I admit I’m very out of the loop, but my understanding is that remote access via their servers is the only supported remote viewing solution? Anything else is a “hack” so to speak.
Sure, apart from charging for remote access.
Bad take in this case.
Didn’t the Supreme Court just rule it’s too close to midterms to redraw maps?
Why stop there? If you filter it by “users not using windows” we can get that number over 90%!
We have hundreds of devices running this exact described situation, and we’ve not run into a single instance of this. Is this just one guy on Reddit complaining and the media ran with it?
This is such a dumb take.
“We deleted it but the law says nothing about extensive backups of backups we forgot about in cold storage oopsie daisy uwu!”
I mean, are you intending to retroactively add SSL to every tool implementing SSL in the past few decades?…
Browsers aren’t the only thing that ingress SSL.
He’s burned either way. Following illegal orders is still illegal. You are responsible for your actions, even if those actions were ordered by higher ups.
view more: next ›
I believe this is an automated TestFlight push. Meaning there’s no direct user involvement, and it’s simply pulling commit messages.
I’ve always treated the voyager TestFlight as a nightly build. Use the app as per normal, report any issues you find. You re not explicitly being asked to test something in particular (despite what the TestFlight prompts suggest.)