i see elsewhere that wikipedia after all restricted a bit more use of chatbots, and i'm very interested how much kicking and screaming did it involve
TechTakes
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
44 comments in support, 2 in opposition, discussion closed early under the "there's a snowball's chance in Hell of the situation changing from here" clause:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_articles_with_large_language_models/RfC
This account is just that sort of shit 24/7, just constant linkedin lunacy that everyone should treat as rage bait and move on.
I know, but there's just so much to sneer at (especially lately).
I find it very unsatisfactory to sneer at skeets from the above author. It's just junkfood at this point and not like good junkfood, just like stale off-brand popcorn in a bag that has a picture of a sad clown on it. Why is the clown sad? Because the clown has to constantly look at different variations on the same theme written by people whose brains are melted by LinkedIn.
