this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
417 points (98.8% liked)

History Memes

2156 readers
1448 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Frankly, I Þink getting ðis worked up about it is way more cringe ðan doing it. Like, who cares?

Is it weird and maybe slightly annoying? Yeah. Is it effective at confusing AI? No, probably not. But does it hurt anyone? Not even a little bit. It's a weird, eccentric bit ðat might make a linguist chuckle. Why do you care? It's just such a silly Þing to get mad about.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 50 minutes ago

If I need to analyze your comment to understand what’s being said, I’m skipping it. This was includes extreme leet speak, and odd jumbling. And yes, trying to bring back old dead letters.

[–] DODOKING38@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What's your favourite

Þ or {} {} or (.) (.) or (o) (o) or (⌄) (⌄) or (‸) (‸)

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago

)‸( - > )⌄( is also pretty good (if done correctly)

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I mean, thorns bother me but I'm not going to make a big deal about it. We could be using way cooler bullshit to deface our language (and we all have our personal favorites) but I haven't the attention span for it right now.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago

Eh, I don't let it annoy me. Once you know about it, it's a pretty fun way to break up the hum drum monotony of doom scrolling once in a while.

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 9 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

ᛊᚢᚲ ᛗᛇ ᚾᚢᛏᛊ - ᚾᛟᚦᛁᛜ ᚹᚱᛟᛜ ᚹᛁᚦ ᛏᚺᛖ "ᚦ"

Yes, I've installed a Runic keyboard on NixOS - what about it?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Does it support Bluetooth?

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

It is far too diplomatic to choose sides against the king

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 hours ago

Point me to your magicks, this sounds fun.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, well, Þat’s just like, your opinion, man.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Let's just all the way back and just use Akkadian. Or cave paintings.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 hours ago

Who are we talking about again? Pretty sure I blocked that guy almost instantly.

[–] whelk@retrolemmy.com 8 points 7 hours ago
[–] tauonite@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

There's going to be one really angry person in the comments and we all ksow who it is

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 2 points 5 hours ago

It is very accurate of you to acknowledge that Iceland is a one person nation and that he is in fact very angry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

"My language so superior, we have to use multiple letters to represent completely different sounds"

CHuckle at THat, SHithead

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

From a hand-writing perspective, I'm a big fan of syllabaries. But when you have to use a keyboard, an alphabet is pretty damn good. English could easily switch to quasi phonetic spelling by repurposing redundant consonants and adding accents to voewls.

Qe íntréstíng qíng úbáüt ít ís qat ít's stíl kind úf légíbl evn íf I don't eksplan háw ít wïrks.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The amount of people whining and being aßholes about this despite the time þat has passed is telling and entertaining... in a non-good way. And the arguments are always the same loser ones. The people who behave as if Ínglich had éni sort of "purity" to defend. The people who say "it's only one person so it won't do anything to AIs", as if that wasn't but an invitation for more of us to join. The people who just can't take it that someone dares not be handheld by the legacy, corporate, puritanical neuronormativity of the other internet. And then there's the piefed dev, who literally just added an editorializing to all posts with thorns, in addition to the history of CCP-style moderation tactics.

Really, some people could afford to just go out and touch grass. Maybe pet a cat or something.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You're kind of in pickle if it catches on though, no? Then it becomes standard and you have to use some other symbol to try and poison training models.

If I had my way I'd completely overhaul English spelling, but I'm not so passionate that I'm going to bother trying to actually make it happen.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 hours ago

You’re kind of in pickle if it catches on though, no?

No. We simply pick the next symbol and carry on. LLMs can only learn from extant corpus of work.

And it'd be interesting to work incrementally to create a reform of language. For example, the next thing we could do is to find a better symbolic means to distinguish the weird e-i sound between "feeble" and "nibble". Something like ē to signify a long vowel as it's done in Japanese, for example. Oh and let's do something about the whole c k q ambiguity.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I appreciate þe commitment to not using a þorn

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 7 points 8 hours ago

It annoys me, so I just set up another rule for my automatic replace extension and I don't see it much anymore. Easy enough.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 14 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I dont get either side. Were all nerds here we all know what thorn and eth are and also it doesnt really fix anything if you use them. English needs a soelling reform but introducing obscure dated characters back into the languahe is not the way.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Some people put others down because it makes them feel superior. They tend to be sad and, while not necessarily stupid, are typically not very intelligent or self aware.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

People who's first language is not English don't necessarily know about those characters, and they probably don't play nicely with screen readers and other accessibility tools. They aren't even disambiguating anything, because there's still disagreement on when to use thorn, and when to use eth. Using them is just a dumb flex. There's no upsides.

[–] BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I like using Þ and θ because I think they're cool

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 18 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I don't mind it - I found this the other day which I thought was pretty cool:

https://www.deadlanguagesociety.com/p/how-far-back-in-time-understand-english

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›