CheesyFox

joined 2 years ago
[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 21 hours ago

ah yes, male pattern value increase, completely forgot about it

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 22 hours ago

agreed

fuck the racists and those who let them have exclusive access to my boy Pepe.

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 22 hours ago

especially considering that the dating service is interested in you looking for a partner, not actually finding one

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 22 hours ago

*sad jesus noises*

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

it's Jrock Jhard

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're jumping to conclusions. I see where you're coming from, I might've been more explicit about what exactly I was talking about, so my bad ig. I wasn't talking about Fanon in the first place. More over, I wasn't talking about any book author/philosopher in particular. My logic still applies even to Fanon tho, as, first, he had unique circumstances on his hands, second, our world had changed quite a bit since then too, fyi.

I can't but notice how vague your answer about the Vietnam is. I never asked about Vietnam's success as a sovereign political structure, I was asking about the ordinary people and how all of the events affected their lives. I believe I've made this much clear the first time around.

The era of national divisions eroding is something for after the end of imperialism, in the meantime a people should be able to chart their own course free from the domination of the west.

And what's the reasoning behind that statement? I've already provided my stance and reasoning on why nationalism should go ASAP. You, on the other hand, fail to point out why deimperialization is of such high priority in your worldview.

You seem to think on the geopolitical level, while being just a person, microscopic, compared to a political structure. In modern society, any drastic geopolitical change affects individual well-being only negatively, potentially yielding positive changes in this aspect only decades later, if does so at all. Modern day imperialism is nothing compared to what it was in the past, thus deimperialization is none of our concern, as it won't give any marginal positive change on personal level.

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that's clearly not from terminator

this guy is a minion

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

Cuck Executive Officer

checks out

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

well, it apparently was an issue for me on Mint, when i just switched from windows.

I might misremember things, but i believe some Microsoft stuff was inside PPA, so for someone just switching from windows it's actually more likely to delve into the apt fuckery.

Noob distro btw

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

lol, didn't know that

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Neither money nor states are dogmatic in their nature. They exist under some basis, that can be verified, and that defines their properties. Gods have arbitrary abilities that cannot be verified.

The only benefits of a religion are being a part of community and coping with reality. The first is not unique to religion, the second is delusional and leads to lots of misjudgement, harms one's ability to percieve and analyze the objective reality. In other words, even the benefits are quite controversial in their usefulness here.

By the way, if you think about this, religion as a coping mechanism is as widespread only because it have been a substitute for more healthy alternatives for literal milleniums.

Religion should be a thing of past, but alas, magical thinking is still strong in modern society. To get rid of religions, first and foremost we should teach people about common logic fallacies and manipulations, so they would detect and avoid them more easily

view more: next ›