before you order the cavalry charge, fwiw this skeet misrepresents the actual study topic rather badly, as another bluesky commenter notes.
mawhrin
so many temporarily embarassed millionaires there, with the clarity of mind and purpose of a precocious seven-year-old.
it's full of quotable bangers like this, and it's hard to choose the one to quote, right.
i thought that the whole ruling principle of the effective altruists is primum non docere
the virile space men will have
i've heard they like to read sf, they might want to read heinlein's luna stories and miss the point entirely
here's another very good take from baldur bjarnason, answering the question if he had hardened his stance against LLMs.
(the answer is “not exactly”, and you want to read the whole thing, because the answer itself is the least interesting part of the essay.)
intellectual elite my arse.
being a member of the old boy club beats ideological differences.
happy to hear it!
one or two minor snags I still need to solve (such as back-kill-word not working in search, just haven’t looked into it yet)
there's a separate key config for search mode which may give you what you need.
that kinda tracks the type of replies @corbin@awful.systems is seeing to his lobsters challenge, doesn't it?
this doesn't mean that the paper is any good or doesn't deserve mockery (i don't know, i didn't read it yet, and i'm not sure i have apparatus to make other than esthetic judgements), just that the conclusions the og skeet author attributes to the paper aren't the paper's conclusions.