades of hurdles and organizations (both local and national) that limit those who are highlighted, which in turn allows the DNC to say "well we don't think they have a chance so they're not allowed to run". It's like a boxing match where every opponent of Biden's has to wear weights and have their hands tied but "Biden would've won anyways because he's the better boxer".

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago

Article about the performance of Biden and the Democrats response

But But it's unfair because they didn't talk about Trump! This is exactly why we are in this mess to begin with.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

AIPAC Unleashes a Record $14.5 Million Bid to Defeat a Critic of Israel

Democratic officials keep other competitors off North Carolina ballot, leaving Biden the only choice

The Democratic Party promised to overhaul its primaries. Doing that has been anything but simple

Biden's Democratic challengers hit ballot access roadblocks

jfc, stop falling back to the easiest and lowest form of defense because of "rightwing and foreign operatives". This is a conversation between you and I. Bernie Sanders understands the game better than anyone here, and had to fall in line... how is that not a statement against what you're proposing here?

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago

more hand-waving, "anyone can make a video platform". No, you need infrastructure, SEO attention, Creators, etc etc. You don't just "decide" to run in elections, the bar for entry is beyond anything a citizen or even most politicians can accrue. Bernie Sanders fell in line a long time ago with the same party he openly said was unfairly treating elections. Vote Biden if that's your choice and I fully support that, but we need to stop sugar coating and pretending everything is A-ok in the DNC if we ever want an elected official who represents the average voter in the party.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

could you reference one better understanding of a policy you got out of it? Looking at it from the lens of undecided/independent voters, I didn't get any information out of it but an upcoming golf game.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

"roll out voting rights", definitely agree with your other statement about the other party taking voting rights but I haven't seen sources for "rolling out" voting rights from the Dems. They may fight gerrymandering which hurts their election chances but I don't see actual democracy being expedited.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 days ago

I get so tired of seeing people hand-wave away democracy like it's some kind of amateur sport. This is not how fair and impartial primaries are ran. We can recognize the tech-monopolies and the unfair practices (and untold wealth) they use to squash competition but when it comes to elections? shrug

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago

something doesn''t feel right....

29

I think this is the biggest problem I see in people trying to understand deeper fields of study, a concept is just too large or out of our perceived reality to even make sense without years of knowledge. I think people fall into the "woo woo" just because it's easier to not really know versus becoming a doctorate in a field of study who has slowly built that knowledge on the fundamental principles needed.

But either way, when you start, you just have to accept that something has a cause and effect. We can't see most fields, just have to accept they are there and interacting the proposed ways because of our tiny little sensors. Sometimes, we just have to say "ok" even if it boggles the mind.

47
submitted 2 months ago by Cataphract@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I've officially concluded I'm at a loss for how to determine if a product is worth it's cost anymore.

  • Brand loyalty with local retailers is non-existent anymore, big box stores etc all seem to be switching manufacturers and I can't buy the same products that were offered before

  • Online reviews are no longer reliable. On site, it's paid reviews by "special" users who are given perks to review. Off site it's paid affiliation links, all of which scream "conflict of interest" to an actual honest review.

  • Ratings are no longer functional. I can view 20+ products and all 1 star reviews or even 5 star reviews just look like copy/paste from competitors or their own employees. Every product has the same reviews now.

  • Quality Control is gone. It's all being mass produced with no oversight, it's a hit or miss type of ordering now. What's perfect for one person, another person will get defective products repeatedly (even auto parts, store brand tools do the same thing)

  • Return windows are a joke, or you pay extra so you can return something defective after 30 days. This doesn't always mean the product is less defective, but if it does then they've just hidden their full product cost in extra "charges".

  • Less often, companies quality tank when switching manufacturers or lowering production costs. I have no clue how to officially keep up with this unless it's random friends/co-workers or a forum post I stumble onto.

So, besides paying 10x-20x more for a high priced company to hold my hand and apologize for every mistake they make (and they sometimes still ship defective products), what are some effective methods you've used to purchase a decent product that will perform for the entirety of it's intended lifetime?

52
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Cataphract@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

Currently remodeling a domicile, with the sweet and expensive ability to add anything I want within reason. I plan on modernizing the place to bring it into the 21st century because this house deserves it (just a great structure with lots of history and nearing it's centennial birthday).

Luckily, everything is built perfectly for access so nothing is off the table. I came onto this property with my own server "rack" and a mini diy setup for network debauchery, but plan on expanding that and installing a mini-server "room" (a fancy closet I might install in a "dead space" that I can pipe duct work in and out of).

I will be running all new electrical, A/C, Telecom lines, the whole works. I'm currently in the process of ripping out all the old coaxial, phone, piping, anything not ran properly or of a modern importance (probably reinstall phone and doorbell circuits but they're currently strewn everywhere from previous installers). I'm also creating up to date blueprints for the structure and including mechanical systems/engineering schematics for anything I'm doing or plan to do. All of this will be saved to a USB for the next owner and printed out for a laminated notebook to stay with the house (maybe a copy for myself for the nostalgia one day).

The only 2 things I KNOW I want to do is installing

  • a monitor with a pi that will run a weather and local data program that I've been working on into the kitchen area

  • a multi-camera cctv system (local and offsite backup) with a monitor in a neutral-shared living area.

I will probably leave those parts of the system installed here unless it's requested to be removed. I actually would love to leave everything here as a full system package for someone to "inherit" with the house but I'm not sure if that's a benefit or a hindrance someone wants to receive.

There's 3 different plans in the works (3/5/10 year plans, we are here for family but that will eventually not be required and we desperately want out of this area), depending on the time frame I might need to put in

  • monitoring stations for renewable energy systems (solar/wind),

  • a personalized-home weather monitoring system (barometric,temp,humidity) with a display and functionality to control the mechanical systems (A/C adjustment, daylight sensors for shades/lighting, etc),

and a bunch of other off the wall ideas I've been wanting to tinker with. Unfortunately most videos out there of "home setups" include someone with 10x my price bracket and their system is designed for themselves and their specific equipment in mind. I'm wanting to install something more generic that anyone would have use for (like weather and security). There are really only 2 "office areas" that I think would require a hardline besides any monitors I have to install for systems (I don't mind running wiring, but I don't think every room needs an ethernet port to be functional, or am I wrong thinking this way?). I will probably need to install repeaters in two locations though to cover the entire property in wifi because old houses gobble signals up but inside everything "just" reaches.

Everything I've done with my network so far I've gotten around needing a switch (it would've saved me a lot of hassle in the past but I usually find a way to get everything connected or just disconnect unused equipment that's ran it's course), but at this point I can't expand any further without a headache. So now I'm looking at new tech and equipment I don't have hands-on experience with and don't know it's proper use/limitations which I don't like when making action plans. I figured just trying to get a general sense of what people want or see would be a better angle to come at since I don't do this professionally and don't have the insider knowledge of the taboos of home networking infrastructure.

TLDR: What kind of wiring, connection setups are important to you and won't be obsolete after a few years? What do you consider a "modern" house to have or are decent "quality of life" improvements like lighting control, sensors, etc? What's your best case scenario of equipment when walking into a house and seeing a pre-installed setup?

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 months ago

Holy fuck why is that so beautiful. You've unlocked something in me I didn't know was there and must pursue now.

view more: next ›

Cataphract

joined 10 months ago