CheesyFox

joined 2 years ago
[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 16 hours ago

please elaborate on your question

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

yt-dlp also has sponsorblock support, btw.

didn't know that, deff will check it out

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

ffplay is nice, but mpv has yt-dlp integration, and supports addons (love me some nice sponsorblock integration)

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

mpv my beloved

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

To invest billions is more difficult because high growths opportunities with high margins rarely exist in that price range.

Yes, you won't be able to multiply your money. But once you have millions or billions to spare, it's pretty easy to invest them in such a way that the returns will cover more than you spend on a daily basis at least. This easily develops a certain sense of carelessness.

Are they stupid or do they optimize for different constraints? MS could have introduced AI for surveillance and not for growth.

Ubisoft stock prices plummeted down and nearing the historical minimum.

Microsoft's trust in ai is akin walking a bridge across a chasm, while building the said bridge on the go. Considering that linux share actively grows in later years, they're doing a bad job with that bridge. EUs latest concerns about US and reliance on the US technologies don't help either.

The quality of their product also depleeted, thanks to the reliance on aformentioned ai hype train, and usage of inapropriate technologies to build their OS companents (i.e. using react native for the start menu). All of that tops of with dubious investments, be it OpenAI, or bying Activision a few years prior. Not even mentioning the smaller game studios like Tango Gameworks that they bought only to close off immediately. Everything listed can be summarized as poor management decisions.

You might argue that they're rich enough to spare a billion or two on such mistakes, but those mistaces appear to be systematic, rather than one-offs. To me it seems like a start of a slow and very painful fall.

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago

Thanks for my new wallpaper :3

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

they surely will. That doesn't mean they're sharp enough to properly strategize. IMO when you have lots of money, you don't really have to think as much, because it's kust that more easier to breed money when you already have so much. So when the crisis finally comes, you won't be able to properly analyze the situation.

Case in point — corpos like Microsoft and Ubisoft.

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago (6 children)
[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 days ago

yeah, i think something like gachiakuta works waay better with this caption.

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 6 days ago

it's a bit more complicated. Linux runs games with anti-cheats perfectly fine as long as the anti-cheat doesn't require kernel-level access.

Basically, this allows to detect some cheats that would be undetected otherwise. But it also allows anti-cheats for absolutely unrestricted access to any user data. In other words, it's a giant safety vulnerability, that you're forsed to intall, that still doesn't solve the cheating problem.

Not like the devs are actually interested to solve anything anyway, cheaters buy new accounts regularily, stimulating post-release sales.

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

please don't use garlic bread for sexual purposes

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

your deleted comment has the same comedic effect as the bethesda's environmental storytelling skeletons

view more: next ›