this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
117 points (100.0% liked)

news

24706 readers
565 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I’ve never owned a car with the type of driver “aid” you’re talking about. It’s rare that I drive (or even get driven by something other than a bus or train), even, but I won’t deny I’ve got a dumb car that doesn’t try to steer me into trees - it’s basically all on me if I crash.

There are automotive technologies that have definitely made my driving “safer”: I’ve felt ABS kick in when I suddenly hit the brakes way too hard because I was dumb enough to think that I can devote less complete attention to my surroundings. I wouldn’t have had the muscle memory to pump the brakes myself. Being able to stop faster because a computer knew to pump the brakes for me, I have no doubt, has prevented me from an accident.

The idea that I could be so distracted as to be saved from an accident by “lane assist” technology is terrifying.

Having had plenty of cars nearly buzz me on my bike, I’m absolutely certain that when I drive I’m paying far more attention than way too many people do, though.

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

(again this one went off the rails. not a rant at you obviously lol. this topic gets me fired up, clearly)

Yeah the most tech I've had in a personal car is basic airbags, ABS, power steering, etc. I like more and better mechanical safety mechanisms, but I don't want to drive-by-wire and have a servo system running the steering or other important controls.

Properly functioning lane assist probably saves a lot of lives due to driver fatigue. I see people wander out of their lanes to a degree that makes me go "okay prepare for a crash" a few times a year on highways.

What concerns me perhaps more than anything is that even the most disinterested driver behind the wheel of a 20 year old car becomes a critical part of the control loop for the whole machine. This sounds scary, but the whole system tends to work pretty well so long as the driver has a good basic education in driving and the risks of distracted and fatigued driving. The human part of the system extends its senses to absorb what it reads from the car and the mind becomes to one extent or another, "tasked" with the job of becoming the eyes and brain of the whole mechanical system.

As you remove direct control and feedback from the machine the driver stops being the organic mediating part of the whole system and the various ways this starts to make everything more dangerous are not easy to quantify at least for a lay person like me.

An illustrative part of the problem though, keeping with lane assist, is that these technologies are training and conditioning drivers that there is a much larger margin of error for distraction.

If you are a fresh driver and you're driving a car that catches you and guides you back into your lane while you turn in your seat to chat to your friends on the back seat, and that is all you know, then in aggregate you are creating the conditions for more distracted driving accidents rather than reducing the severity of the existing rate of distracted driving accidents.

These assists ostensibly free up mental space so you can be an even better driver, more capable of paying attention to what matters, but since we are removing people from the machine they don't re-allocate their attention to other aspects of managing the vehicle, they use it to do stupid human shit.

That same fresh driver also hasn't learned to notice other people being inattentive. It becomes a social problem too.

Suddenly you find yourself in the driver's seat of the car. You don't even have to reach over to grab the wheel and avert disaster. Instead you watch the car drive you and your son into a tree. Because you are just along for the ride. You aren't really responsible anymore on a basic mechanical level.


I imagine you've noticed the little lights on wing mirrors now that show whether the car has detected a vehicle alongside or in their blindspot? I doubt they work as well for bikes as they do other cars.

Even if they do, a driver who has grown up expecting them to work isn't going to also perform shoulder and mirror checks before merging.

You already know how many people never bothered checking even when it was just an act of faith that they were clear to move over. Now you've got people looking at a little light or relying on a buzz in the steering wheel or whatever, instead of turning their fucking head.

What happens when there's bird shit on the light or on the sensor? All they had to do was turn their fucking head and now they've killed someone. Thanks for the driver assistance.


People blame covid and pandemic measures for the current state of driver ability etc but personally I think its this shit I'm describing.

The US navy has studied cybernetics for a really long time, thats the thing with a person becoming a part of the mechanical system. There's no good rational excuse for us to be making this massive error as a society, but we won't avoid it thanks to mechanisms like regulatory capture. It is unavoidable that this will get worse.

Passengers should be in the passenger seat and/or on public transport not behind the wheel. ;-;

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

not a rant at you

Even without the disclaimers, I don’t think I’d have taken either of these as directed at me, though I’m sure I’ve misinterpreted people in that way. S’all good.

power steering

Haha, holy shit, I’ve briefly had a car without power steering. Fucking nightmare. Shit’s not safe. Having my rear brakes low level leaking brake fluid was better than that, and that was incredibly bad.

Properly functioning lane assist probably saves a lot of lives due to driver fatigue.

On the one hand, I’m sure it has prevented accidents, but this really just reinforces my terror - if someone can’t recognize when they’re so fatigued that they’re relying on lane assist technology to keep them from crashing, they’re way beyond the point where it’s unsafe to be driving.

free up mental space

scared

they don't re-allocate their attention to other aspects of managing the vehicle

10000-com

the little lights on wing mirrors now

I thought those were a positive development previously, even if they aren’t something I regularly “benefit” from. Thanks for scaring me out of that train of thought.

I doubt they work as well for bikes

Repeatedly.

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I thought those were a positive development previously, even if they aren’t something I regularly “benefit” from. Thanks for scaring me out of that train of thought.

I'm sure in a vacuum and sufficiently engineered they are a generally positive development in the short term at least. I don't remember specifically reading horror stories about them or anything, though it sounds like you can attest to them being insufficient to avoid wiping out bikes so I figure they're questionable at best.

They're just sort of emblematic of a broader issue where tech-first "solutions" for increasingly marginal problems are probably leading to a dangerous infantilization of the population, with questionable benefits, especially in the long run, given how unreliable our regulators are and our system's propensity to only optimise for the short term.

Even without the disclaimers, I don’t think I’d have taken either of these as directed at me, though I’m sure I’ve misinterpreted people in that way. S’all good.

Yea I don't remember you ever misinterpreting me like that but it happens pretty regularly in general when I don't clarify my intent or w/e, which is understandable.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

you can attest to them being insufficient to avoid wiping out bikes

Honestly, I don’t notice how new the car is. I just see them getting way too close and wondering if they saw me at all or not.

I don't remember you ever misinterpreting me like that

It’s definitely something I do at times. And yet I also am far too often a sarcastic asshole who lets other people misinterpret me even if I understand that’s happening.